Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of wildfires
Essay on why wildfires occur
Essay on Effects of Wildfires on Forest Ecosystems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of wildfires
The Environmental & Economic Effects of Wildfires in Colorado Springs
The potential for wildfires has increased in the Western United States over the last several years. Scientists and researchers tout climate change with increasing temperatures as well as drought as the main culprit of the increasing number of wildfires. It is projected that rising temperatures will continue and lead to even more frequent, large, and severe wildfires as well as even longer wildfire seasons (Cleetus & Mulik, 2014). It is crucial to find ways to prevent and reduce costs associated with wildfires in these western states. The effects of wildfires hit areas environmentally and economically. These effects are often felt several years after wildfires occur.
The
…show more content…
city of Colorado Springs lies 63 miles south of Denver in the colorful state of Colorado. The area of Colorado Springs has been impacted by two major wildfires in the last two years. On June 23, 2012, the massive Waldo Canyon fire northwest of Colorado Springs started and lasted for 18 days (City of Colorado Springs, 2013). Almost a year later, on June 11, 2013, the Black Forest fire north of Colorado Springs started and lasted for 10 days (El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, 2014). The recent wildfires in the Colorado Springs area have had major effects on the local environment and economy. The environmental and economic effects of both wildfires are still felt today. The Waldo Canyon Fire Approximately three miles west of Colorado Springs in the Pike National Forest, the Waldo Canyon fire of 2012 was the most destructive wildfire in Colorado history burning 18, 247 acres, killing two people, destroying 347 homes and damaging many more (City of Colorado Springs, 2013).
In addition to property damages and loss of life, there were other damages caused from this wildfire. These other damages consisted of wildlife, plant life, soil degradation and watershed damage. Economic damages from this wildfire were substantial to the local and state economy. Some costs incurred by these economic damages were in the form of firefighting costs, insurance claims, home displacement costs and business closures during the duration of the …show more content…
fire. The cost associated with fighting the Waldo Canyon fire was very expensive. The city of Colorado Springs reports the expenditures submitted for reimbursement from the firefighting efforts totaled $2,712,510 not including the regular salaries of workers (2013). There were many other organizations and agencies involved assisting the city of Colorado Springs with the fire. Some of these included nearby fire departments, local military personnel and other federal and state agencies. The total estimated cost of operational activities is reported at $16, 686, 000 (InciWeb, 2012). Many assets were used, including aircraft suppression techniques to fight the raging fire. Home displacement costs to evacuees were endured during the fire. Many organizations, local charities and faith groups took some of the burden, however there were costs to shelter and feed these people. The long duration of this fire added to the costs as evacuees were not allowed to return to their homes until the wildfire was properly contained. A total of 28,770 residents were evacuated covering 11,308 homes and buildings (City of Colorado Springs, 2013). Many local businesses were evacuated as well contributing to total market loss due to the fire. Again, the fire duration added to these losses. Another huge economic impact was the amount of insurance claims from damaged and destroyed homes caused by the wildfire. Insurance claims of the destroyed and damaged homes from this wildfire totaled $453.7 million (Hemingway, 2013). In addition to the 347 destroyed home, there were claims for damages on many more. Smoke damage was a common claim by many homeowners that still had homes not directly affected by the wildfire but in the vicinity of the affected area. The Black Forest Fire Approximately 14 miles north of Colorado Springs, the Black Forest fire of 2013 burned a total of 14,280 acres, 2 fatalities and destroyed 489 homes, a commercial cell phone tower and 196 other small building structures such as detached garages and out buildings (El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, 2014). As with the Waldo Canyon fire the year prior, there were also damages to wildlife, plant life and soil. Several of the same type of economic damages as the Waldo Canyon fire were felt. Reminiscent of the Waldo Canyon fire, these economic damages were also in the form of firefighting costs, insurance claims, home displacement costs and some business closures. As with the Waldo Canyon fire, many other agencies and organizations were involved in the response to this wildfire.
The response agencies and organizations included state and federal agencies as well as nearby fire and police departments. Many of the same assets were utilized in the fighting of this fire including aircraft to fight this fire. It is reported that the Black Forest firefighting costs at $14.8 million and had a total market value loss of just over $116 million (2104). The Black Forest fire added to the economic effects from the previous year’s wildfire yet costing the local economy additional hardships. Wages for first responders and costs for increased manpower are just a few more factors involved to capture some of the costs associated with fighting the
fire. Also with the Black Forest fire, home displacement costs were a factor. Mandatory evacuations occurred in an area of 94,000 acres covering 13,000 homes and 38,000 people (2104). Cost to shelter and feed evacuees occurred but not to the extent of the previous wildfire of 2013. Local charities and faith groups helped again with this wildfire providing shelter and food for evacuees. The Black Forest evacuation area did not have as many businesses as the Waldo Canyon evacuation areas, but still sustained some business loss to add to the costs of the fire. As expected, insurance claims became an economic factor from this wildfire as well. Claims were filed of the 489 homes destroyed and the many more structures damaged. Insurance claims from the Black Forest fire totaled $292.8 million (Hemingway, 2013). In addition to claims of smoke damage, many small outbuildings and detached garages suffered damage or were destroyed driving the costs of Colorado wildfire claims even higher. Although the Black Forest fire was not as expensive as the Waldo Canyon fire in insurance claims, the addition of these claims make for a cost of almost a billion dollars between both wildfires in Colorado Springs.
Malibu and Yosemite share similar ecosystem, which encourages wildfires and periodic firestorms. In his book Ecology of Fear, Mike Davis argues that Malibu should burn because wildfires are a part of its history. To illustrate his point, he relates numerous historical events from the first settlement of the region to modern days. Despite the high frequency of wildfires in Malibu, humans have continued to settle there in droves. Those settlers have fought the fires, which has done nothing but augment their intensity. Unlike Malibu, with its populated areas that have been damaged by wildfires, Yosemite benefits greatly from wildfires. Yosemite’s ecosystem has evolved with wildfires; indeed, without wildfires, Yosemite would lose its uniqueness. Also, Yosemite is not as heavily populated as Malibu, so fires in Yosemite would not affect humans to the same degree that they do in Malibu.
The United States Department of agriculture Forest Service investigation report on the thirty mile fire.
Wildfires started as an annual and seasonal occurrence in the south western region of California since the early 1930’s in part because of the hot dry summers and the hot dry turbulent Santa Ana winds that blow in from the desert during the fall months. Now it has become a yearlong event (Mckay, 2010). These conditions greatly contribute to the “fire season” throughout this area. This set of circumstances in conjunction with downed power lines and humans that ignited fires took place in October of 2007. This led to a series of fires that burned more than 500,000 acres, destroyed 1,500 homes, killed 9, injured 85, and forced the successful evacuation of around 500,000 people out of harm’s way.
Policies regarding the handling of wildland fires continue to change and evolve as new information is learned each fire season. Attitudes have changed between complete wildland fire suppression to no suppression at all. We now seem to have reached a balance between the two schools of thought and fall somewhere in the middle.
The fire, which began on October 8, 1871, spread so quickly it was unmanageable. One of the reasons the fire became so irrepressible is that the firefighters were already exhausted from having fought a fire the day before. The firemen underestimated the potential of this fire when they first responded to it. As a result of the fire the previous day, the firefighters’ equipment, including the fire hose, was not in the best condition. Furthermore, the hose that was available was in short supply (Murphy 30).
The most pressing issue facing Detroit, in regard to fire, is the steady amount of burning vacant or delipidated buildings, and second to that is the high rate of home fires. For the purposes of this project, the capabilities of
As people of the twenty-first century, we are all too familiar with the frequent occurrence of wildfires in our nation’s forests. Each year millions of acres of woodlands are destroyed in brutal scorches. It has been estimated that 190 million acres of rangelands in the United States are highly susceptible to catastrophic fires (www.doi.gov/initiatives/forest.html.). About a third of these high-risk forests are located in California (www.sfgate.com). These uncontrollable blazes not only consume our beautiful forests but also the wildlife, our homes and often the lives of those who fight the wildfires. The frequency of these devastating fires has been increasing over the years. In fact, in the years 2000 and 2002, it has been reported that the United States has faced its worst two years in fifty years for mass destruction fires (www.doi.gov/initiatives/forest.html.). The increased natural fuels buildup coupled with droughts have been a prevailing factor in contributing to our wildfires and unhealthy forests (www.blm.gov/nhp/news/releases/pages/2004/pr040303_forests.html). Due to the severity of these wildfires, several regulations and guidelines have been implemented to save our forests. In fact, the President himself has devised a plan in order to restore our forests and prevent further destruction of our woodlands.
It is so sad to see the horror of forest fires and how they corrupt our beautiful land. So much damage comes out of what started so small. At least 603 square miles of land were burned in the early stages of the Arizona fire only a couple of years ago (BBC 2). In a Colorado fire 2.3 million acres had been burned (BBC 3). That land could have been saved if the use of prescribed burns had been in the area.
Forest fires kill many animals and usually destroy a large amount of land. Prescribed burns seem like they would be the best idea, but are they? Their claim to fame is to clear out land in order to decrease the burning space for when an actual forest fire occurs. Yet this may seem like a brilliant idea, but one must look at the negative aspects of controlled burnings. People might have a change of heart when they realize the damages and effects of such an interesting act. Keep in mind that not only is your health involved but even such things as the inconvenience of dealing with a smoky town. It is important to understand that prescribed burns cause severe health problems especially to firefighters; these are concerning carbon monoxide poisoning, visibility issues and health risks that will affect the future.
Perhaps the most infamous American example of a coal mine fire is Centralia, a town in the anthracite region of eastern Pennsylvania. Centralia was like any other coal town until one fateful day in 1962, when a heap of burning trash in a dump that doubled as a mine stripping pit quickly spread to other parts of the mine. After a few months of bureaucratic haggling, the local government finally agreed to drill to suffocate the fire, but it had spread faster than had been anticipated and could not easily be contained. In the next few years, subsequent efforts to quell the fire proved futile while it expanded beyond the confines of the coal mine to other areas underneath people’s residences in the town of Centralia.
Fire at any level can be devastating, yet the effects that wildfires have on every worldwide country really has left its mark on the land. As written by world renowned wild fire spokesperson Smokey the Bear, “Every year, wildfires sweeps through parts of the United States setting wilderness and homes ablaze. On average these raging infernos destroy about four to five million acres of land a year. But in 2012, wildfire burned more than 9.3 million acres, an area about the size of Massachusetts and Connecticut combined” (U.S. Wildfires). Destroying homes, crops, towns and of course forests. Yet the effects of these fires can be seen from a negative perspective as well as some positive. Plus there are natural causes as well as manmade that makes these destructive fires erupt and become almost unstoppable in seconds.
Natural Fires are generally uncontrollable blazes, and can be fueled by the weather, wind, and dry underbrush. In addition they can burn acres upon acres of land at a time. Wild land fires clear 4 million to 5 million acres per year, in the U.S. alone. They can move up to speeds of 14 miles per hour, which would imply the destruction, that they can produce. They can consume everything, such as trees, brush, homes, and sometimes humans (“Wildfires”, n.d.). The grizzly bear is one animal that is affected at the result of a fire, both positively and negativel...
...ons have the ability to hurt the economy fatally. Victorian bushfires take a total of $4,369,000,000 out of the government’s money.3 With the expenses of property damage, loss of livestock, death of citizens, forest destruction, recovery, carbon release and infrastructure damage.
Obliterating everything in its path, a bushfire is a natural hazard, which can be defined as wild fires in scrublands and or bushlands, especially one that spreads rapidly and is hard to contain. They can be catastrophic, causing severe damage to properties, the environment and even deaths. And as a result there is an ever-increasing need to prepare for the potential impacts of bushfires.
The Forest fire is occurring very frequently nowadays, reasons for it are a heavy increase in global warming and an increase in temperature.