Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The motivation of the action in Beowulf
Conclusion about beowulf
The motivation of the action in Beowulf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The motivation of the action in Beowulf
A hero is someone is who is courageous, fearless, admirable, and humble. Someone who puts others needs before their own. Someone who is selfless.
A villain is someone who is evil. Someone who is greedy and self-absorbent Someone who only does things that benefits them only, and does not care how their actions affect others.
In this assigned literature, the villains in this piece are Grendel and Grendel's, mother. Grendel is a villain because he was a jealous monster. He was jealous of the hall-building that Hrothgar built. He envied the laughter he would hear from the people in the building every day. He then attacks the sleeping heroes in the building, slaughtering them. This went on for two days straight. Once Grendel was killed, his mother seeks out to avenge her son's death. She kills Escher (Hrothgar's shoulder companion). Grendel and Grendel's mother only does things for their-self. They do not think or care how their actions affect others, and the consequences that shortly follows their actions.
…show more content…
The heroes in this piece are Hrothgar and Beowulf.
One of the reasons Hrothgar is a hero is because he built a building named Heorot. Heorot was essentially built for great treasures. It was a place people loved and admired. Another reason why Hrothgar is a hero is that when he could not handle the Grendel problem, he put his pride to the side and asked for help from Beowulf. He wasn't afraid to look like a failure, he did it for the people. So no one would live in fear. Beowulf is also a hero in this piece because he is humble. When he and Grendel first set out to fight, he stated he would not use weapons because Grendel does not use weapons. He wanted the fight and victory to be fair. Beowulf dies in honor, he dies after killing Grendel and barely getting away from Grendel's mother. Beowulf displays true
courage. n Beowulf, the absence of the fear of death is the hero’s central characters and this is prevalent in the daily life of the hero. This is important because a hero should perceive all human life as precious and worth protecting, and this is the bedrock of the advancement of a beginning of western’s civilization step towards humanism and pro-democratic partisan transformations that is beginning to come to terms with humanity.
During the film, Grendel shows fear and pain, making the observer feel sympathy for the character even though he is the villain. As stated by Asma, “monsters can stand as symbols of human vulnerability” (62). The monster Grendel is portrayed such that the viewer could place himself in the position of the monster and think how he would react in the same situation. For instance, he attacked the mead hall due to the distress caused him by the boisterous celebrations, this was shown as Grendel’s cause for his attacks (Zemeckis, Beowulf). Also showing Grendel’s interactions with his mother, causes the viewer to see him in a childlike state, her stroking his face, speaking softly while asking him questions, such as if he harmed Hrothgar in his attacks (Zemeckis, Beowulf). Bringing Grendel as a sympathetic character in the film, causes the viewer to feel sympathy for him instead as only viewing him as the demon from
Grendel the hero and Grendel the villain. He is either hated or loved. He is the epitome of good and evil. His good is seen through pushing the humans to unite and advance to fight against him while his evil is on display when terrorizing the humans. The Anglo-Saxons, the community in which Grendel terrorizes, view him as the purest and darkest form of evil. Grendel’s mother sees him as just another troubled child whom she deeply cares for. This exciting battle against good and evil often brings ourselves into question. In the story of “Grendel,” good and evil is often compared and contrasted through humans, the environment, and Grendel’s family in order to analyze human moral compasses.
In both Grendel in the novel and the epic poem Beowulf, the character Grendel is perceived in two different perspectives. Although some similarities do connect from both stories, Grendel's character is very different because in the novel, Grendel is a way more sympathetic character that is victimized rather in the epic poem, Grendel is a ruthless crazed monster who murders everyone he wants. Some main differences that help us see who Grendel really is in these two stories are what point of view they were told in, Grendel's isolation, and Grendel being perceived as a victim vs. a murderer.
Two stories describe the same death. Which story got it right? When comparing Grendel by John Gardner against the ancient epic poem Beowulf, in my opinion, Grendel’s story made the better argument. In the story, Grendel is humanized, and consequently relatable. His story line fit well with the story of Beowulf, and in the book Grendel, it was expressed from Grendel’s perspective.
Grendel is a monster in the eyes of the Danes, but it is not until he meets with the dragon that he starts to act like the monster he is supposedly bound to be. Manu Bennett will provide the movements for the digitally produced image of Grendel, but it is more the look that seals this deal. Azog from The Hobbit represents Grendel, as he accepts his fate as a monster against people. Both Grendel and Azog fight for themselves, but are feared by other men. Although Azog is a scary representation of Grendel, there is still a heart of a child within.
Grendel and Beowulf are both interesting books although Grendel may have done wrong by killing, the story he tells makes him seem very intelligent and that he is not just a killer. However, one of these stories is better than the other, sure Beowulf is a good story too, but Grendel is overall better .The author in Grendel uses more of a creative word choice. Grendel’s book portrays the story better because of the detail in the story, the specific, smart, and variety of word choice that Grendel uses and lastly, the huge fight at the end of the story has much more detail and it creates images in the reader's head, it has more action and it made the fight more understandable. With all these things being said
In both the novel Grendel by John Gardner as well as the epic poem Beowulf translated by Seamus Heaney, the two authors depict Grendel in significantly different portrayals. Gardner’s Grendel is very complex and complicated while Grendel in Beowulf is much simpler in the sense that he is a vicious animalistic monster. The two depictions are essentially opposites in the sense that in Beowulf Grendel is more vicious but in Grendel Grendel is more complex and he changes throughout the novel. It is not clearly stated in either book what Grendel’s specifics are such as what he looks like or what kind of creature he is. The only thing that is known about Grendel’s physicality is that he is very hairy like a monster would be and he has some human-like
The world is a big secretive place full of wrongness, hate, evilness, greed, and bloodlust. At the beginning humans were scared of the unknown. Humans were scared of theses feelings that are decaying hands reaching to destroy. To counterpoise this fear humans wrote about that the unknown as foreign monster causing havoc and ending with a untainted Hero killing this immoral substance an example is Beowulf. Beowulf is the first english tale written down however Grendel by John Gardner reveals Grendel a self pitying monster side of the story; “Poor Grendel will hang here and starve to death and no one with ever miss him!” He is the antagonist in both Grendel and Beowulf. Gardner conveys that Grendel is reflection of the his surrounding humans
Never judge a book by its cover. This is a very common quote but it’s applicable to many different situations. In the epic Beowulf, translated by Burton Raffel, the main character battles a terrifying monster named Grendel. John Gardner’s novel, Grendel retells the story of Beowulf from not-so-terrifying Grendel’s perspective. As the stories both recall, Grendel had been attacking Hrothgar’s mead hall and killing many men. Though the Danes viewed Grendel as a terrible monster, he’s really just a misunderstood troublemaker.
When reading a book and watching a movie, do you ever notice the differences that take place between the two? The Beowulf textbook version and Beowulf movie version differ in many ways, one being the characters. The movie displays characters as being more descriptive and the textbook as being more adventurous. Beowulf fought more than one creature; however, the events leading to them have total differences. Even events that are not so majorly different between the movie and textbook affect the outcome of particular scenes. The differences between Beowulf movie and Beowulf textbook that make them both interesting are that Wiglaf helped Beowulf fight the dragon; Beowulf fought Grendel, and Beowulf asked for a castle of remembrance.
Imagine being scooped out of a couch, in the middle of the night, while you’re dead asleep, and run off with to be eaten. That’s the fate of more than a few warriors in the mead hall of King Hrothgar of the Epic Beowulf. I, for one, think such horrifying actions deserve the very bloody consequences they brought about. Beowulf is a hero above all others for his fearless actions to combat the monster responsible, Grendel, who torments and murders anyone unfortunate enough to cross his path. Though Grendel is part of a race of monsters, (Breeden) that is not the basis for the justice served to him, that punishment was entirely decided by his deeds.
The tale of Beowulf has become a legend. The epic is one of the first stories written in Modern English and most likely was passed down orally for centuries before. The story details the deeds of Beowulf, a great man of the Germanic tribe of the Geats, who assists the Danes in dealing with monsters of mythical proportions, namely a monster named Grendel, his mother, and a dragon. Grendel, written by John Gardner, offers a modern perspective on the ancient tale. Gardner’s story is written in the perspective of the monster Grendel himself and provides a deeper look into the workings of his mind. Both stories portray Beowulf, although from very different perspectives.
In life, people are always told to be good. Parents tell their children not to steal, hit, or kick. As a society most people are taught to do the right thing. So, what happens if someone is bad? There are hardly any stories written about the bad person. The epic poem, Beowulf by Seamus Heaney, is written about the “bad guy”. While Grendel, by John Gardner, and also the book that comes after Beowulf, is written about the “good guy”. There are many other differences in the writing styles other then, one book is about the good person and the other the bad. Beowulf and Grendel both use kennings and alliteration, are written in different time periods, and
Every great hero needs a great villain. Thus Grendel was created to rival Beowulf. With most heroic stories, only the hero’s vision and ideals are shown. The novel Grendel, on the other hand, shows the reader the true feelings of the villainous monster, Grendel. But, the two Grendels, the version in the novel and the version in Beowulf, have several differences. The version of Grendel in the novel is more intricate than the version of Grendel in Beowulf because Grendel in the novel searches for meaning in his life, Grendel in Beowulf is portrayed as only a monster, and Grendel in the novel has emotions and has sympathy for mankind.
We have all seen villains in literature and in movies. Villains have been interpreted in many ways such as being malicious and terrorizing citizens, although that is not always the case. In Beowulf, Grendel is the villain throughout the entire poem, he is ruthless and shrewd, and has plans to petrify Hrothgar’s kingdom. In class, we defined a villain as “a person, place or thing, ruthless and cunning, motivated by deceitful and selfish desires whose thrill seeking detailed plans lead to the destruction of society”. In the poem, Grendel shows the qualities of being a villain, he is ruthless, cunning, and motivated by underhanded narcissistic desires and plans to lead the destruction of society.