This paragraph is talking about athletes getting paid in college. This topic is discussing a major role to athletes, because if athletes get paid they will be able to pay for their books. When athletes get paid their parents will not have to worry about their child books and rent. Most parents still pay for their child’s college fees, books, rent, and food. College athletes should be paid so that they will not have to depend on their parents. This will help college athletes get ready for the real world, and leading them to teach other athletes.
In this paper, it should convince college coaches that their athletes should be paid. Coaches say all the time that “ our players work very hard.” An athlete put hard work in the locker, and on the field
…show more content…
to get time on the field to be recognized by college recruits. Athletes train when they have football practice and probably train when the have nothing else to do to prepare them for challenges. If athletes get paid, some athletes will have a kind heart and donate some of their money to charities to help out people in need. Some people will love to see college athletes donating some of their own money to charities, because of how they feel or how they like to be nice to others. Athletes know that the lord will give them something bigger in return for what they have done. Athletes that get paid money will not have to stress or skip classes because they can not pay for their own things. If athletes do not get hard headed or big headed they will notice that they are doing very good for their selves. Athletes will just want to keep working hard to keep getting paid and save up so they can go ahead and pay for their upcoming bills. Paying athletes would make athletes want to stay in school, and not drop out. When athletes start staying in school they will not only want the money but get their team to the championship. When athletes stay in school NFL coaches and general managers would look at them and be like that is a very good kid. The more athletes stay in school, the more time they can study and prepare for upcoming test they will have to take. Keeping athletes in school means higher grades or test scores, that will come from them studying and stay at school keeping their heads in their books and not wasting their talent doing nothing. Athletes staying in school lets them learn more about the source or class they are taking to graduate and do something with their life. If college athletes do not get paid, some athletes will just think they are just playing to have fun or just out there just to be out there. If athletes do not get paid they will not be able to pay for their own housing and living space. This will make athletes have to depend on mom and dad to pay for everything they need at their dorm or apartment. That’s why athletes should get paid, because their parents do not want to come out of pocket dealing with their child fees and things for college. Athletes can not get jobs because they will be to tired to work after they get done working out or practicing long hours to get the team prepared to win championships. If athletes do not see money coming in they will begin trying to quit school or they might quit because they can not afford the housing or the fees for their books and living space. This will cause them to quit school, find jobs, and look back and say “ I had the talents I just could not pay off my debts, fees, housing. Most athletes do not like quitting school because they figure they could take their talents to the pro’s. this will make them think twice but when the fees and rent start coming in this will stress them out, putting pressure on them to pay for everything. The counterargument for this is why college athletes should not be paid in college. They should be paid because this will make them feel like pros in college. Most athletes just go to college just for the sports and not the schoolwork thinking they can have the easy way out. They should not be paid because that will cause increase in price to watch them play when you are the biggest fan of that college. It would ruin the tradition of the college and the spirit people had for the college. Paying athletes would have them going out and buying other things with their money than the reason what they needed the money for. This will lead to people trying to figure out what they are doing with their money instead on putting it on the college books, fees, and housing to keep them to going to school. If you would think about it there are a lot of colleges with a lot of athletes. How would they be able to divide the money fairly to all the athletes to get them to have the same amount in their pocket as other athletes? Many people are saying,” they already are getting a scholarship to come to their college so why pay them.” Most NCAA athletes do not need to be paid because they compete in sports and play in divisions that earn little or no money for their schools. This is very wrong to athletes because of how they get the team to championships winning rings and awards for the team, if it actually been 6 or 7 years to get a bowl standing around the school. College athletes bring fans to their game to watch them play, but paying athletes will make the fans feel like they are watching a lot of young adults getting paid like pros are. Fans support athletes every chance they get, but how many will support if athletes just paid just to watch little action. Another reason why athletes should not get paid, you have some people that never gets in the game but gets paid to just sit on the sideline watching the friends and opponents play but not you. Athletes that felt like they were the best in high school but did not get to go to play college football would make them mad, because they would feel like it suppose to be them out there and not the person they went to high school with. Should college athletes get paid--- yes they should their parents do not want to deal with their rent, fees, and housing.
College athletes should be paid because the more they get paid means the more athletes that will be drafted to the NFL or what ever sport college athletes are playing. College athletes should get paid for what they are doing because schools get their money because of athletes playing in sports. If athletes get paid, they will be able to pay for their own clothes, shoes, jewelry, haircuts, car, and car insurance every month. Athletes will then know what their parents were going through when they had to pay for everything you wanted. This will teach athletes what to be prepared for in the future or when the kids go off to college playing sports and things. Another reason why they should get paid, because athletes have been waiting on that moment when they get to college to see what they can do and the hard work their high school coaches had trained them for. Then, athletes should be paid because college’s gets fans from the way they that there college. Another reason why they should be paid is because coaches make money for coaching the team and they had to do the same thing their athletes had to do in
college. When paying athletes it would give them time to spend their own cash and an opportunity to start managing money. This is getting them ready for when they start getting the big money rolling through their accounts. College athletes spend an average 43.3 hours per week putting in the hard work and training very hard to get their to win championships back to back. Winning championships means more athletes will make the game more competitive to make their team win. Paying coaches a lot of money per week is putting a lot of money in their pocket when the athletes need it for when the really need the money the most. The things that college football players have to do is a lot to handle, because they have to remember plays and keep his academics high so that he will be eligible to play. Last but not least, when playing college football players win championships they should get paid for their hard work they put in through the season to make to that level.
In “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid,” a response to the previous argument that also appeared in the Baltimore Sun, former Penn State football player Warren Hartenstine argues that “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Like Marx, Hartenstine is writing to a similar audience, but argues why student-athletes shouldn’t be paid above scholarships like professional athletes are.
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Posnanski, Joe. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, 8th ed. Pages 584-590. 2013.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
Eitzen, D. Stanley. "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Sports and Athletes. Ed. James D. Torr.
Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
College sports have become more popular throughout the past few years and the NCAA is doing an immense amount of money. This increase in money has caused colleges to become involved in this global debate over whether college athletes should be paid or not. Many athletes believe they should be paid for all their hard work, time, and dedication to the organization. Other people like, Kristi Dosh, believe that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because there are too many questions that haven’t been answered for them to join the opposing side. A lot of questions come up with this debate, like which athletes are going to get paid? Kristi Dosh is an author and an ESPN sports business reporter. Dosh wrote the essay, “The Problems with Paying College Athletes”, on June 9, 2011. This essay was published in Forbes which is a business magazine about sports and money. Kristi Dosh makes a somewhat convincing argument by asking a lot of questions to get her audience to realize how difficult this change is, however; she doesn’t do a very good job giving any citations or statistics to back up her statements. Ultimately, I think Dosh is convincing to her audience, but the weaknesses outweigh the strengths.
Money and sports Collegiate athletes attend college to master their craft before going professional, and should not be paid. This also does not factor in other things such as injury and other issues that could arise. Colleges paying students to perform is not merited and would only cause more problems. Scholarships are important because they allow a student who could not usually attend college for free, with the only requirement being that they play on the football team. That is why student athletes should not get paid, because they are already receiving a free education.