Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Workplace transformation strategies
Organizational, transformational and transitional changes for changes in organization
Organizational change is not an easy task
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Workplace transformation strategies
Question one Management often struggles to establish control over dominant and pervasive organizations to insure a coordinated approach to the delivery of goals and objectives. Organizations consist of various simultaneous events, which can be assessed and interpreted in different ways. Cluelessness characterizes some organization. Their goals and objectives lack clarity. As a consequence, they lack a framework to motivate employees, facilitate planning. evaluate, and control performance causing a loss of direction. Management and employees in a clueless organization either do not know. or fail to appreciate, and understand its vision, aims, and objectives. They are ignorant of the vision and mission of the business. Cluelessness makes organization lose …show more content…
Bureaucracy helps establish the structure, particularly in large organizations. Bureaucracy in an organization helps put up rules, definitions, and procedures required to ensure safely and predictability resulting to organizational structure. It determines how tasks are allocated, supervised, and coordinated to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization. The structure determines how people perceive the organization and its environment. Bureaucracy is a structure with tight and rigid policies, constraints, and procedures. Unlike the structural frame, a bureaucracy has stringent controls with a great unwillingness to change adapt. Bureaucracy helps establish the structure in an organization by formalizing its operations. It ensures every unite in the organization has a structure with .clear lines of authority and responsibility for every situation. The decision-making process in a bureaucracy uses a strict control-and -command structure. An adequate structure due to bureaucracy translates an organization into a machine with parts that should be maintained and replaced when they do not perform.
QuoIron
Top-level managers in bureaucratic organizational structures exercise a great deal of control over organizational strategy decisions, which is ideal for business owners with a command and control style. As for the disadvantages, bureaucratic structures can discourage creativity and innovation throughout the organization. No matter how ingenious a business owner is, it is virtually impossible for a single individual to generate the range of strategic ideas possible in a large, interdisciplinary
This leads to one of the major themes of the book, which is that when operating in a bureaucracy, certain people are enabled to put their interests in front of the interests of others, whether it is supporting the interest of their
Once set up, bureaucracy is inherently conservative. The reason the bureaucracy was initiated may not continue to exist as a need in the future. The need or reason may change with a change in the times and the culture needs. A bureaucracy tends to make decisions that protect it and further it’s own existence, possibly apart from the wishes of the populace. It may not consistently reflect what might be optimal in terms of the needs and wants of the people.
...in most countries, as bureaucracy is an extremely efficient and effective system. Australia for instance uses a system of bureaucracy, as it has many different levels of social importance. For example, there are the government officials on the top, who make the laws and do the decision making. There are the representatives who bring the people’s needs to the government and there are people who do all the administrative work for the government (such as the tax department and so on). There are also police officers who do most the physical work to insure that the laws are being carried out.
This essay will discuss the mainstream and critical perspectives of bureaucracy and post-bureaucracy. It will begin by examining the characteristics of bureaucracy and then compare the mainstream and the critical views. Post-bureaucracy will then be discussed using the same structure.
Corning is a decentralized company currently being plagued by both external and internal threats, such as market uncertainty and poor communication and planning systems. The company has just recently started to recover from a large layoff in 1975, which reduced worker job confidence. The Houghton family has a preference for an informal workplace with an ambiguous leadership style that contradicts the formal and strict resource allocation system designed for their international strategy. The current strategy being employed differs with the owner’s philosophy, which is important, since the President must buy into the plan to understand and communicate it effectively. This miscommunication creates goal incongruence, which is exemplified by the confusion of corporate divisions about whether they should be focusing on reducing cost or being an innovator. Also, each officer has been described as having work that overlaps, showing no focus and a lack of efficiency. The fact that each of the over 150 businesses groups have to write up a resource allocation request and business strategy creates the issue of finding time to read each report.
One of the aspects of bureaucracy is that it creates fixed division of labor. The benefit of fixed division of labor is that it allows humans to become specialized at what they do as they can learn from their experiences and gain more in depth knowledge on the topic. When individuals work with similar environmental uncertainties on a constant basis they obtain a better understanding of how to deal with those uncertainties. They often use their experiences to deal with the situation in ways that worked for them previously. In addition when there are assigned jobs, it is easier to hold specific individuals accountable for their tasks. This allows the organization to quickly find who caused a certain problem and fix it. Accountability leads to people being more likely to work in the best interest of the organization, as they know that there could be repercussions for not doing so. People will use the techniques that they have previous experience with and that they know work in order to not make a mistake and be held accountable. And so they will work in a stable and predictable manner. When the people in the organization work in a stable and predictable manner the organization is likely to work in the same way. Accountability also helps in solving problems and quickly getting the ...
...eet customer demands thus flexibility is key. However there are criticism of post-bureaucracy for example if a company decides to subcontract due to insufficient supply of workers, this would decrease the workers production which would mean that the company is not flexible thus not agreeing with a feature of post-bureaucracy as well as there would be a key difference between pay. There are many factors encourage companies to move from bureaucracy to post-bureaucracy. For example technology requires companies to work together because they are innovative, a company can be skilled but there is always something the company cannot develop thus networking and sharing information is important. Bureaucracy could not cope with the pace of change; information technology meant that there was more external control allowing informal relationships and a minimal division of labor.
Weber’s uses his theory of Bureaucracy to point out that it is what society is becoming and how it creates social older in society. This theory is
This means that the goals of the employees, as well as project goals are not well defined. Often the goals are weak and vague in nature. When this happens, it is very difficult to find a common ground for where the team terms as successful. It is just like bowling in the dark. It is possible to hear the ball hitting the pins – but wouldn’t it be nice to know which pins are actually knocked down. Additionally, this brings an atmosphere where employees can’t speak about their profession with authority and certainty. These are signs of managerial
Organizational structure is the way that an organization arranges people and jobs so that work can be performed and goals can be achieved. Good organizational design helps communications, productivity, and innovation. Many organization structures have been created based on organizational strategy, size, technology, and environment. Robbins and Judge (2011, p. 504) listed three common structures: simple, bureaucracy, and matrix. In this post the author will describe the matrix structure, and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.
The lack of success at Omega, Inc. rested in the hands of an incompetent sales staff who were not informed of the company’s mission statement and goals. The staff received limited training on the jobs they were to perform. Omega was faced with the challenge of getting the employees to achieve their sales quotas. According to (Aguinis, 2007), “There are two important prerequisites required before a performance management system is implemented: knowledge of the organization’s mission and strategic goals and knowledge of the job in question.” The benefit of superior knowledge of the organization combined with clear and agreed upon mission and strategic goals of their unit would afford employees the opportunity to make contributions that will have a positive impact on the organization as a whole. In addition, one must possess the knowledge of the job in question to execute the tasks necessary to be done and how they should be done. This knowledge is obtained through a job analysis. Omega failed to implement strategic planning throughout all the franchises. According to Aguinis (2007), “Strategic planning allows an organizati...
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
All in all, it’s definition seems to be similar across the line in the basic sense. Bureaucracy is a system that “makes critical decisions which shape the economic, political, social, and even moral lives of nearly everyone on earth” (Downs, 1964, p. 1). According to Alder & Borys (1996) the negative view of bureaucracy is a form of organization that stifles creativity, fosters dissatisfaction, and demotivates employees whereas the positive view, bureaucracy provides needed guidance and clarifies responsibilities, thereby easing role stress and helping individuals be and feel more effective (p. 61). This system is not carried out by all organizations and entities but by ones that choose to be and usually are the ones that fit the description.
Bureaucracy is an organizational design based on the concept of standardization. “It is characterized by highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization, very formalized rules and regulations, tasks that are grouped into functional departments, centralized authority, narrow spans of control, and decision making that follows the chain of command” (Judge & Robbins, 2007, p.