Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of hand hygiene in healthcare
Literature review on hand hygiene
Hand hygiene case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of hand hygiene in healthcare
“The greatest cheap medical fix in all of history: the bar of soap” (Zugar). Soap has turned the commercial industry upside down by allowing the development of any and every kind of hand hygiene product to be created in order to soothe a person’s fear. Almost any kind of product imaginable to man is being made to keep germs on their toes. Ignaz Semmelweis is often credited to having been the first physician to enforce the germ theory of strengthening soap. In “1846” he encouraged hospitals to put to use a stronger form of soap that had an “antiseptic agent” in it consisting of a chloride solution (CDC 1). Today, however, handwashing is becoming one of the fastest growing medical concerns, due to the fact that hand hygiene can actually save a life. According to Nancy L. Pontius, a special correspondent writer for America.gov, “Every year, diarrhea and pneumonia kill more than 3.5 million children under age 5 worldwide. Many of them could have been saved by the simple act of washing hands” (United States. Dept. of State. Bur. of International Information Programs). Using effective hand hygiene, which hinders the spread of germs, is vital to the prevention of disease and preservation of life.
Handwashing offers many beneficial effects. One such benefit is that it helps prevent disease. According to the Wisconsin Division of Public Health, illnesses such as “influenza, streptococcus, syncytial virus, and the common cold can be avoided after coughing, sneezing, and shaking hands.” Often by not washing one’s hands, illnesses such as these are passed around unconsciously because little thought is put into what germs could be residing on a person’s hand. This person’s hand could be the hand that fixed lunch for a group of individuals at ...
... middle of paper ...
...ing, Public Health Laboratory Service, Bary Cookson, Gary French, Dinah Gould, Elizabeth Jenner, J McCulloch, Anne Palleh, M Schweigan, Geoffrey Schott, and Jennie Wilson. “Hand washing: a modest measure- with big effects.” British Medical Journal 318.7185 (1999): 686. PubMed. Web. 12 Oct. 2011.
United States. Dept. of State. Bur. of International Information Programs. 2008 Global Handwashing Day Promotes Hygiene Education by Nancy L. Pontius.1 Oct. 2008. Web. 11 Nov 2011.
“US needs hand with washroom etiquette (Survey of handwashing in public washrooms).” Medical Post 32.33 (1996): 6. LexisNexis. Web. 1 Nov 2011.
Wisconsin Division of Public Health. Dept. of Health Services. Handwashing. Sep. 2006. n.pag. Web. 12 Oct 2011.
Zugar, Abigail. “The Simplest Health Solutions? It’s complicated.” New York Times. New York Times, 26 Sep. 2011. n. pag. Web. 12 Oct 2011.
Parents and teachers encourage children to wash their hands with soap and water after using the bathroom, touching dirty objects, and sometimes before eating. Next to every tissue box there will most likely be a bottle of hand sanitizer that kills 99.9% of germs. Both hand soap and hand sanitizer kill off the germs and bacteria that can cause infections and diseases. Which one works best? The purpose of this experiment is to show which is more effective, hand soap or hand sanitizer (Bjornsson). To prove this, Bjornsson writes up a lab using the growth of bread mold to help identify the results of both products (Bjornsson). I believe that hand soap works better than hand sanitizers because doctors remind us that we should wash our hands especially during flu season to keep us healthy. Therefore, the hypothesis for this lab is that the hand soap will be the better alternative and will slow down the growth of bread mold more than the hand sanitizer in this experiment.
Health tips. Hand hygiene. (2009). Mayo Clinic Health Letter (English Ed.), 27(12), 3. Retrieved from
V. (2000). Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. The Lancet, 356(9238), 1307-1312.
“The CDC is the primary developer of national infection control and prevention guidelines, often in collaboration with its Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, which is responsible for research and dissemination of the latest information for preventing disease transmission” (Griffis, 2013, p. 175). Infection control will continue to be a topic of discussion as long as germ transmission is still happening. Among these studies is the concern the frequent nonadherence to contact precautions is a huge issue that many studies are still very concerned about (Jessee & Mion, 2013, p. 966). The writer is also concerned with the blatant disregard for hand hygiene that appears to be happening in the medical field. What about what is best for the patient. Do the people that do not use proper hand hygiene not understand how important it
Interestingly, two studies of the four compared the compliance rates of HCWs in particular nurses and physicians. Sharma, Puri, Sharma, & Whig (2011) found in their study that compliance rates for hand hygiene protocols was significantly higher for physicians (50.8%) as a opposed to nurses (41.3%). In contrast, Mathai, George, & Abraham (2011) had conflicting findings in which higher compliance rates were associated with nurses (45%) in comparison to physicians (17%). Both studies had similar sample sizes and were investigated in developing countries India and Pakistan; nonetheless, language barriers and varying educational levels of different staff groups, may have influenced the understanding of the need for effective hand hygiene (Mathai et al., 2011). Of four studies, three were observational studies, which provide opportunity to question the rigour of the
One of the most significant current discussions in nursing evidence-based practice is the effectiveness of hand hygiene interventions in reducing hospital-acquired infections. Much debate continues into the uncertainty that exists between the correlation of interventions and increased hand hygiene practices. This essay critically examines the relationship between interventions and the dubious increase in hand hygiene compliance by healthcare professionals by using the framework of evidence based practice to evaluate previous literature, identify barriers and note mechanisms used to measure effectiveness of interventions.
You need to always keep your hands clean. Your hands touch many things during the day and they come into contact with bacterium. If you do not wash your hands, it gives the chance for the bacteria to spread. This increases the risk of an individual contracting a number of illnesses such as the common cold, influenza and other harmful illnesses.
daily practice of washing their bacteria laden hands in water intended for a batch of
“Researchers in London estimate that if everyone routinely washed their hands, a million deaths a year could be prevented” (“Hygiene Fast Facts”, 2013, p. 1). Hands are the number one mode of transmission of pathogens. Hands are also vital in patient interaction, and therefore should be kept clean to protect the safety of patients and the person caring for the patient. Hand hygiene is imperative to professional nursing practice because it prevents the spread of pathogens, decreases chances of hospital-acquired infections, and promotes patient safety. There is a substantial amount of evidence that shows why hand hygiene is important in healthcare
Personal hygiene is something that every person - in every culture - of every age must attend to. While different cultures have different standards of cleanliness, it is something that everyone needs to consider according to Julia Twigg’s The Body and Bathing: Help with Personal Care at Home. Young children, youth, adults, and the elderly must all conform to these standards in one way or another. Due to age some people are incapable of keeping themselves adequate for the society’s sanitation customs. This requires them to acquire help of some sort, specifically when it comes to bathing. Young children and people of old age may need someone to help them bathe, although the approach to both body types is different. While they do share known similarities, the process of bathing people of different age changes the aspect of bathing itself through the eyes of the bather and the bathee.
...ng pathogens due to their close proximity to the home. In some cultures, adults believe that a child’s fecal matter is less hazardous than an adult’s, which results in adults handling the child’s feces more freely.7In order to dispel these myths, it is imperative to teach residents, particularly those in rural areas, about the importance of hand-washing. There are several marketing strategies that can be used to promote hand-washing, including pictorial stories, dramas, games, posters, group discussion, and radio and television campaigns.
Both family activity and corporate activity enforce individuals to help encourage others to wash their hands. There are several similarities in terms of percentages and also cautiousness provided to prevent the spread of germs. The effects that it causes are very identical however, each activity focuses on diverse successions needed. A family activities main point is to keep kids and adults healthy whereas a corporate activity focuses on improving health and increasing productivity. The visuals displayed for family activity show parents teaching their child good handwashing technique while on corporate activity there is an
Effective hand washing is one of the most effective ways to stop the spread of germs and to keep you from getting sick, because it prevents transmission of pathogens. But what exactly is the most effective way to wash hands?
Why is correct hand washing considered deviant? Hygiene education, for children in first world countries, is focused on proper procedure and how this protects them from germs and the spread of disease. It is ingrained into the minds of preschool children that the most important way they can prevent pathogen contamination is by washing their hands, with soap and water. Yet, even though this is an important habit, a large number of adults never continue with the hand washing techniques they learn in childhood. Through an analysis of the association of contamination in relation to hand washing techniques by female Australian university students, a reason for perceptions of deviance becomes evident. Variables such as social pressure and a strong
The results found where not as those hypothesised. Of all 8 swabs, bacteria were found on each sample. The results found that bacterial count peaked at its highest for high school aged students, with 3065000 bacterial cells being found on the senior 8-10 locker room female bathrooms. Also early learning centre students, whilst being the youngest held the least amount of bacteria on the bathroom door handle with only 12100 bacterial cells; only 3.3% of the bacterial count on senior locker rooms. It was predicted that there would be a gradual decrease of bacterial count on bathroom door handles as the age of the user increased, though as shown in figure 9, there was a significant increase in bacterial count from infant to teenager.