Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion dilemma and religion
Pro-choice vs pro-life debate
Pro life and pro choice abortion arguments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abortion dilemma and religion
Christians Response to Abortion and Euthanasia
Abortion, the premature expulsion of the foetus from the womb, is
considered a sin and is forbidden in Roman Catholic Christian
religion. The Roman Catholic Christians (RCC’s) are very strict and
some would not even consider it if the mothers life was in danger.
Christians believe that you have to have faith in God and you have to
except the life you are given. In Christianity the unborn child is
considered human even at the very early stages of life, as in the
embryo or foetus, and life is a gift from god that is not yours to
take away. In Britain abortion used to be a crime but in 1967 MP David
steel introduced a bill to the House of Commons, which became the
abortion act of 1967. This act was amended in 1990 and applies to the
whole of the UK except for Northern Ireland. The law in the UK says
that an abortion can be preformed up to the end of the 24th week of
pregnancy if two doctors agree to it.
Some Christians believe that abortion is an option only in the most
extreme circumstances, such as rape and incest, and if having the baby
would affect the mental or physical well being of the mother.
Christians might also accept abortion if the family of the unborn
child could not cope and give the baby the basic necessities. However
Christians along with the churches have come up with away around this
circumstance, they have set up charities and homes for children that
cant be looked after by their parents. The orphans can also be put
into foster care or be put up for adoption. Even though this is a long
process, it is a much better way than killing the unborn child.
Abortion is always the last resort for Christians.
We can always talk about Christians in general and what they would do
if they had the choice between an abortion and going ahead with the
pregnancy, but we need to
Consider the personal effects of abortion.
a right to an abortion if she and her doctor decide upon it". (pg. 105,
To be able to get an abortion, there are many restrictions that apply. Every state may different but similar restrictions when the law was formed in 1973. Even with the restrictions, many women were still choosing abortions. “The mandatory restrictions include: waiting periods typically from 24-48 hours before women receive the procedure; counseling stressing the disadvantages of abortions; requirements that minors notify their parents or receive their consent before obtaining an abortion; and prohibitions on providing abortions at public facilities,” (Glazer 1). Some women either could
when a life begins for a human. If society is to assume that a fetus is a human
Rationale for banning abortions late in pregnancy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 744-747, 1998. Guttmacher Institute. State Policies on Later-Term Abortions. State Policies in Brief.
that matters is that of the woman the rule "life for a life, burn for
Christian Responses to Abortion and Euthanasia Different Christians have different viewpoints on the issues of Abortion and Euthanasia. The Church of England states that life is god given and is to be; ‘Nurtured, supported and protected. ’ It views ending a human life at the beginning or end as; ‘A great moral evil.’ Also they have stated a case for ‘The rights of humans to be valued.’
Abortion is a procedure carried out to terminate a pregnancy. In 1967, liberal Member of Parliament David Steel introduced the Abortion Act. This legally permitted abortion to be carried out by a medical practitioner in England, Scotland and Wales (Glennerster 2000). Since the implementation of this policy, numbers of abortion have gradually increased. In 2010 almost two hundred thousand procedures were carried out in England and Wales, ninety-six per cent of which were funded by the National Health Service (Department of Health 2011). To access the strengths and weaknesses of abortion regulation a number of areas must be considered. Following a brief section about the background and development of abortion policy, the legal requirement of two doctor consent will be discussed. Repercussions of this legality will be used to justify why the requirement is considered an outdated obligation that weakens abortion regulation. The extent of abortion provision will then be argued as a weakness by sending a troubling message to society. This will interconnect with the need for restrictions in abortion provision, a concept supported by the further discussion of related health risks. Counterarguments will then consider the procedure step by step and suggest that regulations enable a process efficient and suitable for both the hospital and patient. Finally, medicalisation will be discussed as the most prominent strength of the British approach to abortion in regards to safety.
Explain how Christians might put their beleifs about abortion into action. Many Christians beleive that it is their duty to be a stweard of the Earth and all its inhabitants as taught by the Bible. They also beleive that an unborn child falls into this catagory, because of this many Christians turn their faith into action by joining a pro-life organisation. However, there are also Christians who are pro-choice, meaning they beleive that the pregnant women should have the right to decide whether she wants a child or not. To take action for their beleifs a pro-life Christians could do many things or join many different organisations, or they could just be open about their view in disscussions.
Christians' Response to Abortion Contraception: A means of stopping conception (pregnancy) taking place by chemical or mechanical means. Abortion: Stopping the development of a foetus by chemical or mechanical means. There are many viewpoints on contraception from the different Christian churches. Most couples in today’s times feel they have the need to control the amount of children they have.
Euthanasia, Abortion and the Church The Catholic Church has consistently taught that respect for human life is one of the most essential aspects of our faith. Life includes love, respect, community, and family. Each person is entitled their right to life, a responsibility to God, to live out their life from natural birth to natural death. Unfortunately, there have been horrifying incidents where people commit murders, assault and manipulate other people. One of the Ten Commandments clearly states
The catholic view of euthanasia is that euthanasia is morally wrong. it has always been
Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.
In English common law, abortion was only a crime is perform after the quickening ( when a mother first detects fetal movement)
when the foetus is in side the womb it is not a person yet. Others say
While I, along with many other pro-life advocates, believe that human life is set into motion the minute of conception, there is a major group of individuals who would beg to differ. They are strong believers that the embryo is only “potential human”. Many abortionists place confidence in the idea that the embryo is not to be considered as a full human, due to the idea that it is depending fully on its mother. Although this reasoning seems plausible, when analyzed a little deeper, that does not seem to be the case. Imagine the following scenario. A man is driving down the busy road on his motorcycle. All of a sudden, the man loses control of his bike and collides with a car passing him on the road. This man is then rushed to the emergency room where the doctors discover that, although blessed to still be alive, he is completely paralyzed. He now depends exclusively on the health care providers, family and friends for all aspects of his life which he used to be able to complete independently. Does this full dependence on others dehumanize him in any way? No. This man is still a human “by nature”. The paralyzed man’s situation is now comparably similar to the human embryos’. According to the textbook Basics of Biology, life starts at fertilization. This is when the sperm joins the oocyte. In order to distinguish whether an organism is living or not, there are several crucial char...