Wasn’t Slavery Abolished in 1865
The average division one football program generates $31,924,154 in revenue for their school (Gaines 2).” College, once a place to go to enlighten your mind, has since turned into a lucrative business. When you walk into a college bookstore, half the items are football related. The items the football players make popular many players cannot afford. These athletes, who train 30 hours a week on average, receive no compensation. The belief is that college athletes 4 years later walk away with a college degree from a prestigious school at no charge. The truth of the matter is that only 55.1% of players actually graduate (Martinez 3).” Do the athletes even care about the education they are receiving? Cardale Jones
…show more content…
tweeted out “Why should we have to go to class if we came here for FOOTBALL, we ain’t come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS” on October 5, 2012. With so much money created by college football players, the pure enjoyment of the sport is not enough compensation for all their hard work. The first College football game was played on November 8, 1969. It was New Jersey tigers vs. Rutgers queen’s men (Rutgers 1).” With only 100 spectators accounted for, we can see college football has come a long way. Now we have a lot more than a field to play on, rather $72-$420 million dollar stadiums for every school (Gaines 2).” The teams have gone from a 100 spectators all the way to 42.06 million in spring of 2018 (Rutgers 1).” Youngsters idolize many of these players. From having to sit alone at lunch to being the center of attention, players have the capability of sparking change in the lives of the youth. This scenario played out when FSU wide receiver Travis Rudolph sat next to a young man named Bo (Chan 1).” Bo, a child who is suffering from autism never has to worry about sitting alone because he now has a plethora of friends. These players have such a big social media presence whatever they take part in; there is always a camera filming. The NCCA is making enormous amounts of money each year attracting millions of new visitors year after year, even competing with the NFL for viewers and profits. The topic of paying college athletes has been around since the birth of the infamous “Fab Five” in 1991. Critics of paying college football stars will argue that there sole purpose is to attain an education, not on how well they perform in the football games. The college would not be able to make as much income off the games. In today’s society, the ability to attend a university is a privilege not everyone has. The term, “student-athlete” starts with student, which is what is supposed to come first (Chan 1).” NCAA’s rulebook perceives the players as amateurs, not professionals. If they were to receive compensation, football would become a job that is the polar to why they are there. “The best argument against paying players is the fact that it diminishes the value of an education” (Lemmons 3).” Too many questions would surface which would instigate controversy that colleges do not have time to deal with. One could assert that any individual should be able to profit from their NIL (name, image and likeness). The NIL is the first right stripped from these student-athletes who play with a chip on their shoulder and give their 110% every workout, practice and game. The sport they play for the love of the game is now leaving them with a financial burden. Braxton Miller, a young man on the OSU football team, performed a spin move so fast it took the world by storm. The spin happened during the rematch of OSU vs Virginia State scientists claimed him to have, “a peak angular velocity of 676 degrees per second” (Smith 26).” ESPN frequently played it, and multiple clips on YouTube averaged 500,000 views. Big corporate leaders who made money off it all the way down to the small filmmakers took his superhuman-like spin away from him. Ed O’ Bannon and numerous scholarship athletes in a related issue sued the NCAA and its business partner for the production of videogames that had them as the main characters (Marshall 2).” They claimed that the production of these videogames stripped them of their NIL. Once the court was pressured into coming up with a conclusion. The court stated when an athletic recruit exchanges his labor and NIL rights when agreeing for a scholarship. This point alone sounds very corrupt, because it is undeniably breaking the 13th amendment right. The 13 amendment states, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States”. This amendment is ironically the same amendment the NCAA backs up their argument with, referring to the case of Vanskike vs Peters. One can deduce that the NCAA is comparing their athletes to prisoners. Rarely are people aware of how much a college scholarship is worth.
On average, a scholarship is worth $25,000 a year, and over the course of four years, it totals $100,000 (Marshall 1).” On paper, this sounds like a lot of money, but what people do not take into account is the athletics part that consists of injuries, which can lead to your scholarship revocation. In all honesty, the statistics show that many athletes only last 2 years at their original college, either for not making the cut, politics, or injuries. For the players, the field is a dog-eat-dog world; if you do not put in all your time into the athlete part of student-athlete, someone else will gladly take your place. Many of the critics think being an athlete is not a full time job. Yet, if you take a step into a collegiate football player’s life, you see the facts are that you wake up before classes to attend a mandatory gym session, after mandatory conditioning session, and an hour later you have class till about 4p.m., then the long anticipated practice, after that you have mandatory study hall. Where is the time to work a part time job? There is none! College athletes put 40 hours on average into athletics per week (Smith 21).” The point here is a scholarship does not equate to money in the bank. It leaves them dead broke. Now, on the road the team can give a whopping $7 for meal money to a player, anything more than that is an NCAA violation. So how much money is exploited off these gifted athletes? Well for one, the highest paid public employees in 39 different states are the coaches themselves (Gaines 2).” College coaches earn an average of $1.64 million per year, the highest paid being Nick Saban, with an annual salary of $10.9 million (Tracy, Marc, and Rohan).” What happened to the critics saying athletes need to be doing it for the love of the game? These athletes are dead broke, putting their blood, sweat, and tears into their sport, some not being able to enjoy a movie, food, and going
out. Meanwhile, their coaches get to live an extravagant and luxurious life style. The college coaches are not the only exploiters, the main one is the NCAA. A 501 3-C is a business term that stands for a nonprofit organization. “Nonprofit” that has to be a joke! They earned $1.1 billion in the year 2017 overseeing 460,000 athletes and 14,000 teams (Marshall 1).” The big people never like giving to the little people even if the little ones are doing all the hard work. The main reason I believe college athletes deserve compensation for their hard work is due to multitude of injuries that many receive throughout their time in the NCAA. Concussions are the highest percentage injury for football players which can leave them with brain damage that can affect them long term. The NCAA has no insurance plan for these athletes unless playing in a championship game which then and only then will they dip their hand into their precious billions of dollars to help a little. Also in hindsight, the solution seems simple if the argument is that they pay for play based on a scholarship then just let the players receive compensation because of their NIL. In the past, a multitude of times large conglomerates have exploited athletes. The most notorious is the “Fab Five” who increased Michigan State’s profits from $1.5 million to $10 million in only a year (Mama 2).” Shortly after the birth of the “Fab Five”, Nike produced a shoe named after them, which made tons of money, none of which went to the players. They had to walk through the halls of their school, seeing students wear jerseys, shoes, and t-shirts with their own names on it. Can you blame athletes for accepting booster money when they do not see any part of the millions they generate? The proposed plan above would stop all the lawsuits, put the media at ease, and stop so many heated discussions. In conclusion, with so much money created by college football players, the pure enjoyment of the sport is not enough compensation for all their hard work. I have written the critics counter-arguments, and there is no basis in reality on which they stand. Their arguments are stools with two legs instead of three, weak and unstable, rarely having any supportive facts to support the claim. In turn, that is why I highly support the idea that college football players deserve compensation on their NIL. It is a given right that no one should be able to take from another person.
If there’s one thing we dread in the summer more than the heat, it’s the afflicting sentiment that surrounds oneself when one is inhibited from experiencing the thrills of football for six long and gruesome months. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is a part of many Americans’ Saturdays, but to fewer does it mean their lives. Recently coming under debate, many sporting fans and college athletes believe that players should be paid more than just tuition, room, board, and books. Two articles on this issue that bring up valid points worth discussing are Paul Marx’ “Athlete’s New Day” and Warren Hartenstine’s “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” From these articles I have found on the basis of logical,
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
The athletes at these institutions bring in tons of money into their school every year and deserve compensation. These Universities are exploiting these athletes by not giving them back what they make for their school. The numbers say it all when it comes to the scamming of the athletes by their own schools. In 2004, over 40 schools brought in more than $10 million, with 10 of them bringing in over $30 million. Several athletes around the nation are worth more than $1 million to their school(Brown). Both of these statistics are proof that while these athletes are essential to their schools, they are still kept out of the revenue. Even though these Universities won’t pay their players, the schools still have no problem giving their coaches some money. In 40 U.S. states the head coach of the basketball or football program is the highest paid public official(Edelman). Over the past 20 years, there has been a major increase in the popularity of college athletes. From 1989 to 2004 there was a 27% increase in ticket revenue(Brown)...
For most American’s especially African Americans, the abolition of slavery in 1865 was a significant point in history, but for African Americans, although slavery was abolished it gave root for a new form of slavery that showed to be equally as terrorizing for blacks. In the novel Slavery by Another Name, by Douglas Blackmon he examines the reconstruction era, which provided a form of coerced labor in a convict leasing system, where many African Americans were convicted on triumphed up charges for decades.
Financial aspects and profitability of college athletic programs is one of the most important arguments involved in this controversy. A group of people expresses that college athletic programs are over emphasized. The point they show on the first hand, is that athletic programs are too expensive for community colleges and small universities. Besides, statistics prove that financial aspects of college athletic programs are extremely questionable. It is true that maintenance, and facility costs for athletic programs are significantly high in comparison to academic programs. Therefore, Denhart, Villwock, and Vedder argue that athletic programs drag money away from important academics programs and degrade their quality. According to them, median expenditures per athlete in Football Bowl Subdivision were $65,800 in 2006. And it has shown a 15.6 percent median expenditure increase fro...
Paul Dietzel, former head coach of LSU, once said, “You can learn more character on the two-yard line than anywhere else in life.” Ever since the beginning, not only children but also college athletes have been playing sports for the love of the game and have used it as a way to grow character, teamwork, and leadership. Although when playing for a University an athletes job is to bring in profit for the school, this is not why these young men and women have continued with these sports they love. It is usually these students passion, a way for them to express themselves like others have art and music. The question has been up whether these college athletes should be paid for their loyalty and income for the University but by paying these students more than their given scholarship, it would defeat the purpose and environment of a college sport versus a professional sport, cause recruiting disputes, and affect the colleges benefits from these school athletics.
Tiffany Patterson argues “College football players are already receiving scholarships to pay for their tuition and it is unfair to other students who are juggling between jobs and school.”(Patterson) Although college football players work hard at playing football, it is unfair to other students who are not receiving scholarships and having football players paid will be even more unfair. According to Lauren Horne, the lead author of Bleacherreport, says “College football players cost universities and colleges lots of money and paying them will put the universities in even more financial debt. Universities and colleges spend about $42 million on football players who, except for an elite hundred, will never play in the NFL.”(Horne) Colleges are already have finance issues and if they pay all the players, their trouble will get worse. Rick Burton, the professor of sports management at Syracuse University explains “Student athletes who go to college are already receiving a fair amount of pay by receiving an education”(Burton) The athletes are being compensated for their time on the football field by the professors giving them an
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...
Since the early 1900’s when college football first became a NCAA sport, it has had a history of paying its athletes as well as improper benefits. In around 1910, Walter camp was put under fire for having a fund for players of over $100,000. Camp was one of the early pioneers in football that brought the game where it is today. In the 1950’s, scandals hit the college of William and Mary for hiding its players poor grades to allow them to be eligible all season. (Branch 83) This is important because the University of William and Mary was contending with powerhouse football programs that season for a national title. This here all shows that even 50-100 years ago collegiate athletics had already been dealing with improper benefits for players.
Emil Zatopek once said “An athlete cannot run with money in his pockets. He must run with hope in his heart and dreams in his head.” This quote applies to every college athlete. The quote means that an athlete may not be getting paid in college, but if they put in the hard work and dedication they can make it to the big leagues. College football is the second most watched sport in America. And the athletes playing the game do not even get paid a penny to play the game. In the sports world. this has been talked about for an extremely long time. College athletes put their body on the line for injury. They put their grades in on the line because of the hours they put on the court, or field (Keolanui). They also sell their apparel at the game and at stores and they get no money at all (Keolanui).
As highlighted by John Oliver in Last Week Tonight, the University of North Carolina was found giving their football players filler courses in order to boost their GPA to the point of athletic eligibility. One of the popular courses is Swahili, a language that nobody will ever need to use unless you plan on going to the Swaziland. Along with your devotion to the highest quality education provided to you for free, college athletes may have to endure verbal abuse from their coaches. The same coaches that USA Today found have an “average annual salary for head coaches at major colleges (not including four schools that moved up to the Football Bowl Subdivision this season) is $1.64 million…” Not only do they receive a salary from their respective school but also money from camps they hold, products they endorse and the apparel company they may represent. While college athletes are giving everything to their university’s athletic program, they receive no compensation. They struggle to keep food on the table some months, their parents back home are impoverished and they are not allowed to make any money off of the name they made for themselves? These are young adults living a professional athletics lifestyle on top of a full time student lifestyle being exploited by the NCAA, an organization meant to protect and support the well-being of their athletes. The practices implemented by the NCAA are
For decades there has been a debate on student athletes and their drive to succeed in the classroom. From the very beginning of organized college level athletics, the goal to want to succeed in athletics has forced students to put academics to the back burner. In spite of the goal to want to succeed over a hundred years of attempts to check limits of intercollegiate athletic programs on colleges' academic standards still seems to struggle to this day. This brings to surface one of the most asked questions in sports, “What effect does college sports have on academics and economics?” Herbert D. Simons, Derek Van Rheenen, and Martin V. Covington, authors of “Academic Motivation and the Student Athlete” researched the topic on whether athletics and academics benefit each other. Bryan Flynn, the author of “College Sports vs. Academics” poses the question “Should institutions of higher learning continue to involve themselves in athletic programs that often turn out to be virtual arms races for recruiting talented players who bring big money and prestige, but put academics to the back burner?” Although both authors agree that sports have an impact on an athlete’s academics, the focus of their argument differs.