Chivalry: The Role Of Benevolent Sexism In Modern Society

1218 Words3 Pages

Chivalry is not dead: it is sexist. Chivalrous actions and beliefs are benevolently sexist in a positive yet demeaning way. Benevolent sexism has a profound effect on social interaction and attitudes between genders. Authors such as Allen G. Johnson, Michael T. Schmitt and James H. Wirth, and Kathleen Connelly and Martin Heesacker agree that a male-centered society utilizes benevolent sexism to reinstate its relevancy and use. In my research, I have gathered a set of sources with information regarding benevolent sexism and its usage by patriarchy. Most agree that benevolent sexism is a perspective that is prevalent in modern society. My research revealed that authors view benevolent sexism in different ways.
Schmitt and Wirth describe benevolent …show more content…

Schnabel et al observed that those who endorse benevolent sexism act within traditional gender roles through cross-gender helping (56). The authors of the study “The Allure of Sexism” also discuss women maintaining traditional gender roles in relation to benevolent sexism (Hammond et al 423). This achieves the appearance of equality: promoting a system which accounts for the strengths and weaknesses of certain genders and places each into a role that works with the other seamlessly (Connelly and Heesacker 434). Johnson disagrees with the idea that these divisions are specific to one gender, implying that they “are no more about maleness than they are about femaleness” …show more content…

It can set women on a pedestal, but still separate them from being equal to men (Hammond et al “Allure of Sexism” 424). Schmitt and Wirth found that both men and women are likely to self-stereotype with traits emphasized by benevolent sexism, especially among groups of their own gender (430). Women who are exposed to benevolent sexism are happy with their position in society, but are less likely to pursue equality and aspire for self-success in academic and professional settings (Hammond et al “Internalizing Sexism” 215). This gives justification to stereotypes in academic settings, as explained in an essay by Jesse J. Prinz, “Gender and Geometry”. Prinz examines the oppression of women in the 19th and 20th centuries, evidenced by the belief that women were no more intelligent than children (628). Women who are in a benevolently sexist environment do not perform well at their duties and do not feel very competent, shown by Hammond et al (“Allure of Sexism” 423) and Schnabel et al (56) in their respective

Open Document