Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Collectivism vs individualism easy
Individualism vs collectivism societies
Similarities and differences between cross cultural and cultural psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Collectivism vs individualism easy
Repressive adaptive style is fixated on an individual’s desire to conceal and mask the symptoms of mental illness such as depression and heightened anxiety that are disgraceful and frowned upon by society, and to maintain a self-image of a mentally or physically “robust” individual. This stigma of mental disorders impedes on an individual’s cry for help by facilitating repressive sanctions, primarily in communities exhibiting collectivist attributes. According to the article “Collectivism and the Meaning of Suffering” by Zachary Rothschild, collectivists have a tendency to see themselves as inescapably entrenched in a system of social relations and an integral part of the greater entity. Collectivists orient their beliefs, standards, and values based on social morality, which is the belief that morality is governed …show more content…
Findings have shown that where beliefs of social morality are strong, abnormal physiological symptoms tend to be construed in a repressive fashion. When a society worries greatly about preserving societal obedience and unity, conforming to authoritative measure, and adhering to sacred religious doctrine, personal disabilities is an assumption that disruption has taken place and that it must be properly rectified to assure composure. Additionally, collectivists are bound by a tight culture, where individuals feel that they are enclosed within a circle that shares a common respect for systematized tradition and religious social norm. They understand their responsibilities and roles within the social hierarchy, which are indisputable and acknowledged by the community. Moreover, collectivists adhere to and comply with authoritative figures and are prepared to give up their own interests for the good of their group. They are not receptive to the changes or irregularities that challenge the social norms and attempt to curtail any actions that could impede on and jeopardize the prescribed social
Culture is a collection of religion, traditions, and beliefs that are passed down from generation to generation. Culture is created and maintained through the repetition of stories and behavior. It is never definite because it is continuously being modified to match current trends, however, historical principles are still relevant. With respect to mental illness, culture is crucial to how people choose to deal with society and the methods used to diagnose and cope with mental illnesses. In Watters’
Collectivism is any philosophic, political, religious, economic, or social outlook that emphasizes the interdependence of every human. Collectivism is a basic cultural element that exists as the reverse of individualism in human nature (in the same way high context culture exists as the reverse of low cont...
society, and are not accepted in many aspects of the general public, and with these
A culture’s tendency to be individualistic or collectivistic can be found at the root of
Mental health patients were considered innately inferior and treated as the weaker portion of the human race due to the prevailing dominant theory of Social Darwinism in the 1800s. They were put in mental asylums, where conditions had deteriorated substantially from earlier in the century. (Floyd) The public’s interest about the unsatisfactory care of the mentally ill, championed by Dorothea Dix, led to some reforms, such as higher medical standards, more oversight into asylum practices, and more research into mental health. (Floyd) Nevertheless, the status of the mentally ill did not elevate much higher, and by the 1890s the repeated failure of asylum therapy convinced most that insanity and mental illness was incorrigible. Finding no alternatives, however, patients continued to be sent to asylums to attempt to cure them as much as to isolate them from the rest of society. (Roberts) Unfortunately, people also began to fear the proliferation of the mentally ill. When sterilization became considered, unrealistic, more, cheaper asylums were built as a means of segregated them and preventing an increase in their numbers. (Roberts)
In recent years, he has developed an interest in how people cope with the stresses of warfare, a focus that has led to several books (Like Lions They Fought, Mau Mau, The End of the Asante Empire, Warriors of the Rising Sun, Death or Glory, and Warrior Women and Hidden Heroism). This interest continues, as does his concern with the impact of cultural relativism on cultural theory, best seen in Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony, published in 1992. Throughout his career, he has maintained an interest in the community adaptation of persons with mild mental retardation. Over the past 40 years Edgerton has also been a teacher and mentor in the Neuropsychiatric Institute at UCLA where he has received a lot of support for his research.
Being a psychology major, I know the effects and consequences that mental health can carry for individuals. However, after taking many psychological classes at Berkeley, I found that the psychological definition on mental illness barely represent or fulfill to what people experience in the United states. In other words, I found that psychologists in America tended to emphasize on the biology of people, without focusing on their upbringing or their society. In addition, I also notice that instead of removing stigmas, many psychology and psychological research aggravated the problem by diagnosing people on the accounts of race, gender or status. That said, I found that structural competence pushed me to take the political aspect of mental illness. For example, I envision myself, not only advocating for the rights of people with mental illness, but also stopping with stigmas and discrimination. In fact, especially in the US, stigmas on the mentally ill can be dangerous because the more people that suffer from stigmatization, the less likely they will find a home, a job or achieve personal good health. In particular, stigmas can be worrisome to people suffering from mental health if the criminal justice gets involve because people gets incarcerated into prisons for having a mental illness instead of getting the treatment they need. Thus, I envision myself making political statements about people managing
In every society, there is conformity and nonconformity, although we may not notice it. Conformity is when someone is doing the same thing as others because they do not want to be the only one doing differently. Example, if there was a whole class raising their hands would you want to be the only one with your hand down, no so you would raise it with the rest of the class to not look like you don't know anything. This is called social pressures it when a large group is doing something and you're the only one not then you want to be doing whatever that large group is doing.
I never even thought about this word “individualism” before I came to America. Instead of collective, normal is the way I considered as my culture, and for American culture, I would say they are selfish and unkindly sometimes back then. However, after my 2-year study here and all the research I’ve been read for this paper, now I say that neither individualism nor collectivism is purely bad or good.
In the article Issues and Controversies says, "Throughout most of human history, people with mental illness were ostracized, isolated, and persecuted." ( Infobase,1) This belief system can give causation of mental illness in different cultures and such influences in a community will always be in a negative manner. Various societies struggle with the notion of mental health. The standards of every culture believe to be considered normal, natural, or healthy. These views lead to disagreements about the causes, diagnosis, and the treatment of the disorders. Many people with mental problems are discriminated against because of their mental disorder. Mental illness and stigma refers to the view of the person with mental illness as having undesirable traits. Stigma leads to negative behavior, stereotyping, and discriminatory behavior towards the person with mental health issues. This stigma causes the affected person to experience denial or shame of their condition. Perceived stigma can result in the patient being scared to seek help. Stigma can be divided into two perspectives, public and self stigma. Upadhyay says, "Public stigma occurs when the general
The cultural paralysis was seen in the fact that “there is no free play back and forth among the members of the social group. Stimulation and response are exceedingly one-sided.” Both the rich and poor suffer: the poor in that they have little involvement in the courses taken in their lives; the rich in that their “culture becomes sterile” (DE, 84).
As a cultural relativist, one would believe that morality is culturally bound. This is a subjective idea that believes “different societies have different moral codes” (Rachels,
This article puts into perspective how those who are mentally ill lose their quality of life by becoming stigmatized by those surrounding them personally and in a broader sense. Their jobs, housing, health care, and affiliation with others is negatively impacted because of the stigma placed upon them because of their mental illness. This article continues to describe the stigmas that are placed upon the mentally ill by our Western culture. The authors state that mentally ill persons deal with being feared and excluded because of their mental state. They also deal with being viewed as irresponsible because of their mental diagnosis. Finally, they are seen as immature and childlike, thus requiring constant care to be put into place for them. Not only do these authors focus on public stigmas, but they also focus on how these cultural stigmas cause those who are mentally ill to begin to internally stigmatize themselves. This causes self-esteem issues; thus, this causes the individual to feel less worthy and less likely to succeed in his or her future in all areas of
Even in a small society the individual beliefs of members may differ, but are subjected to the moral beliefs of the majority. With moral relativism individuals are too likely to disobey with the laws or morals of the society they belong too
collectivism is the degree “to which a society is based on satisfying the needs of the individual versus satisfying needs of the group” (Hofstede, 2001). U.S. scores higher (91%) than India (48%) in terms of individualism. Individualism (I) stands for a society where everyone is expected to look after themselves and their immediate family only. It also signifies that success is based on an individual’s achievement and people deliver their best performance when they work alone. In contrast, collectivism (We) stands for a society where people prefer to live in cohesive groups that take care of them in exchange of loyalty. They value the welfare of their group, sacrifice for them over their own individual needs and are actively attached to them throughout their life. Thus, the contradiction in the perception of this dimension significantly impacts work relationships between U.S. and