Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nessesary of federalism
Federalism as a form of government essay
Federalism as a form of government essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nessesary of federalism
There are different kinds of governments such the Federal , the Unitary and the confederate government. Each one has its own characteristics. For example, the unitary is when the central government has all the power and the administrative departments carry out what this government dictates. While the federal government divides up power between a strong national government and smaller local government. Confederate government is when the central government has less power than the individual state or the national government.
I believe that the federal government is the best because the power should not be centered and controlled by one person or group. The power should be shared and people are to have a say in their lives and what they want.
An example of this would be that the federal government has control over the military, foreign policy, our postal system and the monetary policies. The state government has the responsibility for the police/law enforcement, road building and the schools.
Formed at the eve of the Civil War, the United States (USA) and the Confederate States (CSA) were created for multiple reasons. The main reason of the formation includes that of political issues and slavery issues. Other ideas include the military, economics, etc. The USA was led by President Abraham Lincoln and the CSA was led under President Jefferson Davis. The CSA included the states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. The United States and Confederate States can be compared based on their advantages and viewpoints in the fields of how and why they were formed, the rights of the federal and state governments, views on slavery, economic issues, and the military strategies.
The first two parties were created in the later 1700’s, and these parties were made for two different purposes. The Federalist & Democratic-Republicans had some similar and opposing aspects, but mostly opposing.
Since the Dawn of time, man was had many beliefs from the belief of gods or a god, democracy and communism. In the beginning days of our nation (United States of America) the bill of rights was being created due to American Revolution and the weakness of the articles of the confederation. The articles of confederation were the constitution at the time for the United States of America before and after the American Revolution, which we fought against the tyranny of the British government. The American government at the time realized the Articles of Confederation was weak and need to be changed. This resulted in the bill rights being drafted and added into the US Constitution. But before the bill rights
In the early American colonies, the south and the north developed into two distinctly different colonies. Although their origins were both from Europe, their customs and living habits became so different that it would play a major role in America’s history. There are many reasons why these differences occurred but only a few major reasons stand out. Religion, greed and the composition of the colonies are some of the major reasons why the north and south grew to be so different in the late 1600’s. Different religions in specific colonies varied, but the people from the New England region were generally more devoted to their religious beliefs, whereas people from the south felt religion wasn’t as important. Children from the north are taught from The Bible as soon as possible and this instills high moral values into the people. In the south only the wealthiest families could afford education, causing the common population to be ignorant and un-educated. The people of New England were willing to work together and help each other for the sake of the community because they felt that they were working under God’s will. (Doc. A) The south on the other hand worked to better themselves through the Headright System, which ended up pitting the people against each other instead of working with each other. The people of Massachusetts agreed: "We whose names are underwritten, being by God’s providence engaged together to make a plantation…" (Doc. D) This shows that reli...
The reconstruction of the Union began under President Lincoln before the end of the war, and carried on by President Johnson after the assassination of President Lincoln. After Lincoln’s death, the leadership of the nation bestowed upon Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. According to A. Brinkley (pg. 375), Johnson revealed his plan for reconstruction or “Restoration”, as he preferred to call it, soon after he took office and implemented it during the summer of 1865 when Congress was in recess. Like Lincoln, he offered some form of amnesty to Southerners who would take a pledge of loyalty to the Union. In most other respect, however, his plan resembled the Wade-Davis Bill. The next phase of reconstruction, known as the Congressional Plan or "Radical" modernization had begun, which undid everything started by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson. These radicals, mostly republicans, motivated by three main factors revenge, concern for the freedmen, and political concerns. The Radicals in Congress pushed through a number of measures designed to assist the freedmen, but also demonstrate the supremacy of Congress over the president. These events included the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Army Appropriations Act. The Radical Republicans prepared an effort in Congress to impeach the president Johnson as a payback for resisting their platforms. The vote in the Senate was 35-19 for conviction, one vote short of the necessary two-thirds. This was in turn to a few Republicans that had crossed over and voted with the Democrats, thus refuting the ultimate retaliation to the Radicals. If the removal of President Johnson had gone thru, it might have permanently weakened the executive branch. Congr...
The Civil war could very easily be known as one of the greatest tragedies in United States history. After the Civil War, the people of The United States had so much anger and hatred towards each other and the government that 11 Southern states seceded from the Nation and parted into two pieces. The Nation split into either the Northern abolitionist or the Southern planation farmers. The Reconstruction era was meant to be exactly how the name announces it to be. It was a time for the United States to fix the broken pieces the war had caused allowing the country to mend together and unite once again. The point of Reconstruction was to establish unity between the states and to also create and protect the civil rights of the former slaves. Although Reconstruction failed in many aspects such as the upraise in white supremacy and racism, the reconstruction era was a time the United States took a lead in the direction of race equality.
How did the Enumerated power, Reserved power and Concurrent power develop their governments? IT was a way for the states to handle things how they wanted. There are 1 national government, 1 state government, and 1 state and federal government compromised. The name of these three types of governments are Enumerated power, Reserved power and Concurrent power. The Enumerated power, Reserved power and Concurrent power all had the power to do something. For example, Enumerated power, Reserved power and Concurrent power all have a type of government.
In this unit, we learned about the two types of governments the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. We also learned about people views on these two types of government. The United States Constitution created a strong central government using checks and balances. Under the Constitution, there were three branches of government: the executive, legislative and judicial branch ("Branches of Government."). Under the articles of confederation, there was a weak central government with limited powers ("Transcript of Articles of Confederation (1777)."). Both the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution had many pros and cons. The people in the colonies either had federalist or anti-federalist views. A federalist is a person who
“We are met on a great battlefield of that war” (Lincoln, 1863). On April 12, 1861, the people of the United States were split into two sides. The north fought to preserve the Union and the South wanted to ensure the independence of the Confederacy. As a result the country was forced into a civil war and many lives were taken in the violent struggle. Both the North and the South reacted differently to the losses; for example The North wanted a “rebirth of a nation” and in order to achieve this, the Union needed to update the existing rules set by the founding fathers. On the other hand, the South decided to leave the Union and convince other states to secede with them in order to “give birth” to a new nation and remove the old forms of government. Even though both the Union and the Confederacy wanted to change America’s form of government, neither of the sides had similar ideas and both contrasted with each other immensely.
The government is the formal institution through which a land and its people are ruled.1 However, many different countries have many different ways of organizing their system of government. In the United States, we are said to have a federal system with two sovereigns. Federalism is the halfway point between a confederacy and a unitary system. These three systems all differ in the way things are decided and more importantly who makes these decisions.
Then there is the state government which are responsible for governing affairs within their borders, and carrying out federal laws and programs at the state level. They are governed by their own constitutions and retain any rights that the U.S. Constitution does not exclusively grant to the federal government. The state government is limited as they cannot form alliances with other states and must honor and respect the laws and institutions of the other states. And finally there is the federal government which is the central and highest level of government in the U.S. It is divided into three branches and each branch has its own rights and power to check and balance the powers of each branch. The federal government has the power to regulate taxes, establish federal welfare programs and make laws in the interest of the nation as a whole. There are also limitations set to the federal government’s authority, as they cannot ask local law enforcements agencies to do minor administrative jobs. Although all levels of government have their own responsibilities there are limits to interfering with other governments
The difference between the separation of powers and federalism is slim to nothing. Federalism consists of the national government and the fifty states, in which the national government is defined by the separation of powers: the three branches of government. Federalism is the over view form of government that is stated in the Constitution which implies the separation of powers between central and regional government. On the other hand, separation of powers is the separation of branches under the national government. In other words, the separation of powers is a subunit of federalism.
The United States of America was founded on a belief that every citizen should have an equal opportunity and voice in the matters of the laws of the land they live in. A blueprint that assists in that ideal, is the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution has the principles of limited government and federalist standards to give citizens a part in influencing the lives of Americans. Federalism is a systematic way for the United States to separate and divide the authority, power, and services of federal, state, and local governments. Although the federal government and the state governments were both established for the people and by the people, there is still confusion on the best ways to go about creating policies that can benefit Americans. A prime example includes the era of President Obama, or more specifically, the numerous amount of lawsuits and disagreements between the Obama administration and the State of Texas.
A federal government shares the power between the states and central government. Many countries use federalism as their political structure, and the United States is one of those countries. “In a federal system, the participating political communities agree to pursue some objectives together and other objectives on their own…they agree to establish a central government and to empower it to make and administer laws in some areas; and they agree to retain the power…themselves in other areas” (Smith 13). So what other type of political structures are out there? Two different types of political structure, that students have rarely heard of or discussed, are unitary and confederal structures. A unitary structure is one where the government has all the power and rules as a single entity. It is where a central government is totally in control of the weaker states, which