Hyppolite 5 Born Unprivileged ?A Wall of Fire Rising? by Edwidge Danticat and ?King of the Bingo Game? by Ralph Ellison describe two unfortunate and unprivileged men from two different culture facing about similar social challenges throughout their life, and leading each one of them to make separate unreasonable decision in resolving their existing conditions. Both men were unemployed, and they were unable to respond to their family?s need; one?s due to the lack of opportunity, and the other one from being a slave descendant and doesn?t own a birth certificate. Compared to ?The King of the Bing Game? story which is a mixture of sadness, hope, and a bit of happiness. ?A Wall of Fire Rising? is a soul-stirring story where hope and freedom is claimed, but unpleasant life …show more content…
event was more influential. Despite their many similarities, they differ enormously on the way they handle their life challenges; for example, Guy commits suicide to escape his miserable existence while the protagonist in the bingo game story had a more positive attitude toward his misfortune. Our protagonists?
irrational behavior derived from the urge to support their family needs and wellbeing. ?well I ain?t crazy. I?m just broke, ?cause I got no birth certificate to get a job, and Laura ?bout to die cause we got no money for a doctor? (Ellison 606). His main purpose was to win the bingo game to support and pay for Laura?s doctor. During the event of the game, he ends up doing some foolishness by not letting go of the game?s buzzer, making the crowd angry at him ?Come down from there ,you jerk!? ?let somebody else have a chance?.? (Ellipson609). Despite the yelling and the screaming from the crowd, and even by seeing two men in uniform approaching the stage, he still would not let go of the buzzer ?But they?d never get it; he would keep the bingo wheel whirling forever, and Laura would be safe in the wheel. But would she?? (Ellison 611). His action is unbelievable, but he was determined to save Laura whom identity was never mention; she was certainly his wife. Even though he wins the game at the end as he had predicted, he might not collect the money due to his ridiculous behavior; then, all his effort to come down from the south to win the bingo game for Laura is
meaningless. On the other hand, Guy protagonist?s name from ?A Wall of Fire Rising? wishes he can offer his family a better way of living, but the lack of opportunity and resources hold him down. Guy family were very poor; they were living in a one room apartment, they were sleeping on mat, they were not even able to eat a decent meal at times, ?when things were really bad for the family, they boiled clean sugarcane pulp to make what Lili called her special sweet water Tea.? (Danticat 369). Guy was unemployed as well as the bingo game protagonist, but living in an underdeveloped country with a very difficult system makes it even worse for Guy. There were not too many options for him to choose from like the other protagonist who had the opportunity to participate in a game show to win money. Danticat didn?t describe guy?s wife as an unsatisfying person to complain about their misfortune, but Guy was not at peace with himself; he says to his wife one day, ?I know you?re wishing things for me. You want me to work at the mill, you want me to get a pretty house for us. I know you want this thing too, but mostly you want me to feel like a man?. This is the speech of man who worries of his family living condition and was incapable of reversing the situation due the fact he was unable to obtain a decent job at the sugar mill field. Despite the common factor of family needs behind their actions, their perception on how to solve their challenges was done differently. Guy hopes was to obtain a permanent job at the sugar mill field, but it was inaccessible to him ?it was almost six months since the last time Guy gotten work there.? (Danticat 372). Guy was seventy- eight on the sugar mill field?s waiting list for work; when he finally got a temporary job there, it was for him to scrub the toilets. He felt his man pride swept away and diminished. Because of that incident, the consumption to commit suicide was plotting on his head ?how do you think a man is judged after he?s gone?? he asked his wife one night they getting for bed. (Danticat 375). As the family go some night at the sugar mill plantation, Guy was fascinating by the flying balloon own by the Haitian Lebanese descendant ?Sometimes, I just want to take that big balloon and ride it up in the air. I?d like to sail off somewhere else and keep floating until I got to a nice plot of land where I can be something new? (Danticat 375). Finally, one day he took the balloon and flew up in the air, so he got a hint of freedom from his tribulations. The crowd was crying ?Go! Beautiful, go? (Danticat 376). Imagine how he felt up there! Who will ever think he will jump off that balloon? Why? Is it fear of the future? Was he scared of facing reality after having that moment of glory. Guy?s Death might not solve the family issues, they didn?t have enough to survive on a day-to-day basis; and now he left her with funeral to organize and a son to raise by herself. Unlike Guy, the main character from Ellison story; despite of his background of him being a slave descendant, coming from the south with no money, and he was about to lose Laura from sickness, he kept his hopes and expectations within limits, but he had faith that he will get out of situation. When he was on stage, he felt like giving up at some point, but he caught himself and screamed ?live, Laura, baby. I got a holt of it now, sugar. Live! ?he screamed it, tears streaming down his face.? (Ellipson611). Guy could of do the same, keep fighting for his family specially his son?s future, and waiting for his name to be called from the sugar mill job waiting list. Let the flying balloon land and face reality, his wife was very supportive during their trials by reassuring him that there is no dishonest work. among all the perspectives discussed; lack of resources, lack of opportunity, the family that one cannot feed or one cannot respond to medical needs, and unemployment; Now, it is easy to see the real cause behind their life disaster. By judging their action respectively, it is hard to blame one and praise the other one for his act of bravery. It looks like ?family? was the center of both men preoccupation; however, their responses toward these challenges to overcome their family needs are unlike. Were both protagonist born unprivileged? yes, they were, it plays a major role in shaping their destiny and the cause of their misfortune. With one who commits suicide and the other one foolishness act will bring him back right where he started broke with no money to pay for Laura doctor?s. However, a born unprivileged individual life doesn?t have to follow an unordinary path like these men in Edwidge Danticat and Ralph Ellison story. Works Cited Danticat, Edwidge. ?A Wall of Fire Rising.? The Norton Introduction to Literature. Shorter 12th ed., edited by Kelly J. Mays, Norton,2016, pp.366-378. Ellison, Ralph. ?The King of the Bingo Game.? The Norton Introduction to Literature. Shorter 12th ed., edited by Kelly J. Mays, Norton,2016, pp. 605-612. 5
A Wall of Fire Rising, written by Edwidge Danticat, is a story about a small, poor family of three that live in Haiti. The family is composed of Guy, the father, Lili, the mother, and Little Guy, their son. Throughout the entirety of the story, the story provides the reader with in-depth details about each one of the main characters. Lili and Little Guy can fully be understood early in the story and are static characters, but the same cannot be said for Guy. although the reader is giving information about Guy early on, he he quickly changes in this story. In A Wall of Fire Rising, Lili and Little Guy are static characters, while Guy is a dynamic character, and through his action the reader can see there is more in life that he wants for his family.
Thus, both novels, full of tragedy and sorrow, began with the promise of new land, new beginnings and a better life, but all three were impossible to find within the pages of these novels. In the end, it was broken relationships, broken families, broken communities, but most importantly, broken dreams and broken hopes that were left on the final pages of both woeful, yet celebrated, stories.
Screaming, yelling, and screeching emerge from Tessi Hutchinson, but the town remains hushed as they continue to cast their stones. Reasonably Tessi appears as the victim, but the definite victim is the town. This town, populated by rational people, stones an innocent woman because of a lottery. To make matters worse, no one in the town fathoms why they exterminate a guiltless citizen every June. The town’s inexplicable behavior derives from following an ancient, ludicrous tradition. With the omission of one man, no one in the community comprehends the tradition. In the case of “The Lottery,” the town slays an irreproachable victim each year because of a ritual. Shirley Jackson exposes the dangers of aimlessly following a tradition in “The Lottery.” Jackson not only questions the problem, but through thorough evaluation she an deciphers the problem as well.
Racism is the main reason the man is denied his outright victory in the game. Luck strikes when he least expected. When the Bingo game begins and he is “smiling” (Ellison 469) and seizing this opportunity to solve his problems. Unable to secure a job in the North, his participation in bingo gives him the hopes that win the lottery would give him money to save Laura,
The short story ‘The Lottery’ reveals a village of 300 that assemble for a lottery on June 27th every year. The lottery has been held this day for years and years, and has become a classic tradition. The lottery itself is holy to much of its residents, like Mr. Watson, who states that the village in the north is a pack of young crazy fools for removing the lottery. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanti...
“A Wall of Fire Rising” is a story of poor peasant working man named Guy who is trying all his best to provide a decent living and a sincere meal and also desired the need to escape their native country for the greener meadows in America.
First, the main character, he is in a terrible situation, far from home, hungry, poor and his wife may die due to illness. We don't know his full past ,or know how much he or Laura’s hardships can be related to race. the author tells a story of an unfortunate individual who has suffered, and that the bingo game represents his chances of escaping his situation. As the author goes on to explain, "He felt a profound sense of promise, as though he were about to be repaid for all the things he'd suffered all his life. Trembling, he pressed the button" (42). If we look back at the time and the age of this short story his race and suffering are associated with one another. The bingo game comes off as a means for the main character to overcome and rise above his unpleasant situation. Our main characters luck is only temporary, because, Policemen come into play and fight the button away from him and beat him over the head. “Regardless, the main character is still the focus of the unfair world and a system in which he lives. The wheel lands on the evidently winning "double zero," but that's unluckily exactly the amount of money he is going to get” ("Protagonist in King of the Bingo Game.”). With still being broke, he will not have enough money to pay Laura's medical bills. By the end of the story, the main character is in an even worse situation than where
Ralph Ellison’s “King of the Bingo Game” is the story about an unnamed black man, in the 1930’s, who is hoping to win the bingo game that is being held at the local cinema, in order win enough money to pay for his gravely ill wife to see a doctor. The central idea of this story is about race, and the inability for a person to be the master of his or her own destiny, when they live in an unfair and prejudicial system.
Altho somewhat similar the two stories are very different in many ways. The first story is called “Mystery of Heroism” by Stephen Crane and the other one is “To Build a Fire” by Jack London. Both of the books are part of the short story genre and realism stories. The author's purpose for writing the “Mystery of Heroism” is to tell a story about a brave man who went to get water for a dying man. The purpose for writing “To Build a Fire” is to tell about a man and his dog and how he tried to fight the below freezing temperatures to stay alive. Both authors use realism because they want to tell real stories about people and how they had to overcome struggles in their lifetime. These two stories have similarities but they are way more different than anything else. One of the stories is about a man who has to overcome fear to get water for a man.
Jackson’s story presents the issue regarding the habit of turning a blind eye to another’s horrid treatment, if not for anything but for the sake of ritualistic tradition. Mrs. Hutchinson ran into the event late, laughing that she had “[c]lean forgotten what day it was” (Jackson 292). After that, Mr. Summers, the officiator of the lottery, calls out names of the people who are unable to attend the lottery, and asks for the person who will be drawing for them. There were two people missing, Clyde Dunbar, who had broken his leg, and the Watson’s mother. Dunbar’s wife was drawing for him, and it seemed that she was unhappy that she was the one handed this task.
This essay has compared the differences between the societies in these two novels. There is one great similarity however that both make me thankful for having been born into a freethinking society where a person can be truly free. Our present society may not be truly perfect, but as these two novels show, it could be worse.
As soon as all the families had drawn, no one moved. Everyone just stood still waiting to see who got picked to be in the final drawing. "Then the voices began to say, `It's Hutchinson. It's Bill,' `Bill Hutchinson got it (The Lottery, pg. 5)." From a readers point of view this would be the greatest thing that could have ever happened to them, but not in this case. Moving forward in the story, Mrs. Hutchinson is found yelling, "It wasn't fair!" and "You didn't give him time to choose any paper he wanted (The Lottery, pg. 5)." People in the crowd were telling her to "be a good sport. All of us took the same chance (The Lottery, pg. 5)." Mrs. Hutchinson did not like the responses at all. She even demanded that her married daughter draw in the final round with them. This was only to lessen her chances of getting picked in the end.
This simple short story bleeds into the minds of its readers, and mixes into our perception of the world we know today. Eventually, the reader begins to connect the thought process and ideologies of the mentally deranged villagers within the story to those who exist or existed within the real world. We begin to peel away at our own society, and see that the same way of thinking which spawned these lotteries, held within the fictional world, may have counterparts in the real world, which is the truly perturbing fragment of this story. While each person who reads this tale...
The struggles both characters face demonstrate character development and contribute to the themes of the stories. Both short stories prove to be literally effective in that they disclose the main themes at the outset of each story. Although the themes may alter over the course of the stories, they are clearly defined in their respective introductions.
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically