Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How marine pollution has had a negative impact on animals, people
Positive impact of human activity on coastal processes
How marine pollution has had a negative impact on animals, people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Chemical Pollutants vs. Marine Mammals
One of the primary ways through which humans have caused significant modifications to the wildlife and their habitat is pollution. Pollution results from changes occurring to the physical and chemical characteristics of the environment leading to a harmful influence on wildlife and can cause deaths or an impairment to their health. Marine ecosystems are subject to chemical pollution from sources such as run-off, sewage, radioactive waste, oil drilling, and inadvertent dumping. Dachs and Mejanelle (2010), authors of “Organic Pollutants in Coastal Waters, Sediments, and Biota: A Relevant Driver for Ecosystems During the Anthropocene?,” state that despite the total number of synthetic chemicals not having
…show more content…
been quantified after their introduction to the environment, they do not range below the thousands. Chemical pollutants are results of manufactured compounds or substances and are not classified as the chemicals that the marine life produce naturally. These pollutants can be classified as oil, toxic metals, or persistent organic pollutants, all of which can lead to protracted health risks to marine life. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are carbon-based chemicals that withstand degradation in water, soil, and air, bioaccumulate in high concentrations, and can be transported long distances through water, air, and migratory animals.
The bioaccumulation of POPs can be transported up a food chain because of their metabolic recalcitrance and their lipophilic efficiency (Fiedler, 2003). Pesticides, industrial chemicals, by-products of industrial processes, polychlorinated biphenyls, toxaphene, and hexachlorobenzene are some of the deleterious POPs that have been banned by the Stockholm Convention. Jones et. al. (1999) and Beland et. al. (1993) study the adverse effects of POPs in marine mammals, observing that the toxic chemicals caused malignant neoplasms, lesions in the digestive systems, pulmonary lesions, cysts on the adrenal glands, reproductive impairment, and damage to the immune system. Similar deleterious health risks are observed in the Northern and Southern Resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) and the Arctic polar bears (Ursus …show more content…
maritimus). Killer whales face multiple conservation threats, including reduced prey abundance, disturbance because of vessels, and high concentrations of toxic chemical pollutants.
Hickie et. al. (2007) express that polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations are some of the highest in killer whales and that risk of the negative health effects is high when factors such as sex, age, calving order, and dietary preferences are considered. The adverse risks of PCBs killer whales can cause changes to their neurological development, reproductive health, immune function, and endocrine endpoints (Hicke et. al., 2007). Hicke et. al. revealed that the affect on the immune system and the endocrine endpoints varies because of the age and sex of the killer whales (2007). It was revealed that concentration of PCBs decreased from juveniles and young adult males to reproductive females and neonates. Due to PCBs being lipophilic, nursing killer whales were observed to be the most contaminated in a span of one year because the PCBs were transmitted from mothers to their calves through the breast milk. The high level of concentrated PCBs in the calves decreased over a span of 15 years as their diets switched from breast milk to a less contaminated fish diet and as their bodies began to grow, increasing their body mass (Hicke et. al., 2007). Hicke et. al. further explained that reproductive females had lower concentrations because they were able to pass down to their offspring through “[the]
reproductive transfer of persistent hydrophobic chemicals” (2007). However, male killer whales had an increased bioaccumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls as they aged because they were unable to eliminate the pollutants.
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is the largest garbage dump in the world. According to estimates made by experts, the patch holds approximately three and a half million tons of garbage. Majority of this garbage is made of plastic. This waste is a threatening problem to the patch’s surrounding wildlife. Many animals are caught in the floating pieces of trash and it is the cause of the deaths of about one million birds and about one hundred thousand other sea animals. Due to the oceans nature and constant moving currents, the trash is also constantly moving. Therefore the size of the patch never stays the exact same. However, scientists believe it be approximately two times the size of Texas. The plastic is mostly broken down from larger materials into small pieces. The patch has been referred to as one scientist as a, “plastic soup”. This garbage poses such a threat mainly because it does not biodegrade. These plastics will be in the ocean essentially forever. Many plastics also contain chemicals, and absorb other chemicals and pollutants they become exposed to. These newly absorbed toxins are then leaked and distributed back into the ocean over time. The chemicals can directly enter the bodies of the animals which consume them. A study was being conducted by scientists of the fish that inhabit the area around the patch. What the researchers found inside the belly of one fish (that was no larger in size than that of a finger), was eighty four small fragments of plastic. It does not take scientists to recognize the impact of this problem, Zach Gold, who is sixteen, is from Santa Monica California. Zach enjoys s...
In 1966, Monsanto managers discovered that fish submerged in that creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds, spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water. They told no one. In 1969, they found fish in another creek with 7,500 times the legal PCB levels. They decided "there is little object in going to expensive extremes in limiting discharges." In 1975, a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats. They ordered its conclusion changed from "slightly tumorigenic" to "does not appear to be carcinogenic."
...et al. (2011). Using fluorescent imaging, the researchers found evidence of abnormal vascularization, neuron branching, and neuromast cell development in zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to the known endocrine disruptor during early life stages. Aluru et al. (2010) determined that maternal exposure to BPA can cause multiple adverse effects on developing offspring. Unfertilized rainbow trout eggs were treated with three different concentrations, fertilized, and resulting juveniles were observed throughout development. Aluru et al. (2010) concluded that oocyte exposure to BPA leads to modified stress performance, delayed hatching times, and growth suppression in juvenile rainbow trout. The following image is taken from Aluru et al. (2010), showing both the decrease in body size and production of yolk observed in juvenile rainbow trout hatched from BPA-exposed oocytes.
A statistic released by the Marine Science Education Project of the Indonesian Ministry of Higher Education States that “…Reefs subject to land-based pollution (sewage, sedimentation, and or industrial pollution) show 30–50% reduced diversity at 3 m, and 40–60% reduced diversity at 10 m depth relative to unpolluted comparison reefs in each region.” This statistic is alarming because it shows just how much pollution can affect a certain environment. Not only does it affect the environment but it also affects animals, plants and people.
Recently, an uninhabited island in the South Pacific Ocean was found to be polluted with 38 million pieces of plastic that had been carried over by currents (Wang, “No one lives on this remote Pacific island”). The island, dubbed ‘trash island’, is home to diverse animal populations that have all been devastated by the pollution. On the beach, hundreds of birds were seen dead by reporters and scientists. When analyzed, the primary cause of death turned out to be consumption of plastic. When animals ingest plastic, it clogs their stomach and poisons their body with toxic chemicals. These toxic chemicals cause an array of issues, such as reproductive and endocrine problems. Eventually, this leads to death (Knoblauch, “The environmental toll of plastics”). But due to the nature of plastics, it can take hundreds or even thousands of years to completely degrade, meaning that as plastic pollution continues to build up, more places like ‘trash island’ will be discovered. According to conservation scientist Alex Bond, “…[The island] is just an indicator of what’s floating around out there” (Wang, “No one lives on this remote Pacific
Ronad A. Hites, Jeffery A. Foran, David O. Carpenter, M. Coreen Hamilton, Barbara A. Knuth, Steven J. Schwager (2004) study: Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon, Science 303:226-229.
Evidence provided to support these claims of human and wildlife harm is largely from laboratory studies in which large doses are fed to test animals, usually rats or mice, and field studies of wildlife species that have been exposed to the chemicals mentioned above. In laboratory studies, high doses are required to give weak hormone activity. These doses are not likely to be encountered in the environment. However the process of bioaccumulation can result in top-level predators such as humans to have contaminants at levels many million times greater than the environmental background levels (Guilette 1994). In field studies, toxicity caused by endocrine disruption has been associated with the presence of certain pollutants. Findings from such studies include: reproductive disruption in starfish due to PCBs, bird eggshell thinning due to DDT, reproductive failure in mink, small penises in alligators due to DDT and dicofol (Guillette 1994, Colburn et al 1996). In addition, a variety of reproductive problems in many other species are claimed to be associated with environmental contamination although the specific causative agents have not been determined. One recent discovery that complicates the situation is that there are many naturally occurring "phytoestrogens", or chemicals of plant origin that exhibit weak estrogenic properties.
Concerns about contamination found in fish can pose a threat to its consumers and put their outcomes at risk. Fish are known to contain the chemicals mercury, dioxins, and PCBS that can be harmful to individuals. These chemicals may build up in a person’s body after years of eating highly contaminated fish that can result to one’s health concern. “In America one-in-six children born every year have been exposed to mercury levels so high that they are potentially at risk for learning disabilities and motor skill impairment and short-term memory loss” (“Mercury in”). This statistic shows that inf...
"Ocean Pollution." MarineBio Conservation Society ~ Marine Biology, Ocean Life Conservation, Sea Creatures, Biodiversity, Research... Web. 19 May 2014.
Every time we throw away a plastic bottle, drive our cars, and even burn those millions of fossil fuels to operate all those huge factories, there is a chance it will pollute the ocean and eventually affect the way we live. There should be stricter laws regulating human pollution, in order to protect our ocean ecosystem. The ocean is an abundant source of life. It is home to thousands of different creatures, provides a great source of food, and provides the earth with about one half of the oxygen needed to sustain life. National Geographic: Pollution, especially plastic, is a catastrophic problem.
Research from the University of California San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography said that species in the ocean consume a projected 12,000 to 24,000 tons of plastic every year in the Pacific Ocean (Nall, 2014). Pollution of recyclable materials in the oceans is one of the leading causes of why some marine species are nearing extinction. Many authors of articles and books analyzing this topic tend to agree that pollution of our oceans is a problem. The future of this problem is where their ideas tend to differ. The following four literature reviews attempt to demonstrate and support my belief that pollution is getting worse in the ocean and more marine life ecosystems are being affected, but there are things that we as humans can do to change this. Imagine a world where we didn’t have to constantly worry about the vicious cycle of humans affecting animals and then animals in turn affecting us through consumption.
According to World WildLife Fund, many ecosystems around the world are being destroyed, eliminating many plant and animal species that inhabit them (“Pollution”).
Did you know that more than 90 percent of all organisms that have ever lived on Earth are extinct? According to Pandey, the author of Humans Pushing Marine Life toward ‘Major Extinction’, nearly 10,000 species go extinct each year, and this rate is estimated to be 1,000 times higher than the natural extinction rate (1). Human beings are causing irreversible damage to the oceans and their wildlife, which is being led by two major reasons: Commercial fishing or over-fishing, which damaged the marine environment and caused a loss in the marine life diversity, and pollution, which is a primary way of the extinction causes that drastically modifies the marine life habitat. As a result of the commercial fishing and pollution, many of the marine species will start disappearing of the oceans. Briggs emphasizes that over-fishing “has induced population collapses in many species. So instead of having less than a hundred species at risk, as was the case some 30-40 years ago, there are now a thousand or more (10).”
Efforts to improve the standard of living for humans--through the control of nature and the development of new products--have also resulted in the pollution, or contamination, of the environment. Much of the world's air, water, and land is now partially poisoned by chemical wastes. Some places have become uninhabitable. This pollution exposes people all around the globe to new risks from disease. Many species of plants and animals have become endangered or are now extinct. As a result of these developments, governments have passed laws to limit or reverse the threat of environmental pollution.
Unfortunately, we live in a world were pollution and death occurs a lot in our Marine life. The Marine life is scarce and abundant, were there is no possible way to survive. There once was a time when we didn’t have to worry about pollution. We didn’t know the effect it had on our marine life. It eventually became a habit and it couldn't be stopped. According to Emily Gertz, “Tens of thousands of individual animals from hundreds of Marine species—including every kind of sea turtle and around half of marine mammals-have encountered plastic, glass, and other garbage in the ocean” (Gertz).