Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial prejudice in the court system
Criminal justice system racism united states
Racial prejudice in the court system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial prejudice in the court system
Our society defines our relationships through hierarchies. We have those who are powerful and those who are powerless. These ideas of power stem from a long history of the past and present both being deeply intertwined with each other. The criminal justice system, despite being a place where supposedly all are equal in the eyes of the law, is an institution where power is the greatest tool of all. Our thoughts about power and how we perceive it come together here in this institution. In Colum McCann Let the Great World Spin, Philippe, a white man, walks on a tightrope between the two twin towers, trespassing into the property as well as endangering the lives of others below him. Tillie, a black woman, is accused of stealing from a man who had …show more content…
Despite this, Philippe's punishment was significantly different than Tillie's in that he was let off loosely only having to pay a penny for each floor of the tower while Tillie was sentenced to eight months in prison. If we closely look at the way Solomon interacted with them it's clear that Philippe and Tillie were viewed vastly differently in his eye.
When Tillie is first presented to the court, Solomon initial reaction is poor. He notices the color of her skin immediately and assumes that she is a prostitute by the way she is dressed. Without even understanding her situation, he already presents himself with a negative perception of her that is only skin deep (McCann, Let the Great World Spin). He draws a connection between blackness and criminality and doesn't even give it a second thought. This racist connection comes from subtle assumptions and deeply rooted fears (The Color of Justice crf-usa.org). And while unintentional, it speaks a lot about society as a whole. If a judge, who is supposed to be fair and impartial, makes a racist assumption, then what does that say about the rest of society? This type of racism is deeply embedded in American society and is invisible to us because it all comes from the subconscious mind. We let
…show more content…
Power can be defined in many different ways, but ultimately, it is about how we interact with our surroundings. However, power is problematic and yet we ignore its long abuse towards different groups of people. The criminal justice system reinforces the notion of power and its ability to make or break a person's life. But that's the norm. That's how it has always been. But why? Perhaps it's because of our long-standing history of white supremacy and how those ideas have seeped into our institutions. Perhaps it's because we feel the need for there to always be an authoritative voice. Perhaps it's because of our own selves and the fact that we believe what society tells us. And while these are only suggestions, the fact is that race plays into every single one of them. We cannot ignore race and pretend it does not exist. It consumes our daily lives. It is part of who we are and who we are as a society. The criminal justice system is an institution that works against minorities and yet we still believe that justice will be served under this system. It is a corrupt system that has to be changed but can only change with the entire population because that is how power works. Power is something we have set up as a society to fill our own needs and pleasure and we must change the way we interpret power. Power is not something to be abused. It is not something that should give us satisfaction.
...system that has existed in the United States or anywhere else in the world” (Alexander 234). W.E.B. Dubois argued that “The burden belongs to the nation, and the hands of none of us are clean if we bend not our energies to righting these great wrongs” (Alexander 217). Our nation must address this burden and correct that racial injustices created by our so-called criminal justice system. The criminal justice system cannot continue to hide behind the front of being a colorblind system - racial inequality and injustice must be challenged.
Power can be defined as the ability to influence or outright control the behavior of people. A variety of different things can drive power, including both knowledge and experience. Power in most cases is needed to establish authority. In today’s country, the United States government has a lot of power. It has so much power that even American citizens are beginning to complain about it. Having all this power and authority has allowed the government to make decisions quicker. However, by making decisions faster, some mistakes can be made and innocent people can be convicted. This point is directly exemplified when using two New Yorker articles, “Surviving Solitary” and ‘A Shot to The Heart.” Both articles consist of results produced quite
The criminal justice system is united under one basic law body, in which no racism is present. Personal beliefs and anecdotes prove nothing, the criminal justice system isn’t racist. Although it may seem African Americans are highly discriminated upon in the justice system, there is ample amounts of data to prove otherwise. The criminal justice system is united under one basic law body, in which no racism is present. The system is not to blame for the racial differences found in the United States criminal justice system. The racial issues found in the system are due to inner city isolation and common crime patterns involving drugs even if it may seem as if the system is racist.
Power. It is defined as the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. Throughout time, certain individuals have acquired power in their society as a way to govern and keep order among their community. Power is not a new concept; it was used in the past by many emperors, kings, and queens, and is still being used by presidents, prime ministers, and dictators. Although, it has been used to further progress societies into what the world is like today, not all power has been used for the best of mankind. But what goes awry to make power turn corrupt? In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it is illustrated how power can turn corrupt, when authoritative figures, who possess power, abuse it for their personal gain, rather than for the common good of the society.
Power has been defined as the psychological relations over another to get them to do what you want them to do. We are exposed to forms of power from the time of birth. Our parents exercise power over us to behave in a way they deem appropriate. In school, teachers use their power to help us learn. When we enter the work world the power of our boss motivates us to perform and desire to move up the corporate ladder so that we too can intimidate someone with power one day. In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness Kurtz had a power over the jungle and its people that was inexplicable.
In modern-day America the issue of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system is controversial because there is substantial evidence confirming both individual and systemic biases. While there is reason to believe that there are discriminatory elements at every step of the judicial process, this treatment will investigate and attempt to elucidate such elements in two of the most critical judicial junctures, criminal apprehension and prosecution.
Firstly, a person’s race comes into play too often. People of color are more likely to entangle themselves in the justice system. Consider that the arrest rate and disparity of African American and Hispanic people are much higher. Police “stops and searches” are proof of racial profiling. A study conducted in Connecticut proved the racial disparity by showing that more people of specific races are pulled over during the day, but not at night because they cannot be seen. Also, a glimpse at the people serving time provides a vivid example of the racial inequalities seen throughout legal situations. When the Brown vs Board of Education case was won, there was around 100,000 African Americans in jail and currently there are at least 800,00 in prison. Black men are six times more likely to get incarcerated as white men and Hispanics are 2.3 times more likely (“18 Examples of”). Additionally, before the sentencing even begins these individuals are at a disadvantage. These communities have worse odds of making bail, in contrast to white defendants. This implies that they include the greater parts of those who are imprisoned before their trial even begins, placing even the innocent in jail for longer than needed. Overall, a person’s race or skin color should not produce a lower quality of
When a person of color is being sentenced the unjustness of sentencing is blatantly shown such as in the article Race Sentencing and Testimony which stated, “ These scholars conclude that black male arrestees “face significantly more severe charges conditional on arrest offense and other observed characteristics” and attribute this primarily to prosecution charging decisions” (Mauer 4). This piece of writing explains that for no other reason than race do these people get convicted far more significantly than others who have the same charge but are white, which continues as far as giving a person of color the max sentence that they can have on a certain charge just for the color of their skin. The justice system has turned into the opposite of what it claims to be and continues to grow as a racist overseer, bashing down on those that they believe should be punished as harshly as possible simply for the color of their skin. The system has gone as deep as to making it so that even if a person has not committed a crime, but are being charged for it they can agree to a plea bargain, which makes it so even though the person did not do it the system is going to have them convicted of it anyway (Quigley 1). “As one young man told me ‘who wouldn’t rather do three years for a crime they didn’t commit than risk twenty-five years
All people have power, some people are just more powerful than others. Having power is the ability to create change. Examples of power being used wrongly is during the French revolution, and the residential school crisis. During the French revolution, two examples were shown of people abusing their power. King Louie XVI raised taxes so that he could buy things that he and his wife Marie Antoinette wanted, and took away rights from the third estate. In the residential schools crisis, the teachers, priests and nuns had power over the students and abused the students in different ways. Superior people take away the rights from those who are below them, but they end up corrupt.
The power often causes people to fail in reaching their goals by manipulating others. Consequently, people lose their power when misused. All in all, the loss of power is caused by abusing it by controlling
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
Power is authority and strength, which is any form of motive force or energy, ability to act, or control. When too much power is given, a dictatorship government can form, in which all decisions are made by one authority. In the book Animal Farm, by George Orwell the author portrays how “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton).
The term power has a variety of definitions. According to the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, the first definition of power refers to “the ability or capacity to act or do something effectively”, also include “a capacity, faculty, or aptitude,” (“power. (n.d.)
Power; “The ability to do something or act in a particular way, especially as faculty or quality.” and “The capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. ” Power is a concept that appears in daily life. Since power allows oneself to control something, it is very hard to let go of that entitlement, leading others to feel victimization.
Power is the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others, or the course of events. Somehow it became something that people have fought for, ever since human existent. Naturally, our sense of competition and greed causes us to want more and more of it. The question of whether or not a person should have too much power, became controversial. Some people believe that it’s no big deal, and is completely necessary.