Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Events or factors that led to the civil war
Key factors of the civil war
What factors led to the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Events or factors that led to the civil war
There are numerous explanations for the “impending crisis” that led to the Civil War. Van Buren Administration’s unpopularity formed an aim at Presidency causing a nomination between Clay and Webster. They chose William Henry Harrison. John Tyler became a vice president nominee. Harrison won the election, but died a month later. Tyler was more extreme than Jackson, isolating him from his own party, and his proposal of the Texas annexation treaty was crushed. Whigs spurned Tyler, nominating Clay and Democrats put up James K. Polk. The Liberty Party, explicitly antislavery, which added another party to the presidential race drawing votes away. Frederick Douglas and Lincoln opposed the Mexican War, seeing it as a creation of slavery. Disputes with House and Senate paralyzed the nation. California’s admission as a state without slavery created a dilemma resulting in the Compromise of 1850. Clay’s efforts at a compromise failed. William Seward and Stephen Douglas made a deal for the passage of five bills, temporarily hushing matters. Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, exposed fear that gripped African Americans up north. The election of 1852 found Democrats calling for the Compromise of 1850. The Whigs were divided so they gave Scott, but Pierce won and the Whig party was disbanded. …show more content…
Distinctions between free labor and slave labor economies were vivid after 1840.
Technological advances and potency of soil on northern plains caused agricultural production in non-slave states, and the North saw a rise of a middle class. While slave-owners flourished, the number of slaves from Upper South to Deep South steered to a decline. Immigration caused a surge in nativism. The Irish tended to vote Democratic and the former Whigs and Free Soilers organized the American Party, better known as the “Know-Nothings.” Rise of the Republican Party could’ve been diverted by nativists’ impulses, but a new crisis carried a new impetus for political
reform. A bill banning slavery in Nebraska failed so Stephen Douglas presented the Kansas-Nebraska Act, representing the popular sovereignty. But its violation of the Missouri Compromise made a split in the Democratic Party between northern and southern wing. Lincoln got out of his political retirement. Pierce Administration’s bias toward southern territorial expansion goals in Mexico and Caribbean made matters worse. Efforts to organize Kansas where slavery would be banned vs. those wishing to permit slavery caused the creation of two territorial governments. Supporters of slavery set up at Lecompton, while antislavery were at Topeka. Anti-slavery forces supported the Republican Party so they put up Frémont. Pierce was unpopular so the Democrats put up Buchanan who won. Early in the Buchanan Administration, the Supreme Court decided Dred Scott v. Sandford, a slave whose owner moved him to free land to seek for his freedom. The Lecompton Constitution, backed by Buchanan, would’ve made Kansas a slave territory. Douglas, facing a re-election from Lincoln, enunciated the Freeport Doctrine. Buchanan’s unpopularity left the Democrats in a mess. Douglas was liked up north, but not the south since he refused to openly defend slavery. So the parties split into northern and southern wings: Douglas with the north while Breckinridge the south. Lincoln won by sweeping the free states. These demonstrations proved that the political parties were suffering a crisis. Slavery became a national debate, signifying the instability and weaknesses within the two main political parties; the Democrats and the Whigs. Slavery split the Democratic Party, dividing the party into northern and southern sections. Also, within the Democratic Party, the upsurge of new political parties such as the Know-Nothings & Republican Parties led to the end of the Whig Party. Overall, the political system was in jeopardy, meaning that the government was incapable to solve the issue of slavery, constitutional clashes, economic differentiations, and diverse political blunders.
During the time period of 1860 and 1877 many major changes occurred. From the beginning of the civil war to the fall of the reconstruction, the United States changed dramatically. Nearly one hundred years after the Declaration of Independence which declared all men equal, many social and constitutional alterations were necessary to protect the rights of all people, no matter their race. These social and constitutional developments that were made during 1860 to 1877 were so drastic it could be called a revolution.
On April 12, 1861, Abraham Lincoln declared to the South that, the only reason that separate the country is the idea of slavery, if people could solve that problem then there will be no war. Was that the main reason that started the Civil war? or it was just a small goal that hides the real big reason to start the war behind it. Yet, until this day, people are still debating whether slavery is the main reason of the Civil war. However, there are a lot of facts that help to state the fact that slavery was the main reason of the war. These evidences can relate to many things in history, but they all connect to the idea of slavery.
In conclusion the election of Lincoln as president in 1860 caused a civil war because it was falsely perceived by the south that Lincoln would threaten the state’s constitutional right to slavery. This false idea was due to a rift between the northern and southern states in both an economic and ideological manner. That is the north was based on industry and generally was opposed to slavery. But the South was an agricultural society which ran on slavery and, due to Nat Turner’s Insurrection and John Brown’s stand at Harper’s Ferry, was fearful of the north’s involvement in the governing of states as well as being opposed to this on the basis of state’s rights. The election of Lincoln caused the south to succeed from the union causing civil war.
In the years paving the way to the Civil War, both north and south were disagreeable with one another, creating the three “triggering” reasons for the war: the fanaticism on the slavery issue, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the separation of the Democratic Party. North being against the bondage of individuals and the South being for it, there was no real way to evade the clash. For the south slavery was a form of obtaining a living, without subjugation the economy might drop majorly if not disappear. In the North there were significant ethical issues with the issue of subjugation. Amazing measures to keep and dispose of subjugation were taken and there was never a genuine adjusted center for bargain. Despite the fact that there were a lot of seemingly insignificant issues, the fundamental thing that divided these two states was bondage and the flexibilities for it or against. With these significant extremes, for example, John Brown and Uncle Tom's Cabin, the south felt disdain towards the danger the Northerners were holding against their alleged flexibilities. The more hatred the South advanced, the more combative they were to anything the Northerners did. Northerners were irritated and it parted Democrats over the issue of bondage and made another Republican gathering, which included: Whigs, Free Soilers, Know Nothings and previous Democrats and brought about a split of segments and abbreviated the street to common war. Southerners loathed the insubordination of the north and started to address how they could stay with the Union.
The increasingly diverging economies of the North and South resulted in the development of different political and social ideologies. The South’s agrarian economy resulted in wealthy plantation owners investing their money into slaves, leading to weak institutions and little innovation. While New England’s economy benefited from factories and business ventures. New Englanders invested in transportation and internal improvements. Divisions surrounding taxes, tariffs, internal improvements and states rights versus federal rights was most prominent during the 1850’s. This period was most renown for it’s political compromises and violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery figures. Growing sectionalism
In the years leading up to the Civil War, there was great conflict throughout the United States. The North and South had come to a crossroads at which there was no turning back. The Secession Crisis is what ultimately led to the Civil War. The North and the South disagreed on slavery and what states would be free states. The South despised Lincoln's election and rose up in revolt by forming the Confederate States of America.
The main problem in every event leading up to the Civil War involved the issue of slavery, making slavery the main cause of the war. The initial blame for the war can be pointed at America’s founding fathers who knew slavery violated every aspect of America’s liberty, but yet they still did not prohibit slavery. If it was not the election of President Lincoln that caused South Carolina to secede from the Union, allowing other states to follow, a different event would have triggered the war, making the Civil War inevitable. All in all, the Civil War was bound to happen and it became the bloodiest war in American history.
The end of the Mexican-American War in 1848, the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott Decision of 1857, John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1859, and the outcome of the Presidential Election of 1860 all helped contribute to southern secession and the start of the Civil War. They each caused conditions that either strengthened the abolitionist cause, strengthened the pro-slavery cause, or strengthened both causes respectively; although the conditions made many Southerners want to leave the United After winning the Mexican-American War in 1848, the United States gained the western territories, which included modern-day California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, as well as parts of Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma. However, controversial topics, that helped cause the Civil War, arose with the addition of these new territories. Primarily, the people of the United States wanted to know whether the new territories would be admitted as free states or slave states. In order to avoid fighting between the slave states of the South and the free states of the North, Henry Clay (Whig) and Stephen Douglas (Democrat) drafted the Compromise of 1850.... ...
Instead of easing tension, the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act triggered political discord, and intensified the slavery issue, ultimately leading to Civil War. The Compromise of 1850 was proposed by Henry Clay when problems arose as California applied for statehood.Capturing the interest of both sides, the compromise enabled California to enter the Union as a free state, while the Mexican Cession was divided into two territories. In this area, popular sovereignty would decide whether slavery would be allowed. However, when the compromise was introduced, both northerners and southerners were displeased with what was offered. John C. Calhoun showed his displeasure by writing, “I have, senators, believed from the first that the agitation of the subject of slavery would, i...
When victory in the Mexican War resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question was now whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery increased , creating a bigger gap between the states who wanted slaves and the states that did not have slavery . the new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, and accepted the problem of the expansion of slavery, Which caused north carolina and other states to secede causing the whole problem, leading to the civil war.
Revolution occurs when two popular forces occupying one area lose reality of their relation to each other. The same can be said for the American Civil War and the leading events that amounted into turmoil. The Southern way of life was trampled over and forgotten by the manufacturers, abolitionists and westward expansionist of the North. However, these people did not move alone, there was a present constitutional and social upheaval that turned the North against South and their way of living delegitimize as “American”. From the social status of African Americans, to the economic devastation in the South that came with the Civil War, America came out a much different nation than previously conceived by the end of 1877 which would have impacts
In the 19th century, The United States was experiencing a profound era of reform. Along with the development of the nation, sectionalism began to intensify as well. Thus, the northern and southern states began to acknowledge a divide in America. The differences that manifested between the two groups largely concerned economic and political interests. Both the north and south sought to protect their own stability and promote the welfare of their own systems. Eventually, the growing tension would result in southern secession and a war. The Civil War would be fought for many dynamic reasons, however, three causes include the following: the northern usurpation on the stability of the South’s economy, the north disregarding the Dred-Scott versus
By the year of 1860, the North and the South was developed into extremely different sections. There was opposing social, economic, and political points of view, starting back into colonial periods, and it slowly drove the two regions farther in separate directions. The two sections tried to force its point of view on the nation as a whole. Even though negotiations had kept the Union together for many years, in 1860 the condition was unstable. The presidential election of Abraham Lincoln was observed by the South as a risk to slavery and many believe it initiated the war.
The Civil War has been viewed as the unavoidable eruption of a conflict that had been simmering for decades between the industrial North and the agricultural South. Roark et al. (p. 507) speak of the two regions’ respective “labor systems,” which in the eyes of both contemporaries were the most salient evidence of two irreconcilable worldviews. Yet the economies of the two regions were complementary to some extent, in terms of the exchange of goods and capital; the Civil War did not arise because of economic competition between the North and South over markets, for instance. The collision course that led to the Civil War did not have its basis in pure economics as much as in the perceptions of Northerners and Southerners of the economies of the respective regions in political and social terms. The first lens for this was what I call the nation’s ‘charter’—the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the documents spelling out the nation’s core ideology. Despite their inconsistencies, they provided a standard against which the treatment and experience of any or all groups of people residing within the United States could be evaluated (Native Americans, however, did not count). Secondly, these documents had installed a form of government that to a significant degree promised representation of each individual citizen. It was understood that this only possible through aggregation, and so population would be a major source of political power in the United States. This is where economics intersected with politics: the economic system of the North encouraged (albeit for the purposes of exploitation) immigration, whereas that of the South did not. Another layer of the influence of economics in politics was that the prosperity of ...
I believe that the election of Abraham Lincoln took a great part in the succession that caused the Civil War. The Southerners were afraid of this because Lincoln favored the Union and has said that he would try to “preserve it”. They believed that Lincoln would abolish slavery; which he was against slavery, but stated that he wouldn’t interfere with it. This was one of the main reasons, if not the main reason, of why the Southerners left the Union, thus causing a War between the Union and the Confederates.