Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racism and comedy
When writing a joke, a comedian must often consider which subjects can and cannot be joked about. As our contemporary society becomes more politically correct, people have become more defensive about their own beliefs and morals. Most people love comedy laughter. But when the topic of the joke goes against their own convictions, it loses its humor. As sensitivity to certain topics increases, comedians have needed to adjust their delivery of jokes. Comedians can use a variety of delivery tactics to lighten the mood of a heavy topic. In some ways, addressing controversial subjects comically can actually produce more laughs than the light-hearted, fun-loving topics that used to be prominent in comedy. Comedians ask themselves if there is a specific …show more content…
In some respects, comedians need to assimilate to the audience's attitude towards their material in order to not be overly offensive. To accomplish this comedic conformity, comedians often use deliveries and personal experiences to make a joke non-offensive towards any one person, and often turn the joke against themselves. As more controversial issues appear within society, the public has become more politically correct and critical. Although comedians can use a comedic relief approach to convert controversial topics to acceptable subjects, the argument can be made that certain material is too offensive to joke about. While some jokes are too offensive to tell, one can assert that abhorrent, crude, and socially disputed jokes have more potential to capture the attention of the audience and become critically …show more content…
Many comedians have discovered that raunchy, controversial, and somewhat offensive topics such as race, religion, and sexuality make the best jokes because they are uncomfortable to discuss in society. They use the forum of the stage to discuss subjects that one would usually be thought of as argument-inducing and contentious. With the right context and delivery, comedians are able to convey a playful perception on topics that would usually be taboo and possibly offensive to the average person. Because of the pre-existing opinions that the audience may possess on the subject, the comedian is compelled to walk the thin line between controversial and offensive. The comedian is not trying to contradict anyone’s opinions in an offensive way, but to allow the audience to experience the topic through the comedian's perspective. After 9/11 many Muslim American comedians, such as Azhar Usman, changed their stand-up routines to not only address contemporary perceptions of Muslim Americans also spread knowledge of the struggles of being Muslim American in a humorous way. “Interestingly, this comedy is meant not only to entertain but also to address certain outsider attitudes held about Muslims and insider attitudes amongst Muslims…. The social messages delivered in jokes that are opportunities for comedians to promote social cohesion
My humor consists mainly of a mix of high and low comedy, and sarcasm. One element of humor that does not appeal to is caricatures. An example of this is a terrorist joke. The terrorist was holding a pencil and saying “Where is the trigger?” exaggerating the fact that, in the news we hear about terrorism, and when the terrorists come to America they would not be able to decipher the language or the meaning of objects. The joke did not appeal to me in anyway and didn’t make sense. A certain part of an element of humor that does not appeal to is disgusting anecdotes. In the passage, Brothers by Jon Scieszka, a family goes on a roadtrip and stopover to eat. A brother drops a piece of candy and the cat eats it and yacks it up. “Tom burped a bit of Stuckey lunch back on Gregg.” The bodily functions and them throwing up and spilling out of the puke wagon had made me lose my appetite for lunch.
Bernie Mac’s second Def Comedy Jam special, “I Ain’t Scared of You Motherfuckers” is a comedic work that has always made me laugh uncontrollably. Even when I was too young to fully understand most of the jokes in that particular standup routine, his physical motions, use of curses and taboo sex phrases, as well as his urban Chicago colloquialisms were enough to have tears dripping from my eyes and a boisterous sound of laughter coming from my mouth, loud enough that it would cause my mother to come into my room and investigate what all the fuss was about. Despite the obvious comedic subject matter of works of comedy done by comedians such as Bernie Mac, there are numerous underlying reasons that attribute to the humor that is expressed through our laugher and enjoyment. Through his lively stage presences and sociological motifs, Bernie Mac was able to enlighten the world on the various cultural aspects of urban life by his use of social and psychological cues that capture our attention, giving us directions on how to react, providing us with an increased social awareness though satirical methods, and making light of taboo topics regarding the themes of sex and gender roles.
For example, the comedy shows The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon expresses satirical humor concerning politics. His show also demonstrates political satire by telling jokes and even impersonating political figures for the audience. He creates humor through sarcasm that focuses on real issues. His sarcastic humor causes others to feel more confident in their criticism toward politicians. For example, “Jimmy Fallon expresses his humor about Donald Trump, impersonating his appearance and imitating his voice while talking about politics. He uses his humor by impersonating Donald Trump and his sweeping generalizations with Madea (Rogo).” Jimmy Fallon shows people his views through humor and it creates a sense of community to express their agreeable and disagreeable views. As we discussed some ideas about satirical humor that affects political changes, it was important to reveal their feelings about changes in life and drove them to look upon their society or government more
Psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists study humor because it is a fundamental culture value, but they still can’t determine why certain things make some people laugh and others not. There are “humor quotient” tests that are designed to measure an individual’s sense of humor, but these tests are questionable. These tests aren’t accurate because almost all humor depends on cultural background knowledge and language skills. Not every person in the whole world, or even in one country share the same background knowledge and skills, therefore they cannot have the same type of humor. “The fact remains that individuals vary in their appreciation of humor” (Rappoport 9). Since humor varies from individual to individual, humor lies in the individual. How successful or funny a joke is depends on how the person receives the joke, humor cannot be measured by a statistical
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
In the beginning of the article, Lukianoff and Haidt explain how one word can offend a college student really quickly, even if the person saying it didn’t intend to insult them. The authors then tell the audience how popular comedians, like Chris Rock, have stopped performing on college campuses, because the students cannot take a joke.
According to Everything’s an Argument by Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz, “Humor has always played an important role in argument…” (38). Humor itself is something that activates amusement or laughter. Moreover, in popular culture satire is a tool that is used to point out things in our society. Satire opens the minds of people to philosophies they might completely deny, using humor. There are many elements of satire that identify flaws within our society. A couple of satire elements that will be discussed are irony and exaggeration. In addition, a parody is used in popular culture as a way to mock or mimic situation or person.
Humor can come in many different forms. Many people are aware of the blatant humor of slapstick, but it takes a keener mind to notice the subtle detail in sarcasm or satire. In A Modest Proposal, Jonathan Swift was able to create a piece of literature addressing the faults of the Irish culture while embedding in a humorous essay. Swift’s satire allows for the gravity of the Irish standings to be exploited under the disguise of a proposal for economic benefit.
Humor is more than just amusing entertainment to pass the time. Though jokes and witty banter can be shallow, humor can go deeper than surface level to convey messages to audiences who would otherwise be close-minded about certain ideas. Humor is a great tool to get audiences to change the way they think, feel, and act. In “Saying Goodbye to Yang,” Alexander Weinstein uses humor to criticize some of society’s faults, such as the way it has become heavily reliant on technology, racially insensitive, and judgmental. As technology advances, people are adapting and becoming more reliant upon it.
The majority of comedy is centered on identity. Comedy, like many other aspects of different cultures contains barriers that are broken only by an understanding of the context of the comedy. In order words, it is unlikely that an African would fully understand a joke by an American comedian if the joke draws from a primarily American historical or social context. Hence, what one can identify with affects what kind of jokes one can relate to. Identity is predicated on the ability to relate because identities are formed through personal interpretations of the environment one finds himself or herself in. These personal interpretations can be highly influenced by a manipulation of the context or amount of representation. Using Bigsby and Ruckus
In Alain de Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he argues that the aim of humorists is not solely entertainment, but also to convey a message that isn’t always okay to state directly. There are many places where his argument can apply. Even with humor, some topics are still too controversial to joke about; However, in most cases, humor can lighten things up and make it easier to discuss topics that otherwise would not be as easy to talk about without heavy arguments. There are many cases that would make his argument true. There are many examples that support his argument, and that help to show the importance of humor in arguing, including cartoons, comics, works of literature, and also when thinking of hosts of television programs.
We often hear offensive jokes based on stereotypes. While living in the United States I have encountered many offensive jokes and statements stereotyping either my religion or ethnicity. Due to the 9/11 attack American citizens developed a bias against Muslim Arabs and throughout time stereotypes started to appear about my beliefs and people. One of the most common stereotypes which many offensive jokes are based on is that Arab Muslims are perceived as dangerous terrorists. After experiencing many similar situations, I came upon a process that can effectively prove and persuade that the stereotype is not correct. It also helps with explaining the resentment or discomfort cause by the offensive statement in a proper way. People handle such situations differently, but the purpose of their different processes should have the same positive result. Since the offensive jokes and statements are based on stereotypes, it is more effective to correct the information in the stereotype rather than responding to the joke. The following process is a way to solve offensive stereotype situations in a healthy and effective manner weather it was in public, or private.
James Conroy argues that laughter in serious topics has been regarded through the ages as dangerous, deviant, and subversive; yet equally as refreshing, challenging, and constructive. Political humor is extensively used in almost all countries, but political satire is perceived differently from one country to another. The research question is as follows: what factors make political satire an effective tool that affects politics and policy? I argue that humor is more influential when blended with serious topics, such as international relations or politics. Laughter is a great means to put serious topics under the lenses of critical thinking. The use of humor, and political satire specifically can bring about serious political change. Humor can play all sorts of roles in the political process through being informative, educational and influential while keeping its captive entertaining
A comedian’s job is to make people laugh and have a good time. Sometimes comedians use techniques that offend people which is called controversial comedy. Controversial comedy is a technique called insult comedy used by comedians which usually tends to make negative remarks about a group or individuals. I have been studying A comedian named Maz Jobrani he uses his stand up to put a positive light on muslims because many think all muslims are terrorist. The truth is he says jokes about Iran which if you live in Iran you would think it is offensive because he puts Iran as a bad place some agree with that and some do not.
You can find wide varieties of these crude pieces on the internet, and it is not uncommon to hear them in the hallways of schools, or whispered among students and followed by unjustified giggles. Attempting to lighten the seriousness of things such as sexual assault or terrorism is not comedy, no matter what people may say. Comedy is about laughing with the people being mocked, not lessening the seriousness of their situations. When we try to make ‘jokes’, we must keep one thing in mind: comedy is about laughter and joy. A joke is only funny when it is not blinding us to the reality of cruel