Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief history of sports
Brief history of sports
Historical development of sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Definition of indentured servant, you work for accommodations and food.” (Arian Foster, Get schooled Netflix documentary). This definition could also describe a college athlete. College athletes have been making the NCAA millions of dollars for decades. All the athletes want is money to help them get by in school, but because we are not paying them they leave for the pros as soon as they can. So now these kids are not getting the education they should, but instead are just trying to make money. College athletes deserve to be paid, if the NCAA is making money from their play. The NCAA is a trap for athletes to make colleges money, colleges don’t care enough for the individual athletes, and these athletes do so much for their colleges. These are just a few of many examples of how the NCAA is deceiving and using these athletes.
The NCAA is an old institution. The NCAA is 108 years old, as it was founded in 1906. The NCAA is a “non-profit” organization that was founded to regulate and protect athletes and their schools. “To help and protect athletes was the main goal for the creation of the NCAA” (Marc Edelman (P)).The NCAA has changed their priorities. The NCAA is changing their views from caring about the athletes to caring about making money. If the NCAA is really only caring about making money and paying colleges and coaches then they aren’t doing their job. “While coaches today get paid millions in 1906 when the NCCA was being created that was not the case” (Marc Edelman (P)). When the NCAA was created it wasn’t paying or intending to pay coaches. Over time, the NCAA’s views on paying coaches has been changed from not paying them to overpaying them. The coaches and the Colleges are making money, but not ...
... middle of paper ...
...need to be as large. So college athletes right now are indentured servants, but hopefully in the future they won’t be, they will be employees.
Works Cited
Bowen, Fred. "Should College Athletes Get Paid?" Washington Post. The Washington Post, 09 Apr. 2014. Web. 26 May 2014.
"For College Scholarship Athletes, Injury Can Spell Financial Disaster." The Daily Caller. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 May 2014.
Edelman, Marc. "21 Reasons Why Student-Athletes Are Employees." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 30 Jan. 2014. Web. 26 May 2014.
"Schooled: The Price of College Sports." Netflix. Netflix.com, n.d. Web. 26 May 2014.
Yost, Mark. Varsity Green: A behind the Scenes Look at Culture and Corruption in College Athletics. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2010. Print
Michael Wilbon. "College Athletes Deserve to Be paid." ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, n.d. Web. 26 May 2014
They do not face problems of debt and tuition to the extent that the normal college student faces. Student-athletes are fairly compensated through publicity and financial benefits, and the NCAA should continue to refrain from paying them. The varying size and interest levels of universities makes it almost impossible to fairly pay all athletes. In order to avoid problems like those exhibited by Northwestern’s football team, who recently tried to unionize, all athletes would need to be paid equally. The excitement brought on by college sports is immense, and problems created due to paying athletes would only hurt the tradition and charisma that college athletics offer. In conclusion, College athletes are students and amateurs, not employees. “Remember student comes first in student-athlete”
Van Rheenen, Derek. "Exploitation in College Sports: Race, Revenue, and Educational Reward." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 48.5 (2013): 550-71. Print.
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated, 20 Jan. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/paul_daugherty/01/20/no.pay/
Cooper, Kenneth J. "Should College Athletes be Paid to Play?" Diverse Issues in Higher Education 28.10 (2011): 12-3. ProQuest. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
Posnanski, Joe. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, 8th ed. Pages 584-590. 2013.
Salvador, Damon. “Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?” 20 April 2013.Web. 18 May 2014.
“Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?” US News. U.S. News and World Report, Apr. 2013. Web. 05
Mitchel, Horace and Marc Eldelman. Should College Student- Athletes be Paid? 6 January 2014. 6 April 2014 .
Many sports people say that if the NCAA pays the athletes to play, it will encourage them to stay in school longer. The money that the athletes will receive at the next level will be bigger than any amount the NCAA can afford to pay them. Athletes argue that the NCAA and ESPN are making billions of dollars off of them to air their games; why can’t they get compensation for it. This argument is valid, but no matter what amount, free education is far more valuable than any financial amount. You’re talking about giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. It’s simple: bigger, faster, stronger athletes will generate more money. College Universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. College athletes should get paid based on the university’s revenue, apparel sales, and lack of spending money.
Pennington, Bill. "Expectations Lose to Reality of Sports Scholarships." nytimes.com. New York Times, 10 Mar. 2008. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
The Washington, Post. "Why college athletes should be paid to play." Washington Post, The June 0004: EBSCO MegaFILE. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
Herbet D. Simans, Derek Van Rheenen, and Martin V. Covington focuses their argument on academic motivation of student athletes and what drives them to want to succeed in the classroom as well as on the court or field. Although Flynn also focuses on academic motivation of student athletes, he also discusses how colleges tend to spend more money on sports related necessities for the students instead of towards their education. Flynn’s argument displays how colleges are basically a business...