Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on vampires
Vampire in folklore vs literature
Essays on vampires
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on vampires
Everyone has heard of vampires, from the award winning novels and movies Twilight to TV shows such as The Vampire Diaries, Vampires have become a worldwide phenomenon. These books, movies and TV shows have come a long way from the “original vampire” Bram Stocker’s Dracula. Written in 1897, Dracula quickly gained popularity and later became a classic. While some may believe that Bram Stoker would be devastated by the portrayal of sparling vampires that restrain from human blood, both Dracula and modern vampires have their merits.
While in modern vampire portrayals vampires are seen as inhumanly attractive, this was not the case in earlier vampire lore. Count Dracula is described as a “tall old man, clean shaven save for a long white mustache, and clad in black from head to foot, without a single speck of color about him anywhere.”
…show more content…
(Dracula, pg.42). He is normal in appearance; not standing out from the crowd, but vampires in Twilight tend to be more conspicuous, “Every one of them was chalky pale… They all had very dark eyes despite the range in their hair…were all, devastatingly, inhumanly beautiful.” (Twilight, pgs. 18-19). Bram Stoker wants his character to look as humanly as possible to illustrate how even the most ordinary of people can be monsters, while in Twilight it is evident the difference between human and vampire. Bram Stoker started the public fascination of the vampire legend and the ways in which we think they act, live, and can be defeated. He did all of this with his novel, Dracula, in 1807; taking almost an entire decade to write, Bram may have been the most influential author in this mythical legend. Almost two centuries later, Stephenie Meyer began the craze once again with a new twist and outlook on the vampire persona. In 2005, she introduced the world to the modern version of a vampire tale with Twilight and the endearing character Edward Cullen. Both authors have different backgrounds and influences. Stoker was from Dublin, Ireland and attended Trinity University with honors in science and then returned for his M.A. degree; but Meyer went to Brigham Young University for a bachelor’s degree in English. These authors brought to the fore-front the fictional but intense and “romantic” idea of the way in which vampires exist in society, in each of their times. Bram and Meyer go into detail the ways in which vampires survive and exist, the ways that they love, and the ways in which they are characterized and destroyed. Bram went to a basic perception and gave us the most perceived conception of these ideals; while Meyer gave us a new conception, erasing all the ideals that Bram had wrote about. In modern society, we have tweaked the tale of vampires to fit our needs of romantic gratification, the idea of being immortal, and the need for something, in a way, realistic to fit our fantasies. In the aspect of romantic gratification, Dracula is not in the mood for romance. All he seemed to be in the mood for is his unquenchable thirst for blood. The slightest hint of a romantic side to Dracula is in his obsession with Lucy Westenra and his desire for her blood after first drinking it in England, while on the run. Dracula drank so much of her blood and craved it so that blood transfusions were necessary and eventually he killed her and turned her into a vampire; but then no longer wanted anything to do with her. Dracula gave the ideal that his obsession with a woman went only as far as she could provide for him, give him something that he needed in order to thrive. With Lucy, it was her blood and not the need for an epic love. Switching aspects, in Twilight, Edward Cullen is all about the romance with his obsession, Bella Swan. Edward’s obsession is so deep that he watched her sleep and refused to be with her in a sexual relationship until after they were married. Also, he only turned Bella into a vampire after she had given birth to their child and being a vampire would be the only way for her to continue to exist and he could not bear the thought of being without her. Edward showed that romance and love was possible for a vampire, that an epic love was possible. He wanted to be with her; never wanting to drink her blood even though it was the thing he desired most and was always trying to protect her for everything and everyone…even him at times. This romantic gratification that we have made it to be is that of an untouchable and “too good to be true” romance. We turned it into an obsession filled and driven by only the thirst and need for the blood of the woman, to the need and wanting of the woman’s presence forever. The idea of forever seemed perfect, it is being able to never face death and to see the world and society as it evolves and changes. This idea comes from the way in which the vampire exists and lives. In Dracula, the Count must survive and live off of the blood of human beings. In the beginning, the Count shows his thirst for human blood when Jonathan Harker accidentally cuts himself shaving and the Count lunges at Harker’s throat in “demonic fury”. With this part of immortality also comes the ways in which they could be destroyed. In Dracula, the “service” to kill a vampire and save their soul is to drive a wooden stake through her heart, cut off her head, and stuff it with garlic. In Twilight, the way in which Edward and his family of vampires survive is by drinking the blood of animals; they have controlled their thirst so that they are not harmful to humans and can socialize with them. Their ability to survive off the blood of humans made them less of a target for destruction, though they could be destroyed. Sunlight is never a problem, neither is the threat of a wooden stake or garlic, they only threat to their immortality is being decapitated and torn apart, the pieces burned and destroyed. These parts of vampire’s characteristics are the downside, the worst of the worst; though they are not the only characteristics they obtain, there are some realistic and human-like ones. Count Dracula leads the life of seclusion and mystery; he does not come out in daylight and he sleeps in a coffin. He allows himself to be almost invisible; the only thing that alerts those to his presence is his thirst. His characteristics are almost unnoticeable in the dark: the fear of sunlight, the non-reflection, his ability to shape shift into a bat, the hurtful effects of religious symbols, and his pale and drained complexion. If seen in the sunlight, these things would give him away as being abnormal; this is why the place in which he resides must be somewhere where he can skillfully and completely conceal himself. His residence is in Castle Dracula in Transylvania, then in England, and then back to Castle Dracula. Edward Cullen is almost the exact opposite of the Count Dracula. Edward lives a life of exuberance and somewhat mystery, he keeps to himself and his family, coming out in the daylight-during stormy and cloudy weather only and never sleeps. His exuberance comes from his love of fast cars and the way in which he dresses-barely wearing the same thing twice. His characteristics are faint, but dominant: the ways his eyes change color in correspondence with his hunger (black=hungry and topaz=satisfied), his pale skin that shimmers in the sunlight, his strength and speed, and the way his appearance is that of a “Greek God”, these things are the reason why him and his family move to the rainiest place in the continental united states, Forks, Washington. Edward Cullen and Count Dracula give society two different glimpses into the lives of vampires.
The classic of Count Dracula verse the modern of Edward Cullen give us the basic, yet new way of thinking about the ways in which vampires exist and how they behave. Count Dracula is the older version of the two, he allows us as a society to see the comfortable and fearful ways in which he lives; he allows us to be able to distinguish him against the living and allowing us to fear him or be unaware to his even existence. Edward Cullen on the other hand is the newer and hipper version, he allows society to see him as the romantic and mysterious ways in which he lives; he allows us to be unaware that he is different from us, he is the everyday guy with the one exception that he is a vampire. Dracula and Edward give society the knowledge about vampires and allow for formations of different opinions and thoughts; though on fact remains: in modern society, we have tweaked the tale of vampires to fit our needs of romantic gratification, the idea of being immortal, and the need for something, in a way, realistic to fit our
fantasies.
It is precisely the point that Hollywood distorts and corrupts serious literature for the entertainment pleasures of a mass audience. In the task of comparing and contrasting the novel of "Dracula" to film extracts of "Bram Stoker’s Dracula", values, meaning and context discovered lie between discrepancy and similarity. The change from differing mediums, novel and film, reveal characteristics and possibilities of narratives. Through the advancement of technology, modern writers have gained a cinematic approach to their writing. However Dracula, written in 1987 by Abraham Stoker, where the introduction of technology was gradual, forging inventions such as the typewriter and phonograph, made reference to in the novel, had no anticipation of what technology would have an effect on such writings. With society’s fascination with the supernatural, and love of technology, Dracula’s many adaptations, film, stage, have ensured its survival through the passage of time.
This fictional character was soon to be famous, and modified for years to come into movie characters or even into cereal commercials. But the original will never be forgotten: a story of a group of friends all with the same mission, to destroy Dracula. The Count has scared many people, from critics to mere children, but if one reads between the lines, Stoker’s true message can be revealed. His personal experiences and the time period in which he lived, influenced him to write Dracula in which he communicated the universal truth that good always prevails over evil. Religion was a big part of people’s lives back in Stoker’s time.
First off, in Stoker’s Dracula the reader’s suspension of disbelief is lower as compared to folklore tales. He is a tall creepy old person when first revealed, but later on in the novel he is shown to be more sinister. This creates a sense of mystery and confusion. Another reason is that he is a well developed antagonist. Often times he outsmarts the main characters creating a sense of suspense and irony because the readers know what is going to happen but the characters do not. But the most important reason of them all is the fact that Count Dracula takes elements from folklore and builds upon it. Stoker uses classic folklore to create a foundation for Dracula, for example; Dracula’s powers give him the ability to live forever, or shapeshift into other creatures as well. They also give him weaknesses such as: holy objects and daylight which mitigates his powers. These powers regularly add to the mysterious tone in the book. Count Dracula climbing down the castle wall upside down or moving slowly across a yard as a cloud of vapor makes the reader question what is happening. He has the ability to control the weather and animals as well. Stoker gives him powers from legend to make him a formidable force in the story. Although his appearance is unpleasant, he is quite the seductive character. He uses this to his advantage when trying to turn Mina and Lucy into vampires. Dracula preys on ‘weaker’ beings in a hierarchical system where he feasts on the women and once the women have turned to vampires, they feed on children. He can also use telepathy to tell where other vampires are, however, this works against him in the final chase of the book. In short his powers are unique and interesting and help to make the Count a powerful
A noticeable difference in the way movies have changed over the years is evident when comparing and contrasting two films of different eras which belong to the same genre and contain the same subject matter. Two vampire movies, Dracula and Bram Stoker's Dracula, present an interesting example of this type of study.
The late nineteenth century Irish novelist, Bram Stoker is most famous for creating Dracula, one of the most popular and well-known vampire stories ever written. Dracula is a gothic, “horror novel about a vampire named Count Dracula who is looking to move from his native country of Transylvania to England” (Shmoop Editorial Team). Unbeknownst of Dracula’s plans, Jonathan Harker, a young English lawyer, traveled to Castle Dracula to help the count with his plans and talk to him about all his options. At first Jonathan was surprised by the Count’s knowledge, politeness, and overall hospitality. However, the longer Jonathan remained in the castle the more uneasy and suspicious he became as he began to realize just how strange and different Dracula was. As the story unfolded, Jonathan realized he is not just a guest, but a prisoner as well. The horror in the novel not only focuses on the “vampiric nature” (Soyokaze), but also on the fear and threat of female sexual expression and aggression in such a conservative Victorian society.
Over the years people have given new out looks on the original vampire, Dracula. He was a tall non-attractive looking man who would never come out during the day. Hollywood however has made new vampire stories such as Twilight, True Blood, and The Vampire Diaries/The Originals that have new ideas of a vampire. These novels/books all have differences, but some still have key characteristics of the original vampire.
Vampires have been viewed with fear and fascination for centuries. Of all the vampires in literature, Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula is probably the most prominent vampire. Recently, there has been an upsurge of public interest in socially acceptable vampires, like the Cullens in the Twilight series by Stephanie Meyer. This essay will contrast Stoker’s Dracula with Carlisle Cullen, one of the newer vampires from the Twilight series. They will be examined in terms of their origins and how they dealt with immortality.
Bram Stoker took the legend of Vlad Tepes and used it as an idea for Dracula. He was the ruler of an old country called Wallachia. He is most famous for impaling his enemies on sticks around his castle. He taught himself how to miss vital organs in the body, causing the victim to die a slow painful death. This is why people consider him an ancient vampire. What people don’t know about him is that the rich loved him, but the poor hated him. To anyone that didn’t have to seal to make it by he was great. But to the poor people who couldn’t buy food, they were always in fear of him. He was abused as a child, and this is what is thought to have caused his behavior. (Melton 1053)
Dracula, the most famous vampire of all time, which readers were first introduced to by Irish author Bram Stoker in 1897 with his novel Dracula, which tells the story of the mysterious person named Count Dracula (Stoker). The book is an outstanding masterpiece of work, which is why it has been a prototype for various movie releases over the decades. Whenever a film director decides to make a movie on behalf of a novel the hope is that the characters concur from the novel to the movie, which leads to the exploration of the resemblances and modifications between the characters in Dracula the novel by Bram Stoker and Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 movie directed by Francis Ford Coppola.
Count Dracula has been the frontrunner for the modern day vampire lore and legends since being printed back in 1897, pop culture took the vampire traits from Bram Stoker’s Dracula and twisted them. In modern portrayals of vampire lore, each author chooses an original aspect from Stoker but then creates a little bit of their own lore in the process. Count Dracula appears to be a walking corpse from the pale and gaunt visual aesthetics to the coolness of his undead skin (Stoker). In some cultures, the vampire is able to transform from the body of a human being to that of a fellow creature of the night, a bat. In the novel Dracula more than one town was easily visualized through the detailed descriptions throughout the novel, thus
From Transylvania to Hollywood, vampires have transformed from unfamiliar, mysterious personalities to one of the most dominant monsters in the horror genre today. Vampires are one of the oldest and most noted creatures in mythology, with many variations of them around the world. Although the most famous version is Bram Stoker’s Dracula, many variants have come before and after telling of the same legend with their own added ideas and modifications to relate to their cultures. Today, there is a multitude of literary and film works that convey and resurface peoples’ fear of vampires. As gothic works like Dracula, by Bram Stoker and Scooby-Doo! and the Legend of the Vampire directed by Scott Jeralds share certain traits reflective of the genre;
In Twilight, Edward Cullen presents the question; “ But what if I’m not the hero? What if I’m the bad guy?” The role of vampires is very controversial. Back in the day they were evil, soulless monsters and people genuinely feared them. However, in the present day it seems that we have grown to love them and even hope to one day be them. There are a plethora of vampire stories and many of them have become immense hits. With so many vampire stories, it is not uncommon that readers are able to identify a vast amount of similarities. Although similar in aspects, there are still many differences between the classic and modern day vampires. Two highly popular stories, in which we can easily identify similarities and differences, are Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight.
Dracula, the 1931 film directed by Tod Browning is loosely based upon the novel of the same name. Therefore both share similar characteristics but are distinct. The differences between the novel and film occur due to the cinematic choices made as well as the fact that the film is based off of not only the novel Dracula but also the 1924 play Dracula. One major decision made by Browning was to alter the role of Johnathan Harker. In the novel Johnathan is the solicitor who meets with Dracula in Transylvania and narrowly escapes the “veritable prison” and is a changed man due to his experiences there (25). On the other hand, in the film Johnathan never visits Transylvania. Renfield is the one who does so instead. That provides Renfield with a
The “Otherness” Dracula possesses reinforces our own norms and beliefs through his transgression that separates him from society and the polarity to Western norms and ideals makes him an effective device for extorting revulsion and horror. Stoker’s novel employs Gothic tradition, providing “the principle embodiments and evocations of cultural anxieties” from which the very Gothic mood and horror is produced, establishing the baseline used to distinguish the modern vampires, as part of vampire mythology within the Gothic (Botting Aftergothic 280). Differences Between Dracula and Twilight The similarities between the two novels are namely Gothic imagery and theme, but the Gothic mood predominates in Dracula over Twilight and it is this difference that makes Twilight not belong in the vampire canon. Horror is the element that Dracula possesses that Edward does not, and it is crucial in the interplay between transgression and limit.
The author’s op-ed piece was published in 2009, the very peak of the vampire contagion, where one could find these creatures wherever they looked. This pandemonium that arose from vampires is what drove del Toro and Hogan to pen “Why Vampires Never Die.” Furthermore, the purpose behind this essay is to give an abridged description of the past of vampires for the people who had become fanatics of the creatures. Also, this essay showed how vampires have persisted in pop culture. They suggest that vampires have been remade by diverse cultures at different times, and this change echoes that society's angst and concerns. The novelist’s imply that Stroker’s Dracula may mirror an exaggerated human on a prim...