Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cochlear implant essay
Essays on the cochlear implant
A doctors perspective of cochlear implants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cochlear implant essay
Consequently, as you can see both hearing aids and cochlear implants have very superlative technology, that they have countless positive effects on many individual lives around the country and are an important contribution for parents to understand these advancements and help their child the best they can. “Hearing loss can impact your work and social life,” says Larocque. “Restoring one’s hearing gives people their life back,” (Donohue 1). A primary benefit of wearing hearing aids or cochlear implants is enhanced directional perception. An individual that hears better in one ear may find it difficult to locate where sounds are coming from because perception is off due to the fact that you are receiving sound of a decreased volume in one …show more content…
side. These advanced technologies can help to balance out this issue. Another advantage is that by utilizing these technologies one can have an improved conversational comprehension. They help to amplify the starts, stops, and high-pitched sounds that are common in speech. Many people with hearing losses have a difficulty distinguishing sounds like “th” or “s” from one another. “If hearing aids don’t offer enough help, implants might be worth a look. They convert sound to digital info that is sent to an electrode surgically placed in the inner ear, which communicates the sound to the brain via the auditory nerve,”(Laliberte 3). Hearing devices are very costly but insurance helps to cover these costs. “Medicare and most private insurance plans routinely cover cochlear implants,” (Herzog 1). A disadvantage of hearing aids and other hearing devices in the past is that they were not very attractive. Now, they come in a variety of styles and configurations including models that are completely in the ear canal or behind the ear. Being able to hear better outweighs any of the disadvantages. The topic of the new hearing advancements, has not only focused on the positive impacts on individuals receiving these new technologies, but also focuses on disadvantages of getting either hearing aids or cochlear implants. One disadvantage is that many people that could benefit from these hearing devices do not take advantage of them. “But the rate of hearing aid use is phenomenally low—about 15 percent of those who need one." That's partly because Medicare and most insurance plans don't cover hearing aids,” (Can You Hear Me 3). Hearing aids can be very costly with some costing as much as $8,000 per pair. Many would argue you cannot put a price on how much an individual’s quality of life can improve. Another disadvantage is that the potential discomfort from choosing the wrong style or type. This can usually be an easy fix by visiting an audiologist to obtain a more suitable model. An additional disadvantage is the inconvenience and maintenance issues. Proper and routine maintenance is required to keep the hearing aids or cochlear implants functioning well. The final disadvantage is the stigma of wearing hearing aids. Now that these devices are small and many times not even seen, this is not a major issue any longer. “Cost, stigma, inconvenience. Those and other barriers may explain why millions of Americans with impaired hearing don't use hearing aids,” (Can you Hear Me Now 2). “Cochlear implants bypass damaged portions of the ear and directly stimulate the auditory nerve. Signals generated by the implant are sent by way of the auditory nerve to the brain. Hearing through a cochlear implant is different from normal hearing and takes time to learn. Some cochlear implants are extremely successful,” Martin says. "But people with implants are still deaf,” (Walker 1). These devices do not cure hearing loss, but aid the individual to hear better by utilizing the technologies that are available. These devices are made to make a difference in individual’s lives which is why people from all around the world should have these advancements. By analyzing the positives and negatives of all of these advancements, one can easily see that the positive outweigh the negatives because it not only changes individual lives in a way that is unimaginable, but it helps the hard of hearing community to have more options and better technology to those who want a better life. Having these certain advancement can make a major impact on individual’s lives such as self- confidence, more job opportunities, and even speech perception. As an author named Ken Donohue, once stated in his article, “Hearing loss can impact your work and social life,” says Larocque. “Restoring one’s hearing gives people their life back,” (Donohue 1). This specifically means these advances can help an individual with minor or major hearing loss and will have a numerous impact on ones’ life and social life. With that being said, having a hearing aid, or cochlear implant can give someone the opportunity to live life a little more normal. There are many people around the world who care about the individuals from hearing and deaf community. Even in an article, the author Kingston presents, “Certainly we're going to make people live longer, healthier, happier lives," says MIT scientist and engineer Robert Langer, renowned for developing "smart" implantable microchips that target drugs directly at tumors,”( Kingston 2). Most scientist or engineers try to make living life a little better for individuals, they care for certain people who are having difficulty dealing with having issues such as a hearing loss, disease or other obstacles. With that being said, these technologies of hearing aids or cochlear implants, developed by professionals will always help the society and make those people live a lot better. One of those lives is a girl named Veronika in an article written by Micheal Chorost which he stated, “Veronika said she loved having a fully implanted device: “You don’t have to think about it. That’s the most important thing. When it was turned on, it was one of the most beautiful experiences I ever had. Nothing touching my ear. That natural feeling of hearing—it’s just beautiful,” (Chorost 2). This came from a girl who was having an enormous difficulty hearing in her surroundings and once she put on a hearing aid, it change her life. One of the main reasons why people should have these advantages is to have a better impact on their life and cause life experience. From all around the world a hearing community is a type of group where individuals have a hearing impairment and most of those individuals are proud to be wearing the latest advancement and support these new technologies.
For this research paper I interviewed a mom of 2 children, who is 49 years old named Kathy Hilling. Hilling was born with a severe hearing loss in both ears. Hilling even said, “ I was born with a nerve deafness on one side of my ear, so I’ve worn hearing aids my whole life up until last year when I got a cochlear implant on one side,” (Hilling). This means that she a major part of the hearing community, and she is just like all the other individuals who are having the same problem. She loved having hearing aids, and loves having the newest technology of cochlear implants even more. Her mother didn’t know until the age of 2 that she had a hearing loss, when someone noticed she was always distracted in preschool. Hilling even stated, “I wish my mom would’ve known sooner about my hearing, so I could have had early invention and had help with speech and had had the different kinds of developments. I could have received hearing aids at an earlier age,” (Hilling). This has made a major impact on Hilling’s live because if she would’ve gotten hearing aids at an earlier age, her speech would be significantly better. Having hearing aids at a young age, helps a child in school with their education and with speech. Speech therapy is essential to start even prior to a baby even speaking. She even expressed, “If I had the choose to choose between hearing aids and cochlear implants I would go for the cochlear implants because it has changed my life in so many ways,”(Hilling). She has had hearing aids her whole life, but once the hearing aids stopped working, there was nothing she could do except to get a cochlear implant. This has changed her life in so many ways, such as hearing sounds she could not hear prior such cars on the street or the noises of fans
going back and forth. The majority of hearing communities feel this way about hearing aids and cochlear implants, and that you can make your life easier especially social situations and everyday tasks much simpler. Even though most of the hearing community wants to benefit themselves with these new advancements, however many in the deaf community love to be deaf and embrace their true self with their way of life such as sign language. In a recent article written by an author named Lou Ann Walker she discussed a school named St. Joseph’s which is for the deaf and explained that there is only 4,201 schools left that are fighting for the deaf culture. The deaf culture is embracing being deaf and using such things as ASL which stands for American Sign Language. The author even stated, “Robert Pinsky wrote a poem in collaboration with deaf students depicting ASL as "a language, full of grace ... visible, invisible, dark, and clear." It is a language of extraordinary intimacy,” (Walker 3). American Sign Language is a language in the United States, but is slowly decreasing since so many deaf people started to receive cochlear implants. Even a girl stated, “All this reminded me of the remark by a child of a family friend, shortly after he had received a cochlear implant: "Daddy, I think I like deaf better,” (Myers 3). Most of the deaf community feels if you’re deaf and God made you this way, therefore you should be that way. The community feels they need to fight for a survival for ASL or deaf people in general. With all these new advancements that can benefit those individuals who are struggling it has changed the way the community is as Walker stated, “I think the deaf community as we know it is going to be different. Many say the cochlear implant is the demise of deaf culture," (Walker 1). Being deaf is something special to the deaf community and they are hoping for a future for the coming generations.
She longs to understand her hearing friends and have the ability to hear. Chris’s family, however, has opted to give their deaf son, Peter, a cochlear implant against the wishes of Mari’s Deaf parents and the Deaf community around them who feels it as wrong. Peter and Mari wish to give their deaf son the same opportunities as their hearing child because they are twins. Peter’s family investigates more about the cochlear implant by visiting families who have opted to give their children cochlear implants, but also go and visit the Maryland School for the Deaf to explore all sides of the argument. All the while, Heather’s father is against the idea, Heather’s mother is supportive at first but then changes her mind. Heather’s grandparents fight for Heather’s choice to receive the implant, but ultimately, the family decided that it wasn’t the right
I chose to do my paper on the movie Sweet Nothing in My Ear. The movie was about a child who was born hearing and ended up going deaf, so his parents had to deliberate on whether or not they wanted to get him a cochlear implant. The wife Laura (played by Marlee Matlin) is deaf and her husband Dan is hearing. The movie is centered around Laura and Dan’s struggle to decide if a cochlear implant is what’s best for their son Adam. It doesn’t help Laura make the decision when her parents are both deaf, and her father is basically prejudiced against the hearing culture.
What I found most interesting about Jarashow’s presentation were the two opposing views: Deaf culture versus medical professionals. Within the Deaf culture, they want to preserve their language and identity. The Deaf community wants to flourish and grow and do not view being deaf as a disability or being wrong. Jarashow stated that the medical field labels Deaf people as having a handicap or being disabled because they cannot hear. Those who are Deaf feel as though medical professionals are trying to eliminate them and relate it to eugenics. It is perceived that those in that field are trying to fix those who are Deaf and eliminate them by making them conform to a hearing world. Those within the Deaf community seem to be unhappy with devices such
Cochlear implants are amazing feats of biomedical engineering, and have helped many people regain the ability to hear. While there are some ethical dilemmas that go along with them, there is no denying just how amazing these implants really are. By understanding how the ear works, what causes it to stop working, and using science and engineering to fix that problem, there is now a way to give someone a sense they might have never been able to experience. It can be costly, but it could drastically change someone’s life. Some people may say for worse, but there will always be someone else to say it was for better. Overall, cochlear implants are an incredible invention and will continue to grow and only get better with technology.
Lane, Harlan (1992). “Cochlear Implants are Wrong for Young Deaf Children.” Viewpoints on Deafness. Ed. Mervin D. Garretson. National Association of the Deaf, Silver Spring, MD. 89-92.
Many individuals have different views surrounding cochlear implants. Most of the Deaf community tends to be against them whereas most of the hearing community tends to be in favor of them. It is important to understand not only want a cochlear implant is, but how the different communities view the implants so that we can gain a better understanding of Deaf culture.
In support of Gallaudet University's, “Deaf President Now!” protest, Rev. Jesse L. Jackson once said “The problem is not that the deaf do not hear. The problem is that the hearing world does not listen.” (Lee) This concept been seen throughout Deaf history; Today it is especially noticeable now that technology has been developed to restore some hearing to many who are deaf. However these seemingly miraculous devices such as hearing aids and cochlear implants (CI) are a gilding for the real problem. CI’s in particular are thought to be a miracle cure for deafness, this misconception causes a great friction between Deaf and hearing culture. Deaf people should not be expected to get CI’s to “cure” their deafness for three primary reasons: CI’s promise more than they can deliver, they are an affront to Deaf culture, and ASL is a more effective way to insure development.
A hearing loss can present many obstacles in one's life. I have faced many issues throughout my life, many of which affected me deeply. When I first realized that I was hearing-impaired, I didn't know what it meant. As I grew older, I came to understand why I was different from everyone. It was hard to like myself or feel good about myself because I was often teased. However, I started to change my attitude and see that wearing hearing aids was no different than people wearing glasses to see.
The deaf community does not see their hearing impairment as a disability but as a culture which includes a history of discrimination, racial prejudice, and segregation. According to an online transcript,“Through Deaf Eyes” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007) there are thirty-five million Americans that are hard of hearing. Out of the thirty-five million an estimated 300,000 people are completely deaf. There are ninety percent of deaf people who have hearing parents (Halpern, C., 1996). Also, most deaf parents have hearing children. With this being the exemplification, deaf people communicate on a more intimate and significant level with hearing people all their lives. “Deaf people can be found in every ethnic group, every region, and every economic class” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007). The deaf culture and hard of hearing have plenty of arguments and divisions with living in a hearing world without sound however, that absence will be a starting point of an identity within their culture as well as the hearing culture (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007).
From a deafness-as-defect mindset, many well-meaning hearing doctors, audiologists, and teachers work passionately to make deaf children speak; to make these children "un-deaf." They try hearing aids, lip-reading, speech coaches, and surgical implants. In the meantime, many deaf children grow out of the crucial language acquisition phase. They become disabled by people who are anxious to make them "normal." Their lack of language, not of hearing, becomes their most severe handicap. While I support any method that works to give a child a richer life, I think a system which focuses on abilities rather than deficiencies is far more valuable. Deaf people have taught me that a lack of hearing need not be disabling. In fact, it shouldn?t be considered a lack at all. As a h...
Today’s society consists of numerous individuals who are diagnosed with disabilities that prevent them from partaking in their everyday tasks. Not everyone gets the chance to live a normal life because they might have a problem or sickness that they have to overcome. Deafness is a disability that enables people to hear. All deafness is not alike; it can range in many different forms. Some people like Gauvin, can be helped with a hearing aid, but some can’t because of their situation and health reasons. In society, hearing individuals consider deafness a disability, while the deaf themselves see it as a cultural significance. In the article “Victims from Birth”, appearing in ifemnists.com, Founding Editor Wendy McElroy, provides the story of
The Deaf Community commonly interprets the prompt nature of early implantation as slowly eradicating their culture and community. The Cochlear Implant usually gets its best results in young patients due to the development of hearing going hand-in-hand with the reintroduction of sound in the subject. This, although scientifically proven, is still very much seen as an affront to the Deaf society due to the widespread forcing of it upon the young, rather than having them develop and make their own decision. While many deaf people have been well on the way to recovery with the implant, many others shed it and embrace the culture proper and continue speaking in ASL. This all depends on the time they were implanted and what kind of parents they have. The debate is very heated on this topic, the hardcore enthusiasts of Deaf Culture continuing to shun it and those who put them onto their children, while those who support it continue to support it and help it advance further forward. The implant in the end, is the most popular choice for those who are candidates that either used to be hearing or are the children of hearing parents, while those who are deaf and prefer to stay that way mostly choose to stay
While the idea of human tracking has its share of benefits, there certainly are numerous pitfalls that also exist. While the ability to identify someone with an ID tag may have practical uses, the security and privacy issues could seem potentially alarming to some. Not only that, a closer look may show that the technology doesn’t necessarily offer very many advantages when considering the costs of nation-wide adoption of the technology. This paper will try to investigate into these issues, whilst attempt to come up with some solutions.
As the complexity and convenience of technology increases, some of the new advancements such as microchip implant for humans and animals can be very controversial. At first, the implants may seem to have benefits, but in the long run they will actually cause more trouble than they are worth. These potential "troublemakers" are about the size of an elongated grain of rice and are injected into the skin under the arm or hand (Feder, Zeller 15). The chip is not powered by a battery and there is nothing that can possibly leak out into the body (Posada-Swafford 8). An early form of this technology was used to monitor salmon and has been used for other wildlife research (Verhovek 5).
First of all, when I was a baby, my Mom noticed that I was not responding when she called my name. Each time Mom took me to the doctor, the doctor said everything was fine. One time the doctor clapped behind my head to test my hearing. I turned to the doctor and the doctor told Mom, “See, he can hear.” When I was 18 months old, Mom asked the doctor, “shouldn’t he be talking by now?” The doctor said,” Boys are slow. My son never talked until he was 2 ½ years old and then he just started talking in sentences.” But, Mom didn’t give up. She took me to an audiologist to have my hearing tested. The audiologist diagnosed me as being deaf. This is where I was truly my own body, being deaf without a cochlear implant. My parents showed they loved and cared about me by not giving up when they thought something was wrong. This is kind of ironic because I was my own body and my parents wanted to change it for the good. Meaning that they want to give me a cochlear implant so I can hear.