Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast movies and books
Compare and contrast movies and books
Comparing movies and books essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast movies and books
Imagine living underground, but not knowing forever. This place they raise people not knowing that there was somewhere where there was light -- only knowing The City of Ember. Jeanne Duprau wrote this book. Lina and Doon know something’s wrong with Ember. They noticed that multiple blackouts have been happening in a week and have been longer. They are determined to find the way out of Ember and save the city. With hard work and determination they find there way out of Ember. The City of Ember has many similarities and differences between the novel and the film; however the film was a more entertaining experience. The book and movie have many similarities… but here are some of the main ones. The first similarity is the instructions are ripped. The reason that this is an important and main similarity is because if the instructions were not ripped the whole story would be backwards and they would make it out of Ember perfectly fine. The second important similarity is Lizzy dropping the cans. This is very important because if Lizzy hadn’t dropped the cans they would …show more content…
The first one is Doon has a talk with his dad about the exit. This is important because in the novel Doon said that he wanted to surprise his dad, not tell him. Secondly, the mayor gets eaten by a beatle in the movie. This is important because this means that the mayor died in the movie, unlike the book. Lastly, they hide together. This is important because in the novel they hide in different places, and Lina got caught by the guards. The movie was better than the novel. The first reason is because the movie added more detail. For example, it added the mole chasing Lina and Doon, and the mole killing the mayor. Secondly, it has more adventure. For instance, when the river stopped and Doon almost fell!! Lastly, it had more intensity. At the end of the movie the city was destroyed because of the pressure of the
Another similarity in the book and movie is that the characters have to go against their morals in order to decide what to do in certain situations. An example of this in the book is when Skip realises he would have to trespass and steal in order for him to keep himself and his friends alive. Or in...
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
...d coloring of certain images. The novel, however, puts much greater emphasis on the imagination and creativity, and on the main character Tita. The novel really makes the reader feel Titas pain and grow with her as she discovers her freedom, whereas the movie failed to achieve this. Moreover, the movie tends to ignore the significant of 3 integral motifs, cooking, tears and sensuality.
The movie lacks a lot of insight onto the other characters in the book, it mostly focuses on Ponyboy. For example, in the movie there was a lack of detail on characters such as Darry and Sodapop even Dally. Dally was a major character in the book but his death in the movie seemed a bit minor because there wasn’t much detail for viewers to get attached to his character. I felt as if his death was glazed over and easily forgotten in the movie while in the book it was described for at least two pages.
The movie, unlike the book, starts in chronological order. The book starts from Susie’s death and then flashbacks to what happened before. Another difference is that the bracelet charm in the movie is not the Pennsylvania keystone, but a house. Also, even though some things happen in both, book and movie, not every time the reasons are the same. For example
The book the and the movie City of Ember are great with lots of emotion and excitement. Jeanne Duprau is the author of the book, were comparing and contrasting the book the City of Ember and the movie the City of Ember. The book is about the main characters Lina and Doon that are 12 years old and want to find an exit out of Ember. The City of Ember is underground the world with lights everywhere so they can see and sometimes the lights go out and everyone worries they will not come back on. The City of Ember has many similarities and differences between the novel and the film; however the film was a more entertaining experience.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
In both the movie and the book, the characters names are the same and the setting is the same. Johnny kills Bob in both of them. They go to the Windrixville church and the poem, “Nothing Gold Can Stay” by Robert Frost is in both. “‘Nothing Gold Can Stay.’ I was remembering a poem I read once.”(Hinton77) The church catches fire and both Johnny and Dally die in the movie and in the book.
...rtrayed differently in the movie. Lennie is shown as being very mentally challenged, whereas in the book he is just a little slow and has a mind of a young child. Although some changes are made in the movie to make it flow better, it is still based on the same story as the book. The movie has the same plot line and characters, and some of the scenes are told in the exact same way as they are in the novel. As well, the movie and the book give out the same themes. This story is about how all the people in the Great Depression were trying to escape their unhappy, lonely lives, but weren’t capable of doing so. The movie stays very true to the book even though some things are removed or added. Everything that is added or changed still works very well and captures the film perfectly.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
Another example is when Chance watches television. In the book, the narrator explains that when Chance changes the channel, he feels like he is changing himself. As he changes the channel, he gets caught up in all the different images he sees. In the movie, all you see is a man watching television, which doesn't explain too much. In the movie, the only time we find out what Chance thinks of television is when he is talking to someone else.
These differing scenes and scenarios between the novel and the movie provide more intricate underlying and supporting aspects