Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Indentured servitude in colonial america
Indentured servitude in colonial america
Indentured servitude vs slavery in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Indentured servitude in colonial america
Imagine a bustling home, where a flourishing family lives. An inviting scent carries guests to the kitchen, where a woman is cooking. There are children playing and running around, and grandparents sitting by the fire. That is the American house, the heart of colonial families. What do they do in their daily life, and how did they start? Elizabeth Rolfe, a young woman in her twenties, had just finished her service as an indentured servant, a laborious seven years of slavery to an unknown family. Nonetheless, she has made it to Georgia, and now she has freedom and liberty. Her newfound buoyant attitude has attracted many suitors. Men outnumbered women in America, and therefore most women were guaranteed a marriage proposal by their mid twenties. She was no exception, and chose to marry someone who she judged to be a good and honest man who lives on a small farm on the rural area outside of Savannah. Houses in colonial America are all similarly run and oriented. John White, the man that Elizabeth had married, became the head …show more content…
of the household. He is now the family’s disciplinary figure and breadwinner. In particularly poor families, the father was also the religious leader. On his role as a father, John says “This family’s riding on me… I have to take care of all of the money and food”. He takes another sip of tea and looks at his wife, who looks up from cooking corn on an open fire. Cooking can be tough, and it is not the only job a woman has in colonial America. Elizabeth has many jobs including farming, cleaning, and doing laundry. She also lovingly takes care of the children. The White household currently has 7 children, and the four young girls follow their mother’s footsteps to help tend to the cooking food. The boys, James, William, and Edward, chase each other with buckets of water from the well as they water some crops outside on the farm. The atmosphere of the house was always welcoming due to Elizabeth and John’s affable nature.
Though despite all of that, the ghost of death finds even the happiest families. John’s brother, Elijah, had died, and his wife contracted malaria and was on her deathbed. Their children mourned their death, and the air became dark and doleful around them. They were now orphans, and found a new opportunity for life with the White family. But families always keep growing. The typical family in America consists of grandparents, parents, children, and adopted orphans. To conclude, colonial families are a fascinating aspect of life in America. No matter where you lived, the families were large, working, and very similar. Everyone in the house has a specific job, and they work every day. Death is as large of an attribute to the family life as work, and it affects how the family is run. The home is truly important in America, and home is where the heart
is.
The lngles family from Little House on the Prairie, a popular television series, demonstrates the working class. Mr. Ingles works while Mrs. Ingles takes care of the household duties. The family displays a genuin e happiness. They have no modern utilities, but they have each other. They have a strong love within their family, and worldly materials serve little importance to them. A typical family today displays tremendous difference s compared to the Ingles family. Jealously and competitiveness play a major part in showing these varia...
While the Protestant Revolution raged in Europe, Catholics and other radicals were fleeing to the New World to find religious freedom and to escape prosecution. Because of this, the northern colonies became more family and religiously orientated as the families of the pilgrims settled there. From the Ship’s List of Emigrants Bound for New England we see that six families on board made up sixty nine of the ships passengers (B). Not only did families tend to move to New England, but whole congregations made the journey to find a place where they could set up “a city upon a hill”, and become an example to all who follow to live by as John Winthrop put it to his Puritan followers (A). Contrastingly, the Chesapeake colonies only had profit in their mind, which pushed them to become agriculturally advanced. Since Virginia, one of the Chesapeake colonies, was first settled with the intention of becoming an economic power house, it was mainly inhabited by working-class, single men. The average age of a man leaving for the Americas was only twenty two and a half years old according to the Ship’s List of Emigrants bound for Virginia (C). The harsh conditions of the colony did not appeal to those who wished to settle with a family. Added on to that was the fact that the average lifespan in the Chesapeake colonies was a full ten years or more shorter than that in other more desirable living quarters to the north.
Lasch-Quinn, Elisabeth. "Family." Encyclopedia of American Cultural and Intellectual History. Ed. Mary Kupiec Cayton and Peter W. Williams. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2001. Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.
During the 1700's, people in the American colonies lived in very distinctive societies. While some colonists led hard lives, others were healthy and prosperous. The two groups who showed these differences were the colonists of the New England and Chesapeake Bay areas. The differentiating characteristics among the Chesapeake and New England colonies developed due to economy, religion, and motives for colonial expansion. The colonists of the New England area possessed a very happy and healthy life. This high way of living was due in part to better farming, a healthier environment, and a high rate of production because of more factories. The colonists of the Chesapeake Bay region, on the other hand, led harder lives compared to that of the colonists of New England. The Chesapeake Bay had an unhealthy environment, bad eating diets, and intolerable labor.
Edmund S. Morgan's The Puritan Family displays a multifaceted view of the various aspects of Puritan life. In this book, we, the audience, see into the Puritans' lives and are thereby forced to reflect upon our own. The Puritan beliefs and practices were complicated and rather "snobbish," as seen in The Puritan Family.
Instead of having scattered villages like the Virginia colony, the people of the Massachusetts Bay Colony organized communities that were small and built close together. These centers were built so that villagers were able to complete a wide range of duties such as cultivating land or fetching lumber from forests (Divine, 94). This system was especially efficient for finishing these important tasks and allowing time for other agendas that were important to the colonists. The setup of the town was not just efficient. Families were able to live close together which helped create a sense of community among the people. Taverns and meetinghouses were commonly built in town, giving the ...
Surviving anywhere south of New England was a major challenge for the colonists in the seventeenth century in part due to the overwhelming majority of men in society combined with a high death rate. Just to continue a family was a daunting challenge, and in many cases, this venture proved unsuccessful. Population consistency was sustained only through the immigration of people from England until the later portion of the seventeenth century when the population began to rise on its own. The New England colonies, however, were polar opposites in every sense. Be...
The New England colonists were very unified and were a “knit together” community (Doc A). Faith was the most important thing to the settlers. The colonists came to the New World to be free of religious persecution. Since church was very important to New England colonies, their towns were often very close together so travel to church would not be a far distance. This contrasted greatly with the Chesapeake region, which was very spread out. New England was family oriented and they lived in a patriarchal society (Doc B). Strict duties were placed on the husbands and wives of each family (A well ordered family). This differed with the Chesapeake region. The population of the people brought over to the Chesapeake region was predominantly young males, with a ratio of six males to every one female (Doc C and G). Also, no children under the age of 14 was brought over to Virginia. This highlights how less family oriented the Chesapeake region was compared to New England. New England and Chesapeake Bay developed differently because they each had different social standards.
In the essay, “The Godly Family of Colonial Massachusetts”, authors Steven Mintz and Susan Kellogg explains how the Puritan family affected from longer social, constitutional, and economic community which the boundaries were flexible and comprehensive the family assigned to public association. Mintz and Kellogg concludes that the Puritans never thought of the family as an individual unit and separating from a surrounding community for them it was like a fundamental part of a larger political and social world. The Puritan families were fissionable in structure because of an amount of the population been spent part of their lives and other families homes, serving as apprentices, contracted laborers, or assistant also marriages rise out as one of their main events in their lives.
...t;Notes on Plymouth Colony," William and Mary Quarterly 22 (1965): 264-86. A "localist" focusing on the popular culture of New England, he revised the "high culture" focus of previous historians, preferring to study court records of family documents, land distribution records, tax rolls, estate inventories, and museum artifacts. Demos pursues Pilgrims' perceptions, ideals, and hopes by studying non-narrative data such as vital statistics, property deeds, and settlement records. Demos "has combined this data with his remarkable ability to listen to post and sieves and to evoke the living conditions in thosw crowded Puritan households." He applied Erik Erikson's "life cycles" model to his study of the Puritan family, which he found to display "essential continuity." Demos' most original contribution is his discussion of Puritan child-rearing practices and the traumatic character formation commencing during the second year and culminating in a "tight cluster of anxieties about aggression" (134-37). This study still requires "explication of the political, religious, and socio-economic provincial connections."
...ads. While in Virginia the governor’s mansion brought balls, banquets, and dancing to the communities. But overall, colonial America was considered to be pretty mundane, monotonous, and dull. The main events were marriages, funerals, and church-goings. While daily events consisted of farming and trading. But as the seventeenth century progressed, visiting and socializing, dinner parties, dances, and hunts in the south became more and more popular and brought more happiness to society. In addition wealth was gained through tobacco sales and trade
Women have been oppressed since the beginning of time, they have always been thought of as lesser to men in our culture, and they still are. Although some people may disagree women are still put at a lower bar to men. They have a lower chance of getting certain jobs, making more money and being put into places of higher power. People of color have also been oppressed for a very long time. Back in colonial times this sexism and racism was even stronger and more powerful. Women couldn’t get any jobs that had to do with government and had very little power over what they could or couldn’t do. African americans were almost all slaves and if they weren’t they still had little to no rights, it was extremely difficult for them to find jobs. This
...show us that the choices for women in marriage were both limited and limiting in their scope and consequences. As can be seen, it came down to a choice between honoring the private will of the self, versus, honoring the traditions and requirements of society as a whole. Women were subject to the conditions set down by the man of the house and because of the social inequality of women as a gender class; few fought the rope that tied them down to house, hearth, and husband, despite these dysfunctions. They simply resigned themselves to not having a choice.
Comparing its structure and function as it was in 1960 with what it had become in 1990 can highlight the dramatic changes in the American family. Until 1960 most Americans shared a common set of beliefs about family life; family should consist of a husband and wife living together with their children. The father should be the head of the family, earn the family's income, and give his name to his wife and children. The mother's main tasks were to support and enable her husband's goals, guide her children's development, look after the home, and set a moral tone for the family. Marriage was an enduring obligation for better or worse and this was due much to a conscious effort to maintain strong ties with children. The husband and wife jointly coped with stresses. As parents, they had an overriding responsibility for the well being of their children during the early years-until their children entered school, they were almost solely responsible. Even later, it was the parents who had the primary duty of guiding their children's education and discipline. Of course, even in 1960, families recognized the difficulty of converting these ideals into reality. Still, they devoted immense effort to approximating them in practice. As it turned out, the mother, who worked only minimally--was the parent most frequently successful in spending the most time with her children. Consequently, youngsters were almost always around a parental figure -- they were well-disciplined and often very close with the maternal parent who cooked for them, played with them, and saw them off to and home from school each day.
In her essay, Woman in the Nineteenth Century, Margaret Fuller discusses the state of marriage in America during the 1800‘s. She is a victim of her own knowledge, and is literally considered ugly because of her wisdom. She feels that if certain stereotypes can be broken down, women can have the respect of men intellectually, physically, and emotionally. She explains why some of the inequalities exist in marriages around her. Fuller feels that once women are accepted as equals, men and women will be able achieve a true love not yet known to the people of the world.