Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do charter schools compare to public
Essays on how charter schools are better than public schools
Essays on how charter schools are better than public schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How do charter schools compare to public
Charter schools represent the most pervasive and accepted educational policy reform to promote community driven learning. In order to understand how this learning can be promoted, however, it is important to first understand how charter school laws differ from those of public schools. America’s public school system is one that is focused on creating uniformity amongst its schools, and this is accomplished by establishing a number or rules and regulations designed to limit school autonomy and decision-making flexibility. Some of these obstacles include “intrusive elected school boards, stringent teacher certification requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and rules regarding curriculum and other facets of school activities” (JSTOR). …show more content…
No other goal, including academic achievement, is mentioned more often (Bulkley). These schools recognize the fact that the current “one-size fits all” public school system is failing at providing students, especially those of poverty, the opportunity to learn and have scholastic achievement and success. They realize that simply “throwing money” at a problem of this magnitude does not promote change, and they understand that their freedom from the current bureaucratic system provides them with an opportunity to address this problem at the source, and develop specific innovative solutions that can have a direct impact on student learning and achievement. As previously discussed, charter schools can utilize this increased freedom and innovation in a variety of ways, but the most importantly, they can use it to develop a school that is designed and tailored for their specific community and group of students. There are nearly 6,000 charter schools nationwide (nscl.org), and nearly every single one of them looks completely different from the next. For instance, some schools run six days a week, some double up instruction in core subject areas like math or reading, some have mandatory after school programs focused on character development, some have incredibly harsh punishments …show more content…
Nearly everyone can think back to their prior education experience and recognize the significant influence that effective teachers have had on their learning and personal growth. For most, these exceptional teachers had the ability to transform the school experience, which is often described as being “boring” or “irrelevant,” into one of interest and excitement. No matter how this transformation took place, however, we can all intuitively conclude that these special teachers both enriched our lives, and enriched our ability to learn and achieve in academic settings over the course of many years. Unsurprisingly, these intuitive conclusions are also backed by empirical research. One study, conducted by the University of Tennessee’s Value-Added and Assessment Center, found that when students are placed with three high-performing teachers in a row, beginning in the 3rd grade, “they scored on average in the 96th percentile on Tennessee’s statewide mathematics assessment at the end of 5th grade” (study). Comparatively, those students who were placed with three low-performing teachers in a row scored in only the 44th percentile on the same statewide assessment
In 2010, Charlotte Danielson wrote an article, “Evaluations That Help Teachers”, for the magazine The Effective Educator. The purpose of this article was to explain how a teacher evaluation system, such as her own Framework for Teaching, should and can actually foster teacher learning rather than just measure teacher competence, which is what most other teacher evaluation systems do. This topic is especially critical to decision-making school leaders. Many of the popular teacher evaluation systems fail to help schools link teacher performance with meaningful opportunities for the teachers to reflect on and learn from in order to grow professionally. With the increased attention on the need for more rigorous student standards, this then is an enormous opportunity missed. Students can only achieve such rigorous expectations if their teachers can effectively teach them, and research has shown that teachers who are evaluated by systems that hold them to accountability and provide them for continuous support and growth will actually teach more effectively.
Wilson, Steven F., and Research American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy. Success At Scale In Charter Schooling. Education Outlook. No. 3. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2009. ERIC. Web. 11 Nov. 2011.
One of the most pressing issues facing the United States today is its failing educational system. While many solutions have been proposed, the idea of charter schools has been both popular and controversial. The topic of charter schools is being debated in as many places as local school board meetings to state supreme courts. Though on the surface, charter schools seem like an exciting and promising step for the future of education in America, they are not the answer to this country’s ever-increasing educational problems. Charters will drain already scarce funding from regular public schools, and many of the supposed “positives” surrounding them are uncertain and unpredictable at best.
Introduction Teachers have become gateway keepers to providing education to students. Over the span of several years, teachers have been criticized for being unprepared, unable to adapt to different learning styles, and are increasing the number of students who aren’t learning. With this achievement gap increasing, it brings up the idea of what the education system is doing wrong and what improvements it needs to make. The education system needs to be redesigned to strengthen its curriculum, it’s connection to both practice and theory, and the idea of a powerful educator. The first aspect of this memo contains an interview with Diana Regalado De Santiago, a math teacher in the Socorro Independent School District for the past six years.
Arguments For: Allows individuals or groups with innovative educational ideas to put them into practice without being unduly hampered by local or state bureaucracy. These schools may have unconventional hours, experiment with curricula, specialize in certain types of teaching or design programs tailored to a particular audience or community. Charter schools can introduce the ingredient of a measure of needed competition to the public schools. They may provide for more accountability because schools that work will be rewarded and those that do not will be changed or even closed.
...flexibility to meet the needs of today's families while being held accountable for improving student achievement. Charter schools are the best choice for a child’s education.
Charter schools are gaining more support every year. President Obama said: “These learning laboratories give educators the chance to try new models and methods. That can encourage excellence in the classroom and prepare more of our children for college and careers,” during his Presidential Proclamation of National Charter Schools Week. But this kind of education doesn’t have the same sort of support from everyone. There is negativity that...
“Many charter schools segregate students along the racial and class lines and that they may also tend to lack services for students with disabilities or limited English proficiency, which leads to less diversity in Charter schools. Charter schools have their own school boards and are typically free to experiment with instructional and disciplinary methods, Charter schools are privately run by boards that are appointed by charter organizations rather the public which means less local accountability and
Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon school districts. Charter schools are accountable for academic results and upholding the promises made in their charters.
The issue of whether charter or public schools are more beneficial for students has been an ongoing debate. The question that arise is which type provides a better education. Having gone to a charter high school myself, I got to see and experience first-hand the benefits of going to a charter school as well as realizing the issues charter schools face here in Oklahoma. These problems need to address in order to guarantee that students are getting the best education that they can get. We are facing an epidemic today with our education system and charter schools could be the solution. There may be opponents to the idea of having charter schools, but they have been wildly successful lately and are quickly expanded throughout the states. This is due to the fact that charter schools can benefit people economically, educationally, and as well as socially.
Although about 2 million American students now attend around 5,600 charter schools, I do not think this as beneficial to American students as charter school proponents claim. Despite all of the “perks” charters schools boast of and attract parents with, these schools do not necessarily perform better than average schools. Charter schools give an unfair advantage to stronger students, leaving students who struggle in weaker schools with fewer resources to help them. Perhaps most importantly, they are not available to all students, even though they are funded by public tax dollars. Although the motivations behind charter schools are admirable, they are not worth it. Our efforts in improving education are better spent investing in the public schools we already have.
Russell believes that charter schools are necessary to provide quality education to students who do not have access to satisfactory public schools. Thus, Karp places greater importance on the democratic mission of public education. In accordance with the democratic mission of public education, the existence of charter schools impairs equal access and opportunity. According to Russell, charter schools do not impair equal access and opportunity because they exist as an alternative for students and families who are dissatisfied with their public schools. Therefore, their shared value of quality education does not lead to any points of agreement between them. Rather, they look to different solutions to solve educational
Everyone knows that when it comes to making a difference in a child’s academic and life achievements, their teachers play a large role. A teacher’s ability to relate to their students, and teach them to achieve both socially and academically contributes to how effective they are. What does it mean to be an effective teacher? Overall there seems to be an emphasis on teacher effectiveness related to how well their students are performing on standardized testing. As teachers we know there is more to being an effective teacher then just teaching our students based on tests. This paper will identify different definitions of an effective teacher along with how to assess teachers on being effective.
The state’s new evaluation system was in response to administrators who produced, “superficial and capricious teacher evaluation systems that often don't even directly address the quality of instruction, much less measure students' learning” (Toch, 2008). Too often, the “good-ol-boy” attitude would insure mediocre educators would remain employed. Realizing this was often more the rule then the exception, the governor created educational mandates to focus, “on supporting and training effective teachers to drive student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013). Initially, they expected the school districts and the teachers would have issues and experience growing pains, but in the end the goal was, “to improve teacher performance, year by year, with a corresponding rise in student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013).
With the proper guidance and support, teachers can achieve academic excellence in the classroom. They follow their principal’s vision and share their goals. Teachers also serve as leaders in their classroom. They share their vision and goals with their students promoting positive attitudes in the classroom. Just like it is important for principals to respect and understand what their teachers need, students also need the support, understanding, respect and empathy from their teachers. When teachers demonstrate commitment in the classroom and set high expectations they raise the level of learning in the classroom. Teachers that work with the students and their parents to understand and meet their needs will achieve positive academic outcomes. Students engage in learning with positive attitudes and strive for high achievements. Teachers work together with their leaders to improve their teaching