The common view of fascism and communism in the United States is that they are evil systems and we cannot allow them to spread. This however is not the idea that nearly every legal country in the world shares unlike slavery which is nearly universally opposed in a legal sense. Slavery in the Greek world had a different meaning and tone in Greek civilization than what slavery means to the modern world. Therefor we cannot assume that the evil that many people see in communism and fascism equates to the evil that was Greek slavery.
While it might make sense from a U.S standpoint to declare fascism and communism as evil systems that have a similar amount of evil that slavery is declared to be, when you view fascism and communism from a different
…show more content…
While you could make the same point about slavery, the parts of the world where slavery is accepted in a legal sense is now fairly low to nearly nonexistent. So how can we define a system as similarly evil to another when slavery is declared unjust in nearly the whole world and systems such as communism are not declared evil in all parts of the world. In fact based on this it appears that slavery is in fact more of an evil than either of the systems of government mention. This is based on our view of slavery, in which it must be understood that our view of slavery is much different than that of what the Greek civilization view slavery as.
If Greek slavery is to be compared to fascism and communism, then America when it openly practiced slavery should also be compared to such evils. Even more so due to the nature of American slavery over Greek slavery. American slavery, and commonly modern slavery in general is based around the idea of racism primary. The combination of hatred, an idea of slaves as inferior, as well as the economic aspects kept the institution of American slavery alive for a long period of time. There would not have been many people
…show more content…
Fascism, though to a much greater extent, communism is not considered evil in every part of the legal world. So in this sense slavery in general must be a far worse evil than such systems of fascism and communism. However looking at Greek slave society, it appears that the lines between slaves and lower class citizens were often blurred together with each class appearing remarkable identical with each other. Therefor even though Greece might have had an significant amount more of slaves than other country’s might have had in that time period as well as future time periods, the lines between free citizens and slaves were much more blurred. It could be considered then that such a system was fairer than what many other countries had at the time. In this sense, in order to compare classic Greek civilization to fascism and communism, most of the other civilizations of the past eras would also have to be considered to have similarities to communism and fascist states. America itself would have had to be compared to such evil as a communist system since slavery in America was considered a permanent title to African Americans and based upon a hatred and belief of inferiority of African
In the Greco-Roman period slavery was not determined “by race, religion, kinds of work, clothing, ownership of property, or formal schooling.” In many cases slaves were treated fairly and were valued. The institution of slavery in the 19th century was vastly different, usually always depraving “the slave of dignity and the slave owner of humanity.” It was “a model…for the most extreme forms of exploitation, otherness, and even social death.” Aside from the oppression of early American slavery, this form of the institution was based on race. In contrast, the slavery of the Greco-Roman period was based in large part on class or social status. This difference highlights the fundamental problem with 19th century slavery, which is its explicit racism. Understanding the difference between the modern institution of slavery and the Greco-Roman slavery is very important in applying Ephesians to slavery in
Abraham Lincoln, the president that finally abolished slavery in the United States of America, ran for president against Stephen Douglass. Stephen Douglass desired to keep the disgusting institution of slavery legal, while Lincoln desired to abolish slavery permanently. The position of Douglass and his reasons for preserving the institution of slavery became clear in a speech he gave in 1858. According to civilwarcauses.org, Douglass presented the importance of democracy, and allowing communities to decide weather slavery should or should not be legal. (Speech of Stephen…, 2016) This of course sounds crazy to people in the modern day, but for at least a second time, occurring in the United States and in Greece, democracy upheld the institution of
...ry inhuman and corrupt time of American history, although, slavery did play a very large role in establishing our country’s economy. Yes, it was a very terrible time for the slaves and they were treated very inhumanly. Yes, the fact that the slaves were being beaten, raped, and tortured was very immoral, but without them the United States wouldn’t be what it is today. Slavery may have “ended” though President Abraham Lincolns’ signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, but we all know that isn’t true. African-Americans may have been considered free, but were still looked down upon as if they were not good enough simply because of the pigment of their skin. Even today living in the 21st century we still have to deal with issues of racism. When all is said and done, slavery was definitely one of the most important pieces of shaping the American culture today.
In conclusion, although the north offered more “freedom” to slaves, they were still not an egalitarian culture and society. The south did exploit them a lot more but the north still cheapen them by giving them the least and worthless things, while the white left the best for themselves.
Govind Thomas-Richardson M. White Pre/AP World History 16 November 2015 Communism vs. Fascism Communism and Fascism are often mistakenly used interchangeably. However, this is not the case. Although they are similar in authoritarian aspects, they are polar opposites on the economic scale (communism being on the left and fascism on the right). Communism is a system of social organization based on the unified ownership of all property in common with regard to the community or the state. Fascism, however, forcibly suppresses opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism making it centered more heavily on the state rather than the individual.
Slavery is immoral. Why? Because we hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal? Because life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness are unalienable rights endowed by our Creator? (“Declaration of Independence.” 1776.) Well, not all men are created equal. At least according to our Founding Fathers, African tribes, 18th century Europeans, the ancient Romans and Greeks, and … the Bible. As a matter of fact, slavery has not been immoral from humanity’s (also to be interpreted as America’s) standpoint but for only 150 years. Why then can we so firmly and undeniably declare that slavery is immoral? The answer lies in the writings of great political visionaries like Solon, Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Marx, and Lincoln. Individually they all have differing opinions about slavery. Taken together, however, their works reveal a timeline that shows how slavery has evolved from an accepted to a depraved custom. Slavery’s immorality is not limned in a constitution. Slavery is immoral because time has proven it to be immoral.
The Civil War Period has always been the primary hub of teaching in any American History classes. The era between the American Revolution and the Civil War was of a great importance since it has been the best and worst part of the western civilization during those times. The limelight was theirs when we turn back the pages of history. Consequently, slavery as an economic system and as a moral disgrace is one of the very most scandalous trend after the coming of the war. Prominent people had actual arguments about whether they are either pro-slavery or abolitionist, thus making the system even worse. Colonization to constraint of slavery on its natural eventual downfall is not merely the case now. Today, normal people have the same opinion about the moral repugnancy of slavery, and are left with a more complex idea about why many people supported the institution of slavery and why it was so difficult to eliminate that "peculiar institution."
Slavery was one of the most horrific and in human acts ever instilled on a race of people ever in our world's history. People were stolen from their homelands, broken apart from their families, and were thrust into a lifestyle that inhibited their every move and instilled harsh punishments on them. It is almost impossible for many of us to comprehend the mindsets that these slave owners possessed, but history paints a truly horrific and emotional picture for us all to see.
As Abraham Lincoln once said, “Those who deny freedom from others, deserve it not for themselves.” However, his statement was directed to the slavery that took place in the 1800s. That slavery involved African Americans that did not have any say in whether they would work or not. They were born into slavery, and they were sold from slave owner to slave owner. This is referred to as olden-day slavery. People today seem oblivious to the fact that slavery still exists today just because the way slavery used to be is not common anymore, just in racial or religious parts of Africa (Meyer, page 8). Modern-day slavery, however, is considered to be so secretive and so “under the radar” that most first-world countries have no idea what is going on
Slavery has a history going back to the earliest civilizations. Slavery was known in almost every ancient civilization as Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, Ancient India, Ancient Greece, Roman Empire, pre-columbian civilizations of the Americas.
Slavery today is a large concern to many people, just as it always has been. Any type of slavery is considered immoral and unjust in today’s society and standards. However, before the Civil War, slavery was as common as owning a dog today. Many in the United States, particularly in the South, viewed slavery as a “positive good” and owned slaves that were crucial to their business and income. However, the Civil War then changed the lifestyle of many southerners in a negative way.
In conclusion, racism is a recently developed term, whereas slavery has been part of the history for hundreds of years. Europeans weren’t chosen as slaves not because of their race, but because they were in short supply and were less immune to native diseases. On the other hand, African slavery was the outcome of different economic factors, followed by series of historical events. Europeans opportunists and entrepreneurs saw “Africans” as the key to generate surplus wealth, and to establish modern capitalism. On top of that, historical events such as Trans-Atlantic slave trade, Bacon Rebellion also strengthened the position of Africans as potential slaves. In short, conditions developed from gradual technological, historical, and economic change in Africa, New World, and Great Britain led to the institution of African slavery.
Slavery was never thought of as being morally wrong until the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. The Atlantic World’s country each developed slavery at their own pace. The South developed some similarities to Spain including agriculture based system but also differed in the idea of coartacion. Whereas England and France emancipation process was quick with the Freedom of Principles the Southern Colonies did not abolish slavery all at once.The Portuguese has a unified Slave code and the colonist developed slave codes themselves. Throughout the history of the South they had an agriculture based economy like the Spanish, a Slave codes like the Portuguese, gradual emancipation unlike the French and English, and did not allow slaves to buy their own freedom as the Spanish coartacion
There is a long-running debate about whether communism or capitalism is preferable and shows more of beneficial aspects. Capitalism is defined as an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations. While communism is a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by the state. The principle of capitalism is if one is successful and hardworking will keep improve and progress in life. While the principle of communism is to keep all the people the same, a lot of people may say that this is a good thing but when talking about real life this would add laziness and demotivation because hardworking people would gain the same credit as lazy people. Capitalism and communism are the two main economic systems that are used by governments nowadays. Obviously capitalism is a much better economic system to be used by a state; practical uses and statistical facts qualify capitalism as much more successful. Also, capitalism is more beneficial to the state, common citizens, and business owners. It would be very useful to test the two systems according to practical uses of the two systems on states and monitor which states succeeded and which states failed.
...re. Although slave revolts were uncommon in Greece, there were several in Rome. The most historical revolt was led by Spartacus and lasted about two years. This came about because Spartacus and several other gladiators broke out and started fighting the armies that came after them. This led to a more kind way to treat the slaves with the hope that they would not rise up again. In some places a slave could earn their freedom by either purchasing it with the small amount of money that their owners let them make or they could be set free in a masters last will and testament.