Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of income inequality in us
Social class and inequality
Negative effects of social classes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Within the United States operates a class system based on economic standing, though it is rarely spoken of or thought of as an issue. The classes divide the American population into three sections. The elite and wealthy upper class that controls most of the economy and government, the middle class who is made of finically stable and well-educated people, and the staggering lower class who live under poverty line. The United States are not the only or the first to struggle with class division, the separation creates a discrimination between classes and allows the higher and more “qualified” class to exploit and rule. There has been attempts to make the playing field so to say more equal, these come from the views of people like Marx and Lenin. Class division and privilege creates injustice and inequality through the ruling of a higher class, this systems has been in power under …show more content…
many names and the injustices can only be cured by the demolishment of the systems itself.
Within the United States there is an underlying class system, which controls the privilege of a person through their social and ethnical backgrounds. This system ranges by the following: the upper class being the in control of the majority of the nation’s wealth is the most privileged of the three, then comes the middle class which is diminishing and finally the lower class who is the least privileged and most discriminated against. “The richest twenty percent of Americans hold nearly eighty-five percent of the total household wealth in the country”. (Mantsios, 179) This fact shows that the upper class has domination over the two following classes, but more specifically the lower class. A privileged white man of
middle to high class is bound by social norms to be successful and live comfortably, but a colored woman of the lower class will by social norms struggle to pay rent. She will most likely not get a good education, or be able to afford college studies. She will be lucky to get a job outside a factory that pays enough to scrape by. Culture today gives us false hope that everyone has the chance to raise their class status. The colored woman would have been given hope since she was a girl that she could make it, but reality shows us most people will not make any more than their fathers do and will remain in the social class they are born into. In Mantsios he explains a simulation by playing a game of monopoly and letting the winner keep his winnings for the next game. (Mantsios, 188) This was to show how hard it is for the losers (lower class) to win after the winners (upper class) controls the wealth. The moral of the exercise is to prove the struggle to change class standing. Marxism offered alternate solutions to the struggle of the class division, his practices lead to communism in many Asian countries. Marxism was founded as a way to control class discrimination in many Asian and European countries. The class was a separated into two parts the equivalence to the upper class being called the “bourgeoisie” and the equivalence to the lower class the “proletariat”. The idea of oppressor and oppressed is another term used for the classes. This ideology became very strict but also very effective. Some of the ideas to control the bourgeoisie are: abolition of all rights of inheritance, equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture, and many more. (Marx, 859). The strict restrictions against the upper class, takes away their power and places it in the hands of the state. Creating the control of the government gives more people equal opportunity and ability to succeed.
Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.
According to Gregory Mantsios many American people believed that the classes in the United States were irrelevant, that we equally reside(ed) in a middle class nation, that we were all getting richer, and that everyone has an opportunity to succeed in life. But what many believed, was far from the truth. In reality the middle class of the United States receives a very small amount of the nation's wealth, and sixty percent of America's population receives less than 6 percent of the nation's wealth, while the top 1 percent of the American population receives 34 percent of the total national wealth. In the article Class in America ( 2009), written by Gregory Mantsios informs us that there are some huge differences that exist between the classes of America, especially the wealthy and the poor. After
In "Class in America", Gregory Mantsios says that "when politicians and social commentators draw attention to the plight of the poor, they do so in a manner that obscures the class structure and denies any sense of exploitation." Based off our readings, class discussion and films, income inequality is known to be erased or ignore. Our society frowns upon the expression of income in our daily conversations, as it could be seen braggy or a complaint depending on your status of income. Because it's frowned upon to talk about, the topic of income inequality becomes erased or ignored. In addition, income inequality in America's class structure can affect people's ability to reach their American Dream.
If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.
William Domhoff’s investigation into America’s ruling class is an eye-opening and poignant reading experience, even for enlightened individuals regarding the US social class system. His book, Who Rules America, exploits the fundamental failures in America’s governing bodies to provide adequate resources for class mobility and shared power. He identifies history, corporate and social hierarchy, money-driven politics, a two-party system, and a policy-making process orchestrated by American elites amongst a vast array of causes leading to an ultimate effect of class-domination theory pervading American society. In articulating his thesis and supporting assertions, Domhoff appeals rhetorically toward an audience with prior knowledge of America’s
In Mantsios’ “Class in America” he provides us with four myths about the United States. In one of these myths the idea is brought up that the United States is, at its core, a classless society. It is also states that whether rich or poor, everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. The myth also states that health care and education are provided to everyone regardless of their financial stability. This idea about a classless society is exactly what Mantsios claims it to be, a myth. It is untrue to state that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, and to believe that whatever differences exist in financial standing are insignificant. There are clear distinctions between different groups of people depending on their economic and social standing.
There is a high degree of social inequality within the United States. Of most modern industrial countries, the United Stated has some of the richest and some of the poorest people to be found. That fact is very disturbing, however, explains why much of the inequality exists in the US. In the following essay I will explain to you about the inequality in our country and why it occurs, based on the theoretical perspectives of a functionalist, conflict theorist, and social interationist.
Where would you consider yourself with your ranking in America 's social classes, are you upper class, middle class or even lower class? This is actually very important when it come to you receiving opportunities and in a sense special treatment. I’m referring to of course social inequality which is still very much alive in America and still affects a lot of families mostly in a negative way. This problem in America has grabbed the attention of two authors, Paul Krugman who wrote “Confronting Inequality” and Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy who wrote “The Upside of Income Inequality”. However, they both have different views on inequality Krugman believes that social inequality is only negative while on the other hand, Becker and Murphy believe
The highest earning fifth of U.S. families earned 59.1% of all income, while the richest earned 88.9% of all wealth. A big gap between the rich and poor is often associated with low social mobility, which contradicts the American ideal of equal opportunity. Levels of income inequality are higher than they have been in almost a century, the top one percent has a share of the national income of over 20 percent (Wilhelm). There are a variety of factors that influence income inequality, a few of which will be discussed in this paper. Rising income inequality is caused by differences in life expectancy, rapidly increases in the incomes of the top 5 percent, social trends, and shifts in the global economy.
I believe that there is too much wealth and income inequality in the United States
Income inequality not only harms us fiscally, but also affects our mental and physical wellbeing; therefore, it is important to identify the right ways to control wealth distribution among people.
The questions of economic inequality and class division are imposing themselves in the developing countries around the world. Karl Marx is notable for his extensive works on this questions, and his theories have been an informative source for many researchers to understand the process of social stratification and class conflicts. However, Marx does not specify what is economic power that is manipulated by the upper hand “the bourgeoisies”. Bourdieu and Weber stated that the power is not merely the manipulation of the mode of production and the working class, but it is a different instrument (George, 2001). This instrument is arguably given by different institutions to people, but this notion is contested among social theorists. Bourdieu holds that the economic instruments are given to people through the government and the government’s collaborators, and political economy is the precedent force in a spatial sense based on the theory of Habitués (Bourdieu, 1986). This essay is a preliminary attempt on an investigation of one dimension of how these instruments are the society’s manifestation of their economic identity strength against the others by using these tools. This paper focuses on the nature of these instruments in the context of the Emirati society, and the function of such instruments in shaping the beholder’s identities, in view of the close and intricate connection between such instruments and the society.
Paul Krugman, in his article “The Death of Horatio Alger” suggests that social mobility among classes in the United States is becoming more difficult by the day. Krugman explains that the idea of the American Dream and moving from class to class was once semi easily attainable; but is now seemingly impossible. Although America is thought of as a classless society, the country has a whole is moving into a caste society run by the rich.
Social and economic class is something we as Americans like to push into the back of our minds. Sometimes recognizing our class either socially or economically can almost be crippling. When individuals recognize class, limitations and judgment confront us. Instead, we should know it is important to recognize our class, but not let it define and limit us. In the essay, “Class in America”, Gregory Mantsios, founder and director of the Joseph S. Murphy Institute for Worker Education at the School of Professional Studies, brings to light the fact that Americans don’t talk about class and class mobility. He describes the classes in extremes, mainly focusing on the very sharp divide between the extremely wealthy and extremely poor. In contrast, George
America’s upper class has been getting richer since the past three decades, and we have still not found a way to stop this. We have been unable to find a way to distribute America’s wealth equally, so we can have a decent lower class and a good middle class. Inequality has caused many people to struggle in various ways, but their is alway another side to the story.