Compare And Contrast Kurtz And Macbeth

1602 Words4 Pages

Through popular children’s films, the villain is typically represented as intimidating and dark. Their evil aura is portrayed through dark clothing, and dramatic music, while on the other hand, protagonists in these popular films are represented as whimsical and gracious. Despite being assumed as superior people, Kurtz and Macbeth both truly exemplify how dark and evil can be shielded by being of higher authority. Both the Shakespearean play Macbeth and the novel Heart of Darkness focus on the evil that can be presented through acts of greed and deceit. But the way in which it is represented through characters Kurtz and Macbeth in many ways, differs. Kurtz and Macbeth were initially two highly admired leaders at one point, but both shared a dramatic downfall that ultimately lead to their deaths. From Macbeth unwillingly murdering the king of Scotland, to Kurtz stealing ivory for his own personal benefit, both stories take a dark, and unexpected turn for the worst. “Greed” is defined as being ‘the intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth and power”. With strong influence from his avarice wife, Macbeth found himself having to choose between saking his morality, or giving in to his wife’s impact. At first, Macbeth presented little to no greedy characteristics. He was completely …show more content…

Darkness usually is not exhibited through leadership and losses of prosperity, but throughout Macbeth and Heart of Darkness, the downfalls of Kurtz and Macbeth exemplify the true corruption that results from immoral behavior. Both of these stories show what blind leadership can lead to, and how these leaders were able to trick a wide audience into thinking they were capable of leading their group to success. All in all, these two tragic stories illustrate what unpleasant outcomes can come from acts of greed and

Open Document