Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stroop effect conclusion
The stroop effect research report
Stroop effect conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stroop effect conclusion
Cognitive psychology is based on how mental processes such as perception, attention, language, memory and thinking occurs in the brain .Attention refers to the way we actively process specific information in our environment. When referring to selective attention one of the most widely looked at and replicated studies is the stroop effect , which was carried out by and also named after John Ridley Stroop(1935). The stroop effect by definition is a demonstration of interference in the reaction time of a task. In his experiment, Stroop administered two different sheets to the seventy participants.On the first sheet, names of colors appeared in black ink. While on the second sheet, names of colors appeared in a different ink than the color named. …show more content…
One of the main theories that has come out of the research regarding the stroop effect is the speed of processing theory. According to this theory, people can read words much faster than they can name colors. Because there is said to be a lag in the brain's ability to recognize color. To help support this theory a study known as the advanced stroop effect was carried out by Torin Franz and Evan Frick.Torin Franz and Evan Frick sought out to find if there is a point where the spelling of the word in a Stroop task is so jumbled that it does not interfere with our ability to report the color of the word. After conducting their experiment they found that the more jumbled the words the quicker the reaction times were in naming the color .This is because the words were so jumbled we were no longer automatically reading them. With this research psychologist were able to gain a better understanding of why the participant’s in stroops first experiment were able to recognize the words as fast as they did even when they were a different color, because the words were being automatically …show more content…
Ridley Stroop in 1935 which is why it was named after him. What Stroop observed was that it takes longer to name the color of the ink when the word is different from the ink than when the ink and word are the same.Stroop carried out multiple experiments, recording the time taken and errors made in each one.In each expierment stroop tested different things based on the same effect his experiments variaed all the way from words to shapes.How ever the dependent variable always stayed the same which was the response time of the participants. Stroop found that participants were slower to perform a task and made more errors when they were presented with an interference.Because the conflicting ink would affect the way the brain processed the information which goes into explaining current day topics such as automatic processing and is currently being used to treat/test children to see if they have a type of
His experiment consisted on observing the different reaction times on a number of identifying processes, based on the interference demonstrated on the Stroop experiment (Windes 1968). Unlike the color identification in the Stroop experiment, this experiment resembles more to the experiment conducted in class, as it matched short words with number. The experiment yield results that expressed a faster reaction times to the words. This experiment showed that the effect observed in Stroop does not belong only to color identification but other features, like small words and
Buddha, Confucius, and other lesser known Hebrew scholars philosophized on the mind in an expansive sense.
It seems as new minds enter the field so does new ways of thinking, as with anything the science evolves depending on the perspective of the person who views it. Similar to the main character in “The Noticer”. The main character helps people by expanding their perspective. Cognitive psychology is similar in the way it studies the various intricacies of a person’s behaviors and way of thinking. Cognitive psychology is relative because when one considers a person’s perception it usually has a basis in a person’s experience. In other words perception is a series of layers and cognitive psychology has a basis in the various layers of processing information that one acquires and stores.
Cognitive psychology is concerned with the internal processes involved in making sense of the environment and deciding what action may be appropriate. These processes include attention, perception, learning and reasoning, (Eysenck and Keane, 2010).There are a number of approaches which can be used within this field, however for the purposes of the essay only two will be compared; cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology. The aims of cognitive neuroscientists are often similar to those of cognitive psychologists; they are both interested in the brain and cognition, (Medin and Ross, 1996). Nevertheless, it could be argued that there are also some fundamental differences between the two approaches, especially in the research methods employed. This assignment will explain and evaluate the models in comparison to one another.
Cognitive psychology is the study of the brains internal processes that guide behaviour; to study cognition, psychologists examine case studies of patients with damaged brains that can infer areas, and functions involved in particular processes. Patient studies have provided insights into the processes that take place within our minds, and have enabled psychologists to create models, which can be tested and fractionated. Cognitive neuropsychology has developed from cognitive psychology to become a discipline in its own right; it investigates the function and structures of the brain involved in cognitive processes and should not be confused with cognitive neuroscience, which is primarily concerned with neural structures and their functions.
Craik and Tulving did a series of experiments on the depth of processing model. They had participants use a series of processing methods to encode words at different levels; shallow, moderate, and deep. The subjects were shown a series of words and ask questions about the words that would provide a "yes" or "no" response. At the shallow level they were asked questions about whether or not the word was written in capital letters. At the moderate level of processing, the subject was asked questions as to whether or not two words rhymed. Finally, the subjects were asked about words in sentences and whether or not they fit. This was the deep level of processing. After participants had completed the task they were then given a surprise recognition test with the words that they were just asked questions on (target words) and then words that they have never seen before (distraction words). The results of the experiment showed that people remembered the words better that were at deeper level of processing (Craik and Tulving 1975).
Whilst evaluating the cognitive approach to psychology there are many strengths such as that the cognitive approach takes an understanding of the influence from mental processes on one’s behaviour, focusing on an individual’s thinking patterns and their perception. This approach also relates to many known functions and operations that the human body performs such as memory and problem solving.
Treisman, A. (1964). Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 3(6): 449-459.
According to numerous references in the field of Psychology, a cognitive psychologist is an individual that studies topics such as thinking, problem-solving, learning, attention, memory, forgetting, and language acquisition, among several others. Cognitive psychology is the branch of psychology that studies mental processes, and its core focus is on how people acquire, process, and store information. While great research has been done within the field of psychology, there are individuals such as B.F. Skinner who criticize its strides, purposes, and research methods.
People went through different kinds of attention like divide attention or selective attention. Let see on the context of reading, when people try to say the colour of the words instead of reading the words it would be difficult. As adults, people have practiced reading for so long that it is hard to read a word that they look at. The situation shows that people encounter with selective attention. Stroop effect is a phenomenon when the semantic meaning of the word matches with the colour it will be easier to say the colour of the word in which it is attributed to the interference from the word in the chore of responding to the colour (Zurron, Goicoa & Diaz, 2013).
This report demonstrates that factors of the Stroop effect test and the stimulus of colour congruence, incongruence and non-colour words that give consequence to the participants’ reaction times. The Stroop Test was created in 1935 by JR Stroop, since its inception more than 700 articles related to the subject have been published, becoming an instrument widely used, both in the clinical and research fields, to evaluate the inhibitory capacity and the attentional control of the interferences. The test presents a set of words either to be categorised as congruent, incongruent or non- colour.
Insight is a term that is derived from Middle English expressions such as “inner sight, mental vision, [and] wisdom” (“Insight,” n.d.). According to the Oxford Dictionaries, the technical term for insight is “the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a person or thing” (“Insight,” n.d.). Insight is gravely important in regards to problem solving and creative thinking. It is indeed a concept that holds much value in the psychological community and is said to be “essential” to creative thinking (Qinglin, Jiang, & Guikang, 2004). The essence of the phrase ‘insight problem solving’ can be further explained as when a “problem solver fails to see how to solve a problem and then – ‘aha!’ – there is a sudden realization how to solve it” (Jones, 2003). When referring to insight, it is not that the problem solver received a miraculous idea from out of nowhere; the problem solver simply had a brief moment where he or she was completely unaware as to how a solution can be found. Therefore, “the problem solver was competent enough to accomplish the task to begin with” and they simply needed a moment to come up with a solution (Jones, 2003). Moreover, that is where the research and questions in regards to insight play a vital role in the cognitive field of psychology. The question that insight brings to light is, what happens in the mental process of an individual who becomes “stuck” and suddenly they gain insight and are able to create a solution (Jones, 2003)? As one can see, insight is a concept that is significant in cognitive psychology.
“Dr. Gold told me once or twice during our sessions that I should try to avoid the hospital at all costs, owing to the stigma I might suffer” (Styron, 1989). This comment along with misguided medication dosages are one of the issues regarding the treatment William Styron received for depression. Throughout Styron’s novel, he describes his disorder of depression slowly creeping onto him as time passes. He is reluctant to seek professional help until an incident in Paris makes him realize he struggles with a disorder in his mind that could lead to a fatal outcome.
(Mary McMahon, 2003) Two main theories have been created and used to explain the results of the Stroop experiment. These theories are known as the Speed of Processing theory and the Selective Attention theory. In the Speed of Processing theory, it is thought that the brain needs to use more attention to identify a color than to identify a word, causing a delay as the brain processes the color. However, according to the Selective Attention theory, the brain needs to give more attention to the color, rather than the word, causing a discord between the reaction times of the word and the reaction times of the color.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375.