Christopher Polk And Fedex's Religious Beliefs

Does the style of your hair truly represent a religious belief, or does it hinder how a company is viewed by it customers? If you look at it from the view of the company and how it feels you should look to represent the organization, hairstyle can be subject being labeled as not business or professional in nature. In the case of Christopher Polk and FedEx, Mr. Polk decided that he would grow his hair out into dreadlocks based on a decision to follow the beliefs of Rastafarian (Bethel, 2017). Mr. Polk at already worked for FedEx and knew their policy on grooming, especially when it comes to being in a position that interact with the customers of the company. He knew that the company did not approve of that style of hair, but when he watched

In this case FedEx seems to have tried different approaches to work with Mr. Polk to allow him to keep the hairstyle. One way was to offer him a different position that did not have him dealing with customers. However, this also meant that Mr. Polk would have to take a pay cut, which he did not want to do. FedEx then told Mr. Polk that he needs to cut his hair to meet the grooming standards of a “reasonable style” or take another position (Bethel, 2017). Mr. Polk refused both options, so at that time FedEx terminated him based on violation of grooming policy. Also, during this time FedEx terminated six other employees for the same reasons but does not go into specifics about if it was based on hairstyles or other grooming issues. The issue and questions now are, did FedEx have the right to fire Mr. Polk, and did they violate his religious practice in doing

One question that needs to be answered is should Mr. Polk be allowed be allowed to violate company policy on grooming based on his religious proclamation? Yes, based on the Title VII definition of a belief under religious preference which allows Mr. Polk to have the dreadlock hairstyle. However, the company tried diverse ways to accommodate him in the sense they did not want him interacting with customers. The company could have tried to develop an alternate with maybe him wearing hair cover while working that was presentable so that the customers did not see his hair. If he still refused, then I believe the company should have the right to terminate his employment because they tried to accommodate his belief and he