Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural factors that influence communication
Interpersonal communication across cultures
Interpersonal communication across cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural factors that influence communication
Comparison of Australian and Singaporean management styles with each other
Singapore and Australia are two countries located in the South East region of the world. Singapore are considered a part of Asia, while Australia is considered to be a part of the Oceania or the Australasia continent. The two countries are separated by just over 2700 miles, the countries are that not far apart geographically but when it comes to management styles in business activities, the two couldn’t be more dissimilar. Australia is a relaxed and individualistic culture. The manager recognizes that the employees are professionals and they know what they are doing. The manager would spend as little time discussing the way a job needs to be done as possible. He recognizes
…show more content…
Micromanaging the employee makes it harder for the manager to look into all aspects of the job and do his own job at the same time. This also gives the workers very little room to wiggle and do their jobs in their own ways. A manager is the boss and he knows a little bit about most of the things but he would not know the best way of doing all the jobs hence the workers are hired. The people who are more qualified to do their own jobs are given space to do the job in the way they deem best. The working culture in Australia is also very individualistic. People are driven by achievements for themselves. Internal competition between employees is encouraged to motivate them to work harder than they are doing at the moment. The employees are believed to be working for their own benefit first and then for the benefit of the company. It is the job of the manager to manage these employees and create synergies between them to find out the most effective way of making them work together for the greater good of the firm. Change is considered a good thing in Australia. Managers are willing to take the risk of trying something new and taking steps that are risky for the business. The employees considered to be made part …show more content…
The culture in Singapore is very formal, group oriented and much of the communication is done via non-verbal methods. In Singapore, the needs of the group or the company in this case, are given higher preference over the individual needs. The success of company is more important than the work that a person does. Since the culture is very formal, some things are not said by an employee to his manager or by the manager to his employee. Non-verbal cues are to be picked up to see if the employee is happy or not or if the manager is happy or not. A hierarchical structure is used and there is a clearly defined boundary of the individual. The employees are expected to follow this structure within the company and stay within their boundary. Relationships between employees and managers take time to develop and it is considered important that the manager plays close attention to the needs of the employees. The manager should realize that each employee has a part to play in the role of the running of the company. Keeping yourself within the duties of the role brings order within the organization and everything remains in a well defined manner. The managers in Singapore try to keep a general view about the life of the employee outside the organization. The manager tries to learn as much as possible about the family of his subordinate to make sure that he understands that
Australia has gone from a highly centralized wage determination system to a mainly decentralized one. There has been a move away from accords and awards to enterprise bargaining, through the 96 Workplace Relations Act. Recent policies include changes to unfair dismissal claims and the 2005 workplace reforms package.
Australia has many features that some people don’t understand that are amazing and the same thing goes with China. China and Australia are quite alike they both have a large history in languages and lifestyles that can interest a large variety of people.
Shauna is American and has certain values and ideas about work. Shauna is driven by the fact, that results and accomplishments are rewarded in the United States… Shauna feels without achieving a great result, this could be perceived as responsibilities not being met, this in turn could reflect poorly upon Shauna as supervisor. Americans take work very serious and have little patience for wasting time. The fact that the Thai workers were initially welcomed Shauna with an upbeat and polite attitude are a direct reflection of Thai values. Thai people by nature are a non-confrontational group and would be welcoming to Shauna regardless of inter personal feelings. The two opposing views of culture and values will undoubtedly present some challenges
This Journal Report is looking at how the managers work with their employees. It explores the differences people have even those working in the same organisation under the same management. However, this report gives a clear way of effective management. It also explores different ways of dealing with staff members who have different attitudes, values and beliefs, However, all these 3 are very close related.
Internationally speaking, Australia is a slight disadvantage because of its location compared to other developed nations. The majority of global travellers do not typically pass through Australia on-route to another destination; Australia is the end of the line. Cities such as Singapore, Kuala Lumpur and...
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
Organisational Structure, Culture, and Management Style of a Business C2 An Analysis of How the Organisational Structure, Culture And Management Style of the Business Affects its Performance and Operation and Help It to Meet Its Objectives The organisation structure of Wednesbury IKEA The organisation structure in the ‘Appendix section’ belongs to the Wednesbury branch of IKEA. Wednesbury IKEA is a large formal organisation and it is best suited to a hierarchical organisational structure. This is because; there are more employees as it goes downwards from each level.
Comparative advantage means that an industry, firm, country or individual are able to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than others which are also producing the same goods and services. Also, in order to be profitable, the number in exports must be higher than the number in import. From the diagram we seen above, Singapore is seen to have a comparative advantage in some services. The services are Transport, Financial, business management, maintenance & Repair and Advertising & Market Research, etc. These export services to other countries improve the balance of payment. On the other side, Singapore is seen to have a comparative disadvantage in some services. The services are Travel, Telecommunications, Computer & Information,
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches?
This research has asked us to look into three different styles of management and find real life examples of companies or individuals who have or are currently using such styles of management. To begin we will take a look into the use of an autocratic style of management versus a participative. In this portion we will look into Leona Helmsley and her chain of hotels. Once this potion is completed, our next section will be looking into a centralized style of management versus a decentralized style. In this section of the research, we will be looking into Apple Inc and how they have built an empire with a centralized style of managing philosophy. Finally, in the final section of the research we will be taking a look at how Google has created an informal environment in which employees have direct access to executives and have the ability to share thoughts and ideas that are taken serious and to the heart.
When the interaction between the leadership and employees is right, the latter will make a more significant contribution to team communication and collaboration and will also be encouraged to accomplish the mission and objectives assigned by the organization, thereby enhancing job satisfaction. For example, the manager characteristics manners and conduct can affect the way they associate with their employees, but if administrators conventionally adjust their authority conduct to accomplish the mission of the association, this could influence shared regards and feelings to make a strong various leveled culture that creates and achieve a common goal. The culture within an organization is essential, playing a significant role in whether it is a happy and healthy environment in which to work. In communicating and promoting the organizational ethos to employees, their acknowledgment and acceptance of it can influence their work behavior and
Thompson, P & Mchugh, D 2002, Work organisations: A critical introduction, 3rd edn, MacMillan Palgrave, New York, viewed 4 April 2014, http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.uow.edu.au/lib/uow/docDetail.action?docID=10038997&p00=organisational+behaviour.
I have, however, found that while the Culture and Politics of countries differ, the basic necessities and requirements of employees remain similar all over. I have added my experience to the studies and articles and summarised to present them in the Indian environment.
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
In Today’s world, the composition and how work is done has massively changed and is still continuing to change. Work is now more complex, more team base, depends greatly on technological and social skills and lastly more mobile and does not depend on geography. Companies are also opting for ways to help their employees perform their duties effectively so that huge profits are realized in the long term .The changes in the workplaces include Reduction in the structure of the hierarchy ,breakdown in the organization boundaries , improved and better management tactics and perspectives and lastly better workplace condition and health to the employees. (Frank Ackerman, Neva R. Goodwin, Laurie Dougherty, Kevin Gallagher, 2001)