Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parental involvement in education
Parental involvement in education
Parental involvement in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Charter schools are unique. They are open to any student who wishes to attend. Unlike traditional public schools, they are held accountable for achieving educational results or their school will be shut down. So they don’t have bureaucratic rules and many of the restrictions that other public schools have to deal with. It is a public school that is independently run and is granted flexibility in its operations. Charter schools are governed by each local community. The local community usually includes teachers and parents. As public schools, they are the only schools that allow parents or community groups to reinvent the public school system. For the majority of parents, they want a positive atmosphere that will encourage their child’s …show more content…
growth. The child’s emotional and intellectual growth is very important to a parent. They want them to be able to learn what is necessary to live and survive in this world. Parents want to be involved in children’s education, but the majority of them are not familiar with what their children should be learning. But charter schools are different because teachers work with parents and in turn it helps them learn more about what children should be learning. Charter school allows them to be more engaged in their child’s education. Parents that want to achieve these education aspirations for their children should look into charter schools to fill their educational goals. Unlike traditional public schools, charter schools provide alternatives.
Charter schools improve education by offering students more creative approaches to learning and by giving parents more choices. In states with charter laws, students don’t have to go to their assigned school in their local school district and can enroll in any charter school. That means a student is not stuck in their zone school. They allow students from any other area the ability to enroll, but not everyone gets in because there is only a limited amount of seats. Since charter schools are granted more flexibility, they can develop more innovative programs. Effective school leadership, which includes instructional leadership, team goal-setting and distributed leadership, is one of the most important factors influencing teacher behavior and student outcomes (Wei, Patel, and Young 5). So the teachers are free to try different ways of thinking outside the box to help students learn and achieve at higher levels. Most charter schools are small in size where they know and care about each …show more content…
other. American students aren’t developing skills like students in other countries. Their science, math and language skills are lacking and is sad to hear, but is the current reality. When American students were being compared to students from around the world, it was disappointing because students are not doing as well as they should be in their level of class. While U.S. schools struggled to reach even an average score on a key international exam for 15 year olds in 2012, BASIS Tucson North, an economically modest, ethnically diverse charter school in Arizona, outperformed every country in the world, and left even Shanghai, China’s academic gem in the dust (Kronholz). The problem is the United States public school system and the problem has nothing to do with the students because they’re just like any of those students in different countries. The public schools are obviously not doing their job and the students are the one that is suffering. Our students need the skills and knowledge to be competitive in this world. Without the passionate, knowledgeable and persistent teachers to teach the students, their future will consist of low paying jobs. So which school a student goes to will make all the difference. The best United State schools are the ones that implement innovative programs. Some charter schools do very well. On average, they do better at educating poor students from low income families. Low income student usually does poorer than other students. There is a group called The Houston YES Prep Public Schools, and they are a group of ten public charter schools. They work mainly with students from low income families. Teachers there pay special attention to students that are struggling and works with them so the students don’t have a chance to fall behind. Charter schools helped English language learners and poverty students achieve more than traditional public school. Educators at these charter schools can work effectively on educating English language learners because of the level of self governing given to them. In public school everything is usually taught in English, but the educator in the charter school uses native language instruction programs to assist the students in learning. Among charter schools adding new campuses, the percentage of incoming students whose first language is not English shot up from just under 30 percent two years ago to 55 percent in 2013 (Peyser). The English language learners are growing and will continually grow in the United States. Without a doubt, English language learners make up a good percentage in charter schools. They may excel in one area and need lots of support in another. With that population growth there needs to be a huge emphasis on improving learning for these English language learners. Charter schools serve students better than public schools because charter schools have a lot to offer.
They are better in areas such as quality of teaching, academic standards, extra help for students, individual attention from teachers, discipline and accessibility. Parents have the option of choosing whichever school they want and don’t have to be restricted to a school. I have friends that don’t want to bring their children to their local school but have no other choice than to bring them. Also, many of them have special interest classes. This allows students a choice to choose classes such as the performing arts that will help offer new insights with their career choice. Charter schools are something that parents definitely should consider when choosing schools if they are not happy with where their children is at. They are excellent schools that provide unique learning environment that would benefit their child. In the documentary “The Lottery”, Geoffrey Canada said “You get charter for 5 years. One of the great things about charter school is that it is totally accountable. If you don’t own a decent school, you will not get your charter renewed and essentially your school will be closed.” From listening to what he said in the documentary we know that ineffective schools will be closed and good charter schools with improved achievement will stay open and continue to
grow.
Zimmer, R. and Buddin, R. (2009), Is Charter School Competition in California Improving the Performance of Traditional Public Schools?. Public Administration Review, 69: 831–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02033.x
Charter Schools are best known for combining traits and features of both public and private schools. Charters schools are not restricted to many of the rules and policies put on other public schools (Gale 1). For example teachers are given more free reign in charters, and they are not expected to stick to a certain curriculum. Because there is no specific criteria in place for teachers of charter schools, pay scales do not have to be followed for teachers and administrators. Also, charters are publically funded and have specialized accountability for producing certain results.
Leading organizations of school administrators offer educators various opportunities to encourage educators to become leaders. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has mandated that leaders be better prepared for the task of providing quality education to all. NCLB “… is forcing all educational stakeholders to face the weakness of contemporary school leadership and is making it impossible to ignore the need for higher quality principals” (Hale & Moorman, 2003, p.1). It is believed that all educators can be and are leaders in their own right. A leader is a visionary and has the ability to inspire others to aspire to greatness. Of the numerous opportunities that are offered, those that are most beneficial include but are not limited to leadership training programs, professional development, and creating shared leadership opportunities for teachers to become leaders. The systems “…that produce our nation’s principals are complex and interrelated – and governed by the states. Each state establishes licensing, certification and re-certification” (Hale & Moorman, 2003, p.1). States use the ISLLC standards “…as the framework for preparation programs and in service professional development of school superintendents, principals, and other leaders” (Hale & Moorman, 2003, p.3).
According to Edie (2012), “Charter schools are public schools because they operate independently of the school district” (Edie , 2012, p.1). Charter schools were developed because of the struggle of educational needs of public schools in educating students. They Charter schools are designed to be free to set their own operating hours and curriculum. They also strive to boost student achievement by giving students more time in the classroom, and also can offer classes in the evening, weekends, and into the summer months. Most charter schools feature smaller class sizes and dedicated teachers who want to make a difference, so students receive a lot of individual attention. Charter schools are held accountable for meeting and exceeding state and district academic achievement targets...
In a nation dominated by capitalism and free trade, steps are being taken to turn the ability to learn and other education rights into commodities that can be manipulated and controlled by companies. Charter schools are public schools funded by state money, but not unionized; they also can be in the form of a traditional brick and mortar schoolhouse or an online school (Ravitch)(Molnar)(“Preface to 'Are Charter and Magnet Schools Good Alternatives for Students?’”). According to their proponents, charter schools allow parents more sway over their child’s education (Jacoby 77). A charter school proponent Jeff Jacoby states, “Their goal: to build the kind of school that used to be commonplace in America-one providing a rigorous, traditional, fact-based
Charter schools are public schools, but can be a better option than traditional public schools for some students. By definition, a charter school is a publicly funded and privately run school under the charter of an educational authority. (2-4) A charter school is held to a different set of standards than most traditional public schools. This can often work towards their advantage because it allows them to try new and unique methods of educating children. And the education system could use some fresh ideas.
Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon school districts. Charter schools are accountable for academic results and upholding the promises made in their charters.
The issue of whether charter or public schools are more beneficial for students has been an ongoing debate. The question that arise is which type provides a better education. Having gone to a charter high school myself, I got to see and experience first-hand the benefits of going to a charter school as well as realizing the issues charter schools face here in Oklahoma. These problems need to address in order to guarantee that students are getting the best education that they can get. We are facing an epidemic today with our education system and charter schools could be the solution. There may be opponents to the idea of having charter schools, but they have been wildly successful lately and are quickly expanded throughout the states. This is due to the fact that charter schools can benefit people economically, educationally, and as well as socially.
The biggest difference between charter schools and public schools is that the charter schools have their own operating system, foundation and teachers. (Ravitch, Reign of Error, chapter 16, p157-160) There also are some disadvantages in charter schools, first is the quality gap, due to the quality of teaching which almost depends on teachers and principals. The second one is differentiation between races and classes. Some charter schools’ mission is to serve minorities, such as African-Americans and Hispanics, because they want to save the nations’ culture.
The first article studied only one leadership style, transformational leadership, while the second article compared both transformational and transactional leadership. The third article, while not comparing leadership styles, provided research into what entices parents and students to choose charter ran schools over schools in the public domain.
One of the more recent policy issues that has arisen in Florida is the amount of funding that Charter school should receive from the state. There are those on the Republican side that believe that they should fund Charter schools equally to how they fund public schools. Raplh Arza, who is a Republican legislator and a lobbyist for charter schools believe that it is discriminatory if the state does not fund both tradition public school and charter schools. He said, “lawmakers shouldn’t discriminate against kids because their parents choose an alternative to traditional public schools and it would be unfair to give traditional schools more money, even though they still vastly outnumber charter schools” (Clark, 2016). On the flip side Joanne McCall,
In actuality, most studies comparing charter schools to other public schools have had inconclusive results. Plus, charter schools can vet for better test takers as their students. Charter schools are a boon to the education system, sucking federal dollars away from state schools. If they are not screening for the students they want. They are under supplying their students and staff for more profit. Education is the architect of change. The education you have will influence the change you make. Everyone deserves an excellent education, and frankly charter schools do not reliably provide that. Therefore they should be fixed or eliminated. Stand up for a good education, stand up for change, and fight back against the the problem that is charter
For some parents, deciding on a school for their children can be a difficult decision. Many parents do not spend much time thinking about it; they place their children into the local school designated by where they live. Others attended a private school themselves and found that it was a beneficial experience and therefore want the same for their kids. But which is better: private schools or public schools? While there are many advantages and disadvantages in each (nothing is going to be absolutely perfect), we are going to focus on the benefits of an education in the public school system, or in other words, schools funded by the government that are for anyone to attend. An accurate definition found in the Encyclopedia of American Education (1996) states: “Any elementary or secondary school under control of elected or appointed civil authority, supported entirely by public tax monies, and, with few exceptions, open to all students in a designated district, free of any tuition charges.” (780) These include elementary, secondary schools and vocational schools. Public schools are a good choice in education because they provide a wide variety of subjects to study, are diverse in their student body, available to everyone, yet can sometimes be misunderstood.
Prior to this field experience, I had no previous interaction with charter schools so I did not know what to expect or if I would even like it. However, I came to find that School Lanes environment is the exact environment I hope to be in when I become a certified teacher. They call their school environment a “sanctuary” to shield them from the hardships of the outside world. School Lane is a place that considers all children to be gifted and because of this, expectations for the students are high. Their motto is, “what you achieve today is directly related to what you do”.
I think private school are better and have more advantages than public school. There are upsides and downsides for both schools. Private schools have newer facilities and other materials. The benefits of private school for the students are that they have smaller class sizes and better teacher ratios from the students. Private have a high standards for discipline and respect to one another. Seventy two percent of parents agreed to send their kids to private school, because it has greatly improved students’performance and brighter experience and achievements in there harder lessons (Maga 2). Students will also have more individual attention. Students are motivated by the teachers to help in their studies. Parents would also have more opportunities to get involved with their kid’s education and that is very good thing. Private have flexible teaching methods for the students to do better. There are many advantages for the students (Elizabeth 1). Let’s talk about disadvantages. Their goal is to offer better education without making a profit (Amy Witherbee 2). Private school charge tuitions and that sound n...