Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experiment of chloroplast
Experiment of chloroplast
Experiment of chloroplast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Experiment of chloroplast
For part one of the experiment, my team asked the question of which cell fraction of the measured pea seedlings will have a higher ratio of chloroplasts? My group tested for the activity of chloroplasts with three different pairs of cell fractions by two conditions of light and dark in three readings. The first two cell fractions, pellet one and two (P1, P2), are the hard sediments found at the bottom of a tube after it has been centrifuged (which are specimen, like the mitochondria and chloroplast, that are isolated from the rest) (Leicht and McAllister, 2016). The last cell fraction used was the supernatant two (S2), which is just the free liquid surrounding the pellet after the centrifuging of P2 (Leicht and McAllister, 2016). To test for this, DCIP (a chloroplast isolation buffer) was used to
The hypothesis for this experiment was that the cell fraction in the cuvette marked P2 will have more chloroplast activity because it will exhibit greater color change and differences in the absorbance readings compared to the other cuvettes when exposed under the condition of light; moreover, this notion was believed to be so because the more a cell fraction is centrifuged, the more intact chloroplasts we’ll find (Leicht and McAllister,
This meant that this cuvette (tested under light) should display a higher decrease in DCIP due to the reduction in absorbance (dependent variable) opposed to the other cell fractions tested depending on a sixteen minute period (independent variable). The overall goal was to provide proof, through data, that the cell fractions put under the light during the sixteen minute period would indicate a higher set of chloroplast activity versus the ones put in the
the replicate shows the same trend as the first experiment. I used a measuring cylinder and a beaker to measure out the amounts of water; however these did not seem to affect the quality of my results. To increase the accuracy of my results I could have perhaps used a burette. Even though I did the best I could to keep the experiment accurate, I did. some places there were mistakes that unintentionally occurred.
Experiment #1: The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the effects of baking soda and light intensity on the rate of photosynthesis of green spinach leave through the observation of floating disk.
= > [CH2O} + O2 + H2O, This shows that when the light intensity is increased the rate of reaction will be more quicker he only anomalous result there was, is the one in the 100 watt result the reading after 5 minutes is anomalous because it does not follow the predicted pattern of increasing in the production of gas because it is lower I know from my own knowledge of photosynthesise that when the light intensity is increased the rate of reaction will be more quicker because many plants and trees photosynthesise quicker in stronger light and photosynthesise slower in dimly lit places. The chlorophyll absorbs light energy and enables it to be used by the plant for building up sugar. The overall effect is that energy is transferred from sunlight to sugar molecules.
Yes the hypothesis was supposed, which was "Germinating seed would take in more oxygen because they are actively going through cellular respond growing. This is shown in the data when looking at the Corrected Difference at 5 minutes germinating peas was at .05 and dry peas with beads was only .01, then looking at the data at the end at 20 minutes germinating peas were at .24 and dry peas and beads were at .04. The germinating were ahead of the dry peas with taking in more oxygen. The independent variable was the germination of the peas. The dependent variable was the amount of oxygen consumption. Germinating peas are growing and going through cellular respiration at a higher rate, this effects oxygen consumption because because the higher the
A cuvette was filled 3/ 4ths of the way and the absorbance measured in a spectrophotometer. The data was compiled as a class and recorded. The Spectrophotometer was blanked using a test tube of distilled water.
the effect light has on the growth of pea plants. It will take place in an environment with controlled light, with equal amounts of plants being grown in the light and in the dark. All elements of the experiment other than light will be kept the same, such as amount of seeds in each pot, amount of soil in each pot and amount of water given to each plant each day. This will ensure a fair experiment. Prediction: I predict that in general, the plants grown in the light will grow better than those grown in the dark.
Analyze each fraction by spotting 10 times with capillary tubes on a TLC plate, which is exposed to iodine vapor for 15 minutes.
They are five to 10 micrometers long and one to .5 micrometers wide. They main
the distance from the light source to the plant. Output - The rate of photosynthesis is to be measured by counting the bubbles of oxygen produced by the plant every two minutes, and therefore finding the rate of photosynthesis. Control - The amount of water available to the Elodea will stay the same. same level as the 400 cm3 beaker. The colour of the lamp will stay the same (yellow) as to plants Chlorophyll easily absorbs blue light.
Constants: The constants in this experiment will consist of the same yeast added in each flask, the same brand will be used for each to prevent any interference with accuracy of the results. The source of water (tap water) will be the same for all levels of the independent variable. and control while the beakers filled with solutions and control will all be the same size for each trial.digital
To help understand the experiments preformed, lets decipher what each of these cells do. IDENTIFY EACH OF THE FACTORS AND WHAT IS THERE FUNCTION. NEXT TALK ABOUT THE EXPERIMENTS PREFORMED AND WHAT WAS THE RESULT OF EACH OF THEM
The black vertical lines indicate the range of outliers in the data. The blue boxes represent the normal distribution of data within each sample. The black horizontal line included in the blue boxes represents the average for each sample. Growth rates were calculated using the equation µ = (1/t)*ln(N/No). “Here “µ” is the specific growth rate (in units of t-1) and “t” is the duration of the time over which you were measuring growth. For our purposes, “No” is the concentration of chlorophyll at the beginning of the experiment and “N” is the concentration of chlorophyll after time t has elapsed. Although “N” and “No” usually refer to actual numbers of cells, we will be using changes in bulk phytoplankton chlorophyll-a as a proxy for cell number.”(OCN 310
The overarching purpose for this experiment is to determine if the amount of light shining on a radish seed impacts it in positive or negative ways. Our hypothesis was, if we expose more light on the radish seeds over the course of three days, then it will germinate at a faster rate. After collecting two sets of data over the course of two weeks and closely observing the radish seed for 3 days, the hypothesis was not supported by the data. Even though during the first week of tests done on the radish seeds showed that the amount of light doesn’t really impact the radish seeds because there was 100% germination in all three levels of light after three days. Nonetheless, after performing the experiment a second time, it was evident that the radish seeds need a balance between light and no light, which was supported by the data in the second experiment.
1ml of this culture, i.e., 1% inoculum was added to 100ml liquid LB. The mixture is shaken and 4ml of this mix is taken in a cuvette and its optical density is measured at 600nm using a spectrophotometer, this is the 0 minute reading. The flask is incubated at 37°C in an incubator shaker. Then after 1hour another reading was taken for 4ml of the mixture. Subsequent readings were taken after 2,3,4..upto 18 hours. The O.D was reported in a tabulated form .Then a graph was plotted using these
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.