Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the food industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the food industry
When someone thinks about the food industry 100 years ago, they might think of workers getting stuck in crazy unsafe machines, and not receiving any workers comp, or anything. They might think of immigrants flooding the industry with reduced pay. They might even think about animals trapped in horrible living quarters. Well, when they think about the present, the same thoughts might not pop into their minds, but in fact, the food industry has not changed. Workers are still treated poorly, animals are treated lousy and their main priority is to make cheap products.
Food workers are treated poorly. In, The Jungle, while talking about the food industry, it states, “The great corporation which employed you lied to you, and lied to the whole country—from
…show more content…
top to bottom it was nothing but one gigantic lie” (Sinclair 112). In other words, these industries don’t care about their workers at all. In, “The Most Dangerous Job”, it states, “Despite the fact Kenny had been with the company for almost sixteen years… Kenny learned that he’d been fired” (Schlosser 165). This also showed that this company did not care for its workers. These workers, past and present, did not receive respect from their workplace which meant they were treated very poorly. Since both of these stories showcased a different time frame, but similar scenarios, then the food industry must not have changed. The Animals were also treated lousy. In, The Jungle, Jurgis was describing the factory, “They use everything about the hog except the squeal” (Sinclair 72). Using every part of a pig is disgusting on its own, but the squealing means the pig is suffering. In, Food Inc., the living conditions were also being described, “The cows were knee deep in manure, stuffed right next to each other” (Kenner). These cows were forced to live in horrible living conditions, that no human could even imagine having to live. From suffering, to horrible living conditions, animals were treated poorly in the past and now. Although there are some slight differences, the food industry hasn’t changed how they deal with animals. One argument that one might make towards the food industry actually changing, is that food got cheaper.
An example of this is in Food, Inc., when a struggling family says, the only way we’d be able to survive is because of cheap food (Kenner). Yes, cheap food does prevent them from starving, but at what cost? This is coming from an obviously obese family, so this cheap food, that is “saving” them, is also slowly killing them. Expensive food is expensive because people actually took time to create it. Cheap food usually comes from huge companies trying to create as much product while doing the least amount of work as …show more content…
possible. Like stated before, companies want to produce cheap product.
In, The Jungle, it says, “The rich people not only had all the money, they had all the chance to get more; they had all the knowledge and the power, and so the poor man was down, and he had to stay down” (Sinclair 94). These rich company owners pay their workers nothing even though they have money to spare. In Food, Inc., the same obese family from before says, we don’t eat fast food because we want to, we eat it because that’s all we can afford (Kenner). This also supports the previous claim, but this family realizes the predicament that they’re in. They work for a food industry, and they get payed so little, they are forced to eat the crap they produce. Big companies are just recycling the money they pay to their workers by forcing them to consume their product. Since both instances have workers with excessively poor pay, it proves that then and now, companies are trying to get produce products as cheaply as
possible. If one looks back 100 years at how food is produced, they wouldn’t see much of a difference from how it’s produced today. Aside from some technology changes, the food industry stayed fairly the same, and also remained extremely inhumane. Then and now, workers were treated poorly, animals were treated lousy and they focussed on creating products as cheaply as possible. From animals living in their own feces, to workers being forced to eat the horrible food they create, it is apparent that this is true. Although the food industry hasn’t changed in the past 100 years, that doesn’t mean it still won’t. The consumer world is very susceptible to change now-a-days. If people start eating more healthy, like eating organic foods, locally grown foods and foods low in unhealthy substances, then stores will start producing more of that food making it cheaper. Although it may be difficult, if people boycott fast food and other junk foods, then they will go out of business creating space for those healthy foods. It is possible to have a good food industry, it just requires a little work.
In the book Fast Food Nation, Eric Schlosser talks about the working conditions of fast food meat slaughterhouses. In the chapter “The Most Dangerous Job,” one of the workers, who despised his job, gave Schlosser an opportunity to walk through a slaughterhouse. As the author was progressed backwards through the slaughterhouse, he noticed how all the workers were sitting very close to each other with steel protective vests and knives. The workers were mainly young Latina women, who worked swiftly, accurately, while trying not to fall behind. Eric Schlosser explains how working in the slaughterhouses is the most dangerous profession – these poor working conditions and horrible treatment of employees in the plants are beyond comprehension to what we see in modern everyday jobs, a lifestyle most of us take for granted.
With regulations being set and laws enacted, the United States has seen a change for the better within the food industry and for the consumers overall. As a result, as much as a company is willing to cut on cost, without the consumers, every business in any industry will become bankrupt. The power is in the consumer and as long as consumers are educated properly and willing to speak up, there is a bright future ahead. However, because not everything can be seen, it is important to have books such as The Jungle and authors like Upton Sinclair to let people know what is going on and what not everyone is able to see. In doing so, this will raise awareness, create transparency and demand that companies practice ethically for the betterment of the
Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle,” gave the most in-depth description of the horrid truths about the way America’s food companies, “the only source of food for people living in the city,” are preparing the food they sell. “The Jungle” describes the terrible
Regulating what the government should control and what they should not was one of the main arguments our founding fathers had to deal with when creating our nation, and to this day this regulation is one of the biggest issues in society. Yet, I doubt our founding fathers thought about the idea that the food industry could one day somewhat control our government, which is what we are now facing. Marion Nestles’ arguments in the book Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health deal with how large food companies and government intertwine with one another. She uses many logical appeals and credible sources to make the audience understand the problem with this intermingling. In The Politics of Food author Geoffrey Cannon further discusses this fault but with more emotional appeals, by use of personal narratives. Together these writers make it dramatically understandable why this combination of the food industry and politics is such a lethal ordeal. However, in The Food Lobbyists, Harold D. Guither makes a different viewpoint on the food industry/government argument. In his text Guither speaks from a median unbiased standpoint, which allows the reader to determine his or her own opinions of the food industries impact on government, and vise versa.
...struggling to earn any income at all and sometimes do not even get the opportunity to eat. Another issue that Raj Patel did not touch on is the lack of care consumers have for the farmers. It seems that consumers care about farmers about as much as the corporations do, which, in my opinion, is not a lot. When consumers only care about low prices and large corporations only care about making a profit, the farmers are left out to dry. Many consumers believe “food should be available at a bargain price, a belief that relies on labor exploitation and environmental exhaustion at multiple points along the commodity chain.” (Wright, 95) Corporations as well as consumers generally tend to be selfish and I think Raj Patel is afraid to mention this. If only these people cared a little bit more about each other I believe the hourglass of the food system will begin to even out.
Employment is hard to find and hard to keep and a job isn’t always what one hoped for. Sometimes jobs do not sufficiently support our lifestyles, and all too frequently we’re convinced that our boss’s real job is to make us miserable. However, every now and then there are reprieves such as company holiday parties or bonuses, raises, promotions and even a half hour or hour to eat lunch that allows escape from monotonous workloads. Aside from our complaints, employment today for majority of American’s isn’t totally dreadful, and there always lies opportunity for promotion. American’s did not always experience this reality in their work places though, and not long past are days of abysmal and disgusting work conditions. In 1906 Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” was published. His novel drastically transformed the way Americans felt about the unmitigated power corporations wielded in the ‘free’ market economy that was heavily propagandized at the turn of the century. Corporations do not have the same unscrupulous practices today because of actions taken by former President Theodore Roosevelt who felt deeply impacted by Sinclair’s famous novel. Back in early 1900’s in the meatpacking plants of Chicago the incarnation of greed ruled over the working man and dictated his role as a simple cog within an enormous insatiable industrial machine. Executives of the 1900’s meatpacking industry in Chicago, IL, conspired to work men to death, obliterate worker’s unions and lie to American citizens about what they were actually consuming in order to simply acquire more money.
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
In conclusion, The Jungle offered a detailed insight to the working conditions and highly unsanitary processing methods in the meat packing industry. Although he failed to successfully promote Socialism, the book has been widely successful, mainly for the horrid descriptions and images of working in the plant. It will continue to be a memorable novel for history enthusiasts alike, and a captivating story to portray life of a working class citizen during the Progressive Era.
The mother of the family has twenty-five dollars in her checking bank account, her kids haven’t had healthy nutritious food for a while and her husband, if he gets a lower-paying job, the family’s financial position will become more precarious. He juxtaposes the condition of this family with that of a guy who owns a pillow making business. The guy makes more than enough money to live an opulent life (more than $10 million and less than $30 million) – the amount of money he makes could feed several families like the one portrayed in the movie. A CEO makes 475 times the money an average worker makes in America. The people working for federal minimum wage ($7.25) barely make enough to fulfill their basic needs – the government has failed to set up a wage limit that could make someone’s life livable, without causing deprivation of basic
In this film, “Food Inc” they are showing us how the food industry grew into these mega processing plants, and slaughterhouses. First, let us look at the market force; the definition of a market force is the law of supply and demand. This means basically the price determination within the market; moreover, the price is determined by the level of demand and the quantity that is available. In the Tar Heel Slaughter house in Smithfield, is the largest slaughter house in the world. On the “kill floor”, they kill at least 32,000 a day. This makes meat packing one of the most dangerous jobs. The food system and the few companies that control the meat production industry have turned the food
Decades later, and even in a new age of American “freedom” and “opportunities,” not much has really changed. In the American food industry, the presence of an oppressive class system is very rampant; hidden from view, but influential as ever. Because the way the food reaches our plates straight from the stores makes it seem like a simple method of growing and transporting, the complex system, or system of systems, is very much hidden behind a wall of what it seems to be. Citizens fail to realize that in this food supply chain, everyone plays a vital role, whether directly or passively contributing to the system. In 1880, roughly “80% of Americans worked in agriculture toiling to feed themselves and others,” which is now reduced to 2% of Americans
According to Marge Dwyer, “The researchers found that healthier diet patterns—for example, diets rich in fruits, vegetables, fish, and nuts—cost significantly more than unhealthy diets (for example, those rich in processed foods, meats, and refined grains). On average, a day’s worth of the most healthy diet patterns cost about $1.50 more per day than the least healthy ones. The researchers suggested that unhealthy diets may cost less because food policies have focused on the production of “inexpensive, high volume” commodities” (hsph.harvard.edu). This shows that why people choose to eat fast food instead of buying all the ingredient when you have no time and cost more. People do not care what food they eat since it is cheap and
It has been estimated that one out of eight workers at some point of their career worked at McDonald's. Today there are approximately 3.5 million fast food workers and they constitute the largest group of the minimum wage earners in the country. According to Schlosser, "the only Americans who consistently earn a lower hourly wage are migrant farm workers ." "Fast Food Nation" is the story of the postwar America. Fast food industry has pushed the homogenization of our society. The author is very convincing in making his arguments and supports them with a wide variety of examples. It is impossible to disagree with what he is saying because the evidence in support to his statements is around us.
American culture is changing dramatically. In some areas it’s a good thing, but in other areas, like our food culture, it can have negative affects. It is almost as if our eating habits are devolving, from a moral and traditional point of view. The great America, the land of the free and brave. The land of great things and being successful, “living the good life.” These attributes highlight some irony, especially in our food culture. Is the American food culture successful? Does it coincide with “good living”? What about fast and processed foods? These industries are flourishing today, making record sales all over the globe. People keep going back for more, time after time. Why? The answer is interestingly simple. Time, or in other words, efficiency. As people are so caught up in their jobs, schooling, sports, or whatever it may be, the fast/processed food industries are rapidly taking over the American food culture, giving people the choice of hot
Agriculture has changed dramatically, especially since the end of World War II. Food and fibre productivity rose due to new technologies, mechanization, increased chemical use, specialization and government policies that favoured maximizing production. These changes allowed fewer farmers with reduced labour demands to produce the majority of the food and fibre.