Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elements of chivalry in the knight's tale
Chivalry in the knights tale
Elements of chivalry in the knight's tale
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elements of chivalry in the knight's tale
Chivalry, or the chivalrous code, is a code of conduct covered with the medieval institution of knighthood from which the western idea of good manners developed. It means that people sacrifice or give up something they have then achieve some specific purpose. People like to praise this spirit, but not everyone is willing to do so. This spirit can be traced back to the song of Roland 1100 C.E. Roland, a Frankish military leader under Charlemagne, made an arrogant decision in not choosing to blow the horn to signal Charlemagne’s troops to his aid. He thought his death was the result of his loyalty to his lord, even though Oliver, Roland’s best friend and brother-in-law, argued about Roland’s command decision and advised probably would have saved …show more content…
the rearguard. Roland dies a martyr. He dies of a self. The significance seems to be perfect fealty to the lord. Nowadays, more and more people have disobedient ideas by nature that it may end up costing us far more than we have ever thought, including immorality, crimes, and other sinful activities. Strong states that “death of Roland” which obviously presents the significant value of fealty . There are three main methods to cause that fealty can help leader control society well, including faith, responsibility, and honor. The first method that causes people have fealty is that leader should set up a righteous faith as their policy. The reason that Roland can prevail over all dissenting views and decide not to blow the horn is as an Christian, his faith is greater than anything. At that time, each empire uses a religion as their state religion. It is an established church that is a religious group accepted by the state to control their people in mind. This kind of action is limited in person, but it is successful in military management. According to the Song of Roland, “The glory of Roland’s death contradicts such an interpretation. he dies a martyr. The significance seems to be lie less in his flaws than in how his perfect fealty to the Lord, as shown in particular by his recognition of the absoluteness of the values that the Franks are fighting for in Spain and his refusal to compromise with Saracens, makes his flaws irrelevant.” Basically , people always want to be improved, despite the impenetrable policy. In this case, the fealty that is given by faith can helpfully limit people’s ideas about the revolt. Furthermore, responsibility is a necessary attitude for a team work.
When team member do not take responsibility for their actions, some managers may hope that the problem goes away. Others may try to remove these people from their team completely. The situation is likely to get worse if people just leave it alone. For example, Roland, as a military leader under Charlemagne, his decision determines the lives of rearguard and troops of Charlemagne. Each of his action must be responsible for his subordinates and their families. Oliver also was entangled, but he preferred to blow the horn to save rearguard in his position. However, in Roland’s position, his responsibility is to protect his Lord Charlemagne. His responsibility makes him not blow the horn and call his lord back, because that may cause damage to his lord and more people get into trouble. The poet balances these two as equally “marvelous vassals” depending on different positions. As Roland, his decision sacrifices him and the rearguard, but ensures the safety of his lord. On the other side, Oliver wants to save the rearguard because he is kind of vassal of Roland. He has to consider the safety of Roland and rearguard first, so he wants to blow the horn. In other words, people always make a decision based on their own responsibility that is related to their direct aim in order to swore their fealty to their
ruler. As the effect of religion becomes more and more influenced in a nation, honor will occur in everybody’s heart so that honor becomes a particular aim that people pursue and make efforts to achieve it. Nicole emphasizes,“Throughout the medieval epic, the Song of Roland would make reader believe that Christians have the upper hand as a result of their favor with God.” Roland said to be noble vassals not only of Charlemagne, but ultimately of God himself. In that time, the most honorable role for any man was to be a vassal and serve a worthy lord. Even though Roland decides not to blow the horn to signal the aid, God overlooks this sin of pride and he dies a martyr as his soul is taken directly to heaven. In a feudal notions, it is ingrained that people are baptized by religion. The honorable and high death is the result of his fealty to his lord. For honor, unlike the more stable value of dignity, people would fight whatever they win or lose. It seems be the sublimation of faith, but it already becomes an aim that people pursue at all costs. All in all, fealty gradually becomes a required component of standard that leaders need since medieval epic. Roland and Oliver both are “marvelous vassals” based on different positions. Both they want to protect their lord and perform their fealty. Roland’s death scene is one of the most powerful and memorable scenes in French literature, and his soul is escorted to heaven by saints and angels. From his fealty to his lord, it reflects how modern lead should control well society and people by some methods, including faith, responsibility, and honor. On the whole, fealty surely affects and changes people’s mind and action gradually.
The code of Chivalry can be described as a brave, loyal, courteous, distinguished courage or ability that is admired for their brave and noble qualities. Chivalry is a system of ethical ideals that arose from feudalism and had its highest development in the 12th and 13th centenry.(Columbia ElectronicEncyclopedia).Respect is an essential part of chivalry. The code of chivalry is a set of rules followed by the knights during the middle ages. The evolution of heroic and chivalry code has changed over time beginning from the Middle ages to now. The three stories Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Lanval and Beowulf illustrate what it takes to be considered a chivalrous knight.
In the movie A Knight’s Tale the two main knights were William Thatcher and Count Adhemar. They both showed chivalry and courtly love, but not correctly. More of chivalry was followed more and the right way. The movie is very loosely based on Geoffrey Chaucer’s book Canterbury Tales. His father always wanted him the change his stars so he would not live in poor life forever. Even though both knights were good, William was better because he followed chivalry, courtly love, and prowess in battle.
This code of chivalry all came from King Arthur. It all began with Arthur’s father, Uther. Uther gets a sword from the Lady of the Lake and this sword is named Excalibur. Later on in the battle among England, Merlin (the magician) grants Uther his wish in return for whatever he asked for. As for this wish, Uther slept with Egrain’s wife as he asked and impregnated her with his soon to be son, Arthur. When Arthur was born Merlin came for what he was promised, and took Arthur away with him, raising him. What Merlin did know was that Uther’s son was soon to be the new King of England. This soon to be king, Arthur, must become a knight and granted the right to be king. However; there are three examples of chivalry from the two texts, "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight" and "Morte d’Arthur" are courage, honor and to protect the queen and all women.
T.H. White's novel The Once and Future King presents a code of chivalry that outlines the expected knightly behavior of the time. This particular code stresses loyalty to one's liege, love and respect toward women, and absolute devotion to justice. At the height of Arthur's kingdom, this code was widely accepted by all. However, as Arthur's kingdom begins to decline, the code of chivalry begins to hold less importance among the people. The fall of Arthur's kingdom is directly related to the absence of the code of chivalry in the behavior of the Knights of the Round Table. Sir Lancelot betrays Arthur when he has an adulteress affair with Guenever. Sir Lancelot also disrespects women when he leaves Elaine to be with Guenever in Camelot. King Arthur himself is disloyal to justice when he allows Guenever to be rescued by Lancelot.
Romantic gestures have been seen as a useful motive to win hearts of women for centuries. However, as society constantly changes, the effectiveness of these chivalrous acts has diminished. In James Joyce’s “Araby” and John Updike’s “A&P”, this theory is explored, both telling the story of a boy whose efforts to impress the girl of their desires fail. As said by Well’s in his critical analysis of these stories, “Both the protagonists have come to realize that romantic gestures—in fact, that the whole chivalric view [sic] --- are, in modern times, counterproductive”. These stories, despite the differences between the two characters, clearly show that the character’s world is changing, with chivalry becoming more obsolete.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is the story of a knight of Arthur’s round table who unbeknownst to him begins a supernatural game that will test his commitment to the chivalric code. The story written sometime around 1400 is an example of a medieval romance with a noble knight venturing forth to maintain the honor of himself and his court. Knights are supposed to be examples of chivalry and since chivalry is largely based upon the church, these same men must be examples for other Christians. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, while entertaining, also teaches readers one of the hardest lessons of Christianity, that to give into the temptations of this world is the one of the shortest ways to death.
When Maurice Keen set out to write a book on the components and development of chivalry, he did not know it would be “the last word on a seductive subject,” as stated by one Washington Post reviewer. Instead, Keen was merely satisfying a curiosity that derived from a childhood fascination of stories filled with “knights in shining armour.” This juvenile captivation was then transformed into a serious scholarly interest by Keen’s teachers, the product of which is a work based upon literary, artifactual, and academic evidence. Keen’s Chivalry strives to prove that chivalry existed not as a fantastical distraction, as erroneously portrayed by romances, but instead as an integral and functional feature of medieval politics, religion, and society. The thirteen chapters use an exposition format to quietly champion Keen’s opinion of chivalry as being an element of an essentially secular code of “honour” derived from military practices.
Despite its divine origins, the chivalric code is ultimately a human ideal. Chivalry is not a trait naturally found in man, but rather a concept constructed by humanity in its pursuit for Christ-like perfection. It has even been suggested that chivalry is at odds with the nature of man. Despite the weakness of his human nature, however, Sir Gawain is expected to maintain the chivalric code, and he must depend on his faith in God in order to do so. In “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight,” the chivalric code - or rather, the human ability to abide by it - is challenged by nature in a number of different ways.
Many forms of chivalrous code can be found today, from The Cowboy’s Code to the Rules of Courtly Love. These codes are stated with the hope that people will try and follow them to some degree; yet only the perfect could adhere to them all. Considering the fact that such perfection is impossible, the authors merely set out a guideline for honorable behavior. In the context of medieval times, a knight was expected to have faith in his beliefs; for faith was considered to give hope against the despair that human failings create.
Chivalry was a big part of this fourteenth century and it was embodied throughout the men of king Arthurs round table. In General, Chivalry was a set of religious values and moral goals that medieval knights
The epic poem, “The Lay of the Nibelungs” (1200’s), set to practice the major pillars in the code of chivalry that the Duke of Burgundy in the 14th century eventually condensed and ascribed to the Burgundian Knights: Faith, Charity, Justice, Sagacity, Prudence, Temperance, Resolution, Truth, Liberality, Diligence, Hope, and Valor. Though values bear merit, “The Lay of the Nibelungs” teaches that true worth and longevity comes from assessing the situation and applying intellect to the code, from submitting to God, and from not cheating the system (the laws and cultural norms of the time that be).
Closely associated to the romance tradition are two idealized standards of behavior, especially for knights: courage and chivalry. The protagonist within many medieval romances proved their worth by going on quests, as many a knights went in those times, thus returning with great tales of their travels and deeds. Many modern people think of chivalry as referring to a man's gallant treatment of women, and although that sense is derived from the medieval chivalric ideal, chivalry could be seen as more than that. Knights were expected to be brave, loyal, and honorable-sent to protect the weak, be noble to...
In the tale, The Knight’s Tale, Chaucer made sure not to deviate away from what he saw during his time because some qualities emerged as prominent figures. The Knight’s Tale made sure to exemplify the idea of courtly love and what it truly means to be a knight who follows the code of chivalry. Some of the qualities of being chivalrous is being generous, honest, courageous, and supporting the notion of justice, which the readers can see that Chaucer understood the significance of the noble behavior and how that affected people at that time. Furthermore, the article, “The Canterbury Tales for Poetry of Students” highlighted how the noble life of the chivalry was a momentous part of the tale since the tale was “a comment on the possibilities
Chivalry dealt with loyalty honor, and service to women on and off the battle field’ (“The Medieval Period: 1066-1485” 76). The Knight in The Canterbury Tales is the perfect example of someone who follows the code of chivalry. Chaucer describes him with much admiration as “a most distinguishable man, who from the day on which he first began to ride abroad had followed chivalry, truth, honor generousness and courtesy” (Chaucer, "The Prologue." 117). While Chaucer praises the knight for ... ... middle of paper ... ...
In everybody's life, there is something that makes him or her strive for success. That something can be money, a significant other, fame or many other incentives. To the medieval knights, victory renown and glory are the ambitions they strive for. Breaking a law in this code would be considered a disgrace, and would bring a dishonor worse than death itself. However, by applying the Code of Chivalry, the knights in medieval time displayed certain character traits that would secure success and honor in both battle and morality. In the book Ivanhoe, by Sir Walter Scott, a knight named Wilfred of Ivanhoe illustrates this by devoting his attention to keeping the rules of the Code of Chivalry, which consisted of love of adventure, integrity and loyalty to the king, to name just a few. These character traits of Ivanhoe coupled with strong characters and a realistic setting allow the reader to understand the importance of a strong set of moral guidelines to all individuals of all times in spite of Sir Scott's excessive detail and confusing subplot.