Clinical Trauma Theory

1203 Words3 Pages

Ever since the 1980s, not only clinical trauma theory has witnessed a dynamic development in different fields, particularly in the literary world, but also influenced literary and cultural theory by putting the emphasis on traumatic events, their unexpected and long-lasting impacts resulting in the transformation of traumatized characters, and ways each character deals with these events. There is also a mutual relationship between trauma fiction and contemporary studies of trauma in medical and scientific discourse as these studies continuously seep into literary discourse, especially after the recognition of PTSD in 1980, resulting in the emergence of literary trauma theory, which is generally defined as an interdisciplinary theoretical body …show more content…

As mentioned before, this impossibility is because of trauma’s resistance to representation and language. So how is it possible to define the relationship between trauma and narrative when there is the possibility of failure in narrating trauma? Whitehead also argues that the focus of such narratives has changed from “what is remembered of the past” to “how and why it is remembered” depending on the period’s dominant politics, ethics, and aesthetics (3). Accordingly, I will investigate whether the selected novels belong to those narratives focusing on “what is remembered of the past” or those focusing on “how and why it is remembered.” Similarly, I will examine whether the selected novels succeed or fail in narrating traumatic experiences and how this is represented through time scheme in …show more content…

For example, Craps argue that literary trauma theory and trauma fiction are Eurocentric and they generally focus on the Holocaust and 9/11 “as the paradigm[s] of individual and communal trauma” at the cost of marginalizing or ignoring other atrocities committed by human beings (46). To compensate for this narrow viewpoint, a new direction is proposed in applying this theory to contexts belonging to the non-western world (Buelens, Durrant and Eaglestone 12). Accordingly, Craps attacks literary trauma studies and argues that “if trauma theory is to redeem its promise of cross-cultural ethical engagement, the sufferings of those belonging to non-Western or minority cultures must be given due recognition”

Open Document