Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences and similarities between common law and civil law
Judicial decision making
Common Law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Common law is “judge made-law” and “includes law by judges when they interpret law (lecture notes, 11/16)”. Common law authors trusted that “natural law was too abstract and theoretical for their pragmatic, concretely focused minds…simply out of touch with concrete human affairs (Coleman 593)”. Therefore, common law was developed.
Common law has various aspects than the basic definition would anticipate. One imperative attribute is the progression of common law. Common law logicians believed that the law was constant, and they believed that looking into the law deeper and relying on reasoning would give an answer. Although common law has altered with time, “through these changes it maintained its integrity as a single, coherent body of law
…show more content…
Hale explained that common law reasoning was analytical, “arguing from one case to the next on the basis of perceived likeliness and differences and the location of the instant case in the landscape of common experience painted by the judge or lawyer in command of the full resources of the common law (Coleman 594)”. Hale also coined common reason, as artificial reasoning, and the analogical element was a feature of artificial reasoning. Hale believed that common law is shared and is an “intellectual competence, a discoursive faculty that that is learned through participation in practice of public forensic argument, situated in and moving about in a world of recorded experience of ‘human affairs and conversation’ (Coleman 595)”. The aspect of precedent in common law held that “no single judicial ruling has the authority of the law just in virtue of the judges having decided it, and future judges are free to test a prior court’s formulation of a rule or doctrine…in light of the legal community’s shared sense of reasonableness (Coleman 596)”. However, judge’s decisions did play an imperative role in common law. Hale states, “Although judicial decisions fail to make law properly so called, ‘they have great weight and authority in expounding, declaring, and publishing what the law of the kingdom is’ (Coleman
The merits of both the adversarial and inquisitorial system will be explored throughout this paper. The Australian rule of law best describes as all law should be applied equally and fairly. The five vital operations of the rule of law includes fairness, rationality, predictability, consistency, and impartially. The adversarial system adopts these operations by having a jury decide on the verdict and the judge being an impartial decision maker. In contrast, the inquisitorial system relies heavily on the judge. This can result in abusive power and bias of the judge when hearing evidence and delivering verdicts. The operations of the rule of law determine why the rule of law is best served by the adversarial system in Australia.
Legislation and the Common law are not separate and independent sources of law. They exist in a symbiotic relationship. Symbiotic relationship refers to the two different sources of legal norms that provide the sum of rules establish system as a whole. (Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512, 532 [31])
The valid point is concerned with Goodhart’s article “Determining the Ratio Decidedi of a Case. Simpson accepts the Goodhart theory proposition that ‘‘the ratio decidendi of a case can be defined as the material facts of the case plus the decision thereon.” He points out that there is an opposed theory, which maybe conveniently called ‘classical theory’ which is that “the ratio is ‘the principle of law which the judge considered necessary to his decision.’’ The Supreme Court’s approach to the illegality defence in decisions, bringing tension in judicial decision between the need for legal certainty and need to achieve fair result. Therefore, quantitative research on whether extra-legal factors influenced judicial decision making has found no universally applicable answers as some variables can explain certain judicial behaviour in some situations but, both in others. When interpreting and applying legislations, to decided case, especially when cases involve ambiguous aspect of a statute which is statutory interpretation; which over time, various methods and construction has fallen in and out of favour including the primary rules (literal,mischief
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
The Family Law Legislation Amendment Act of 2011 and whether it has Reduced Violence and Abuse for Women and Children
of law has proved to be confusing to both juries and judges due to the
Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is what is known as an ‘Original Precedent’ that is a case that creates and applies a new rule. Precedents are to be found in Law Reports and are divided up into ‘Binding’ and ‘Persuasive’.
It was created with the idea that as the law was handed down from the King’s Courts, it represented the common custom of the people; Developing from three English Crown courts of the 12th and 13th centuries who started deciding in disputes were local or manorial courts had jurisdiction before: The Exchequer, The King’s Bench and the Common Pleas. Usually, there are no formal codes, texts or regulations that common law relies on
The English legal system is ostensibly embedded on a foundation of a ‘high degree of certainty with adaptability’ based on a steady ‘mode’ of legal reasoning. This rests on four propositions
This essentially means that laws in statute, and in common law cannot determine the eventual outcome of new cases. They argue, ‘that legal questions lack single right answers. In adjudication, law is indeterminate to the extent that authoritive legal materials and methods permit multiple outcomes to lawsuits.’ CLS scholars believe that ‘legal reasoning’ is simply the manipulation of abstract categories, with no particular perspective being obviously correct. In law, they argue that there are multiple abstract categories that are open to manipulation.
Common law is the concept that some of the core principles that form the basis of the English legal system come from judges as opposed to Parliament, with rulings from case to case developing predicedent, which forces lower courts to follow princaples set by higher cores but allows higher courts to overrule the descisions of lower courts. This allows the courts, over time to refine law. The courts can even decide to ignore rulings when considering to set it as precident with enough justification, this allows rooms for special cases. As a drawback to common law, the courts are sometimes unwilling to overrule long standing precidents. Slapper,...
Firstly in this report, I will be giving the different definitions of rule of law by different philosophers; secondly, I will be applying the rule of law to the English Legal system and thirdly I will be explaining separation of powers with a focus on the impartial judiciary. Finally, I will be using cases to support every detailed point given.
Should the aim of law be primarily focused on the protection of individual liberty or, instead, the normative goals aimed at the good of the society? The question of law and morality is difficult mainly because it needs to be addressed with current social conditions that exist, the morals and values that the particular society has. In general, the laws in any society should not only be focused on regulations, but it should also protect individual’s liberty. Devlin debate was based on deciding whether law should enforce morality. He debated about what the law ought to be and whether morality should be enforced by law to form a good society. Furthermore, John Stewart Mill did not write specifically on law and morality. His argument constituted mainly on the anti-enforcers side of law and morality because he believed in individual liberty. John Stuart Mill's assertion that the only justification for limiting one person's liberty is to prevent harm to another
The relationship between law and morality has been argued over by legal theorists for centuries. The debate is constantly be readdressed with new cases raising important moral and legal questions. This essay will explain the nature of law and morality and how they are linked.