Civics Education Across America Analysis

1238 Words3 Pages

Civics Education Across America Civics education is empowering, timely, important, and unfortunately, lacking. As a required curriculum for high school graduation, civics education is considered to be an essential aspect to teenagers’ education, but that doesn’t stop teachers from failing to inform young people of their role in our political society. Author Chester E. Finn Jr. wrote “The Failure of Civics Education” which highlights the importance of teaching civil education early in a person’s life. Erika Christakis wrote “The War on Public Schools” which discusses the lack of attention that public schools have and touches on the subject of civics education within public schools. Both authors give efficient arguments and statistics that support …show more content…

Finn Jr. begins by claiming high school students are not learning much civics. According to the Education Commission of the States, taking high school civics is a graduation requirement. Fewer than one-fourth of high school seniors could supply a sufficient answer to a question regarding the role citizens have in changing laws. There is a continuing awareness to the unsolved problem of lack of civics education. The failure of educating students on civics was brought to our attention in a recent survey conducted by John Villasenor. Villasenor polled a number of students to gauge their understanding of the First Amendment, one of the most basic and fundamental aspects of civics education. On the other hand, Finn. Jr. brings attention to the opposing view of civics education. Civics curricula can overemphasize citizens’ rights at the expense of their responsibilities. Villasenor concluded that many college students are unaware of their rights that come with the First Amendment. Colleges must clean up their acts, but this won’t be very easy given the faculty members’ wimpishness and campus leaders’ behaviors. Parents, community groups, churches and coaches all share this responsibility. Fifty states today believe they are teaching civics, but truly aren’t. This is a serious issue. In addition to this intense issue, public schools are facing a dilemma as well …show more content…

The second article introduces the significance of their issue by quoting two authority figures, Barack Obama and George W. Bush, who agree with her stance on the issue with our school system. Article one describes the importance of civics education in the college setting. On the other hand, article two focuses mainly on civics education in a public-school setting, going along with the article’s main issue. Article one describes the neglect of civics education outside of school. Finn Jr. talks about the role parents, teachers, and coaches have in civics education as well. Article two mentions neglect of civics education, but stays centered on the neglect of public schools all together. Christakis mentions how the neglect of public schools makes it hard to defend the need for public schools at all. In article one, the solution for the issue discussed is for colleges to clean up their act. Finn Jr. puts the responsibility on college leaders and faculty. In contrast, the second article proposes the solution of renewing our commitment to the idea that public schools are a worthy investment to young

Open Document