Company Q's Approach To Social Responsibility

Social responsibility is an ethical basis for organizations; they are required to act for the benefit of humanity in general. It is a responsibility that all individuals have to do to keep a sense of balance between the economy and every ecological system. This obligation can be passive, by evading involvement in socially harmful acts, or active, by doings things that directly advance social goals. In evaluating Company Q’s approach regarding social responsibility I can conclude that it isn’t responsible at all. Company Q is an undersized native grocery store in a major residential zone. This company has lately shut down two stores, due to high crimes in the area, and loses of money. They have also begun to offer a very restricted quantity

He is concerned over lost profits as a result of possible theft by staffs who claim they are donating the food. The fact that they are allowing the food to be disposed instead of giving it to local food banks isn’t social responsible but is immoral tactic to social responsibility. The manager preferred profits over people which isn’t right. He/she is still losing money because they’re throwing away the food, so why should it matter. The reputation of social responsibility between industries has turn out to be a subject of community debate in today’s world. Numerous corporations are peregrinating a wall among what is gregariously responsible comportment and what is boldly and in plain view turning a back on the local communities. As community members, they have a responsibility to do whatever they can do to make as big as possible their effect on their native neighborhoods in a optimistic approach, all while making something as small as possible the negative as superlative as they are able to. The more social responsible the business is the more the community will give

Company Q has closed down store in high crime areas because of theft. They ought to focus on creating a non-delinquent location for the area and for store workers rather than merely slashing shortfalls and go out of business. They could place security devices such as cameras and alarms. Offering high margins items that are only sold sometimes, also losses revenue because they have to donate them. Not all people can afford such items. Company Q should offer instead a more viable option of products. Selling high margin items can be a positive thing for the company, which is expensive, is like monopolizing the consumer’s health in exchange for higher profit retention. Crafty, but not very social responsible. Lastly, Company Q is already losing money by throwing away the food, so they just might as well donate it to the local banks. The manager can monitor the employees by having them turn in a receipt from the bank states the donation. If the employees know that the food is being monitored and logged, it would discourage them from stealing it. It would eliminate waste, and in return could later be used for tax right offs, and benefit the store. Donating the food could have a huge impact in the community helping those who cannot afford to provide their families with meals. “A man is called