Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of organization culture
Impact of organization culture
Impact of organization culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of organization culture
Communicating Change
Machiavelli once said “There is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle than to initiate a new order of things”. Change is necessary in business, but it is also necessary to properly communicate that change. Taking the culture of an organization into consideration is necessary when making changes that will affect the corporate structure. The purpose of this paper is to give an example of an organizational change that occurred, and analyze the effectiveness of communication that occurred leading up to this change.
Incident
One of the key purposes of a business is to make money. If the business is not making money then there will need to be a change for the business to survive. Besides the aspect of making money change will often save time, “without change, business leaders still would be dictating correspondence to secretaries, editing their words and sending them back to the drawing board, wasting time for all involved” (Richards, 2014, para. 2). This section will relay a story of organizational change.
Change
Cheith Kerry was the service writer, and manager in a small used car dealership. His job was to manage the workflow, recruit new customers, and keep the mechanics making money. Cheith had been working this company for nearly 8 months, and thought he really knew how things worked. He had hired a new employee to replace the one that had quit, and things seemed to be going well. He had even found a way to save some money by outsourcing a few jobs to some friends of his, even though this had never been done within the company. The only thing that was not working in Cheith’s favor was there was no new work coming in, the only people brin...
... middle of paper ...
...t is essential to the health of an organization that all the ways be considered before change is instituted. Communicating with employees is not an arbitrary concept, but rather one that all managers must practice on a daily basis. When communication is healthy, change is more likely to be healthy as well. The purpose of this paper was to give an example of an organizational change that occurred, and analyze the effectiveness of communication that occurred leading up to this change.
Works Cited
Burke, W. W. (2002). Organization change Theory and practice. New Delhi, India: SAGE publications.
Clampitt, P. G. (1991). Communicating for managerial effectiveness (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Richards, L. (2014). Why is change important in an organization. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/change-important-organization-728.html
Lashinger et al highlights the need for communication within leadership as effective communication is essential to influence change and motivate others. Emphasising the need for communicating effectively towards all staff members, whilst undergoing change to ensure all staff feel supported and understand the process, allowing implementation to be more successful.
Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
It is important that if you are ever running a business, you change before the change comes to you. Change can have either a positive or negative effect on a business and it is extremely important to strive to make it a positive
The third Case Study “Home Depot’s Blueprint for Culture Change” studied Mr. Robert Nardelli’s role as the CEO of Home Depot. He approached management in an autocratic style, which was criticized by many. This paper will take a look at how Mr. Nardelli’s style follows Kotter and Cohen’s model of change.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Kotter, JP 1995, Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. In Harvard Business Review on Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Promote communication within an organization vertically and horizontally while balancing various management and operational elements;
When organizational change proves necessary, all people at all levels of the organization should address change as a “how,” “what,” and “why” problem in order for the change to be sustained over time.
It is important to identify some of the problems an organization may have and go in and analyze them. There are many techniques that can be approached to help gain businesses people side of management like improving rapid response to customer service needs, low employee output, and costs. Change is not easy for some people, so making sure employees understand why change is needed helps people to become more aware and have the time to adjust or process those changes.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Hayes (2014), encourages change managers to keep an open line of communication with employees. Although these ones may not agree or support the upcoming change, they value the information being given to them at the onset and may eventually tolerate or accept the change. Therefore, it is important for change managers to not only communicate with employees, but provide relevant information, as the quality of the communication is of the utmost importance.
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...
As in all aspects of personal and professional life, having effective communication is a key element of success. Effective communication can benefit your relationships with people. By conveying your message and integrating them as a member of the team and not just a subordinate leads to better production. By effectively communicating you can clearly define job responsibilities and expectations. The better you are able to communicate the less likely organizational turnover of personnel will occur. Supervisors and leaders in the professional workplace find that the most important factor in advancement and retain ability is effective communication. Senior level executives and human resources managers are stressing the importance of communication and providing more training for mid-level management. Emphasis is placed on communication being clear by being transmitted strongly.