Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charlemagne life of charlemagne
Short note about crusades
Charlemagne life of charlemagne
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Charlemagne life of charlemagne
Charlemagne vs The Barbarians Was it ethical for Charlemagne to force the barbarians to become Christians by killing pagan people who refuse to convert? According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary ethical is following something that is morally right or good. I believe Charlemagne’s actions were ethical because the Middle Ages was a time of violence, hatred, and darkness. First, the barbarians were a pagan group spread across Germany and Central of Europe. They were dangerous and violent group of people. Charlemagne wanted them to stop destroying his city and stealing all the food from his people. It took Charlemagne thirty-two years to conquer the barbarians, and under his ruled the barbarians would have protection, food, and shelter. The
In the Frankish empire, there were numerous different cultures which inhabited it. A cultural dividing line can be draw down the Rhine River. On the left bank of the Rhine, you had the lands of Christian, Romanised Gaul, while on the right bank of the Rhine resided pagan Germania.* Culturally, linguistically and religiously, these two cultures could not have been more different from each other. In Gaul, the people had become Romanised and Christianised over the centuries by their roman overlords. Gaul was also heavily settled by the Franks, since they were feodrati for Rome. When the Western Roman Empire fell, it was easy for the Franks to move in and assume control over the territory. With the Franks conversion to Christianity in 496 The Franks were able to mix well with the Gallo-Roman land owners and peasants, leading Gaul to slowly transform itself into Francia.* The coronation of Charlemagne further enhanced his authority over his Gallic dominions by linking himself with the old Western Roman Empire.* This allowed him to be seen as a legitimate successor to the emperors of old, instead of a chieftain of a conquering
Charlemagne accomplishes many deeds. One includes Charlemagne capturing the Breton’s. He conquers their land in the westernmost part of Gaul since they did not listen to him (25). Charlemagne, in his lifetime, will go through many wars. Many among those are listed in Notker. Notker his second book on Charlemagne goes into more detail about how the wars were brought about. Wars His rule is not limited to wars. Charlemagne sought out to initiate a sort of Renaissance period
Einhard, in his The Life of Charlemagne, makes clear the fundamental integration of politics and religion during the reign of his king. Throughout his life, Charles the Great endeavored to acquire and use religious power to his desired ends. But, if Charlemagne was the premiere monarch of the western world, why was religious sanction and influence necessary to achieve his goals? In an age when military power was the primary means of expanding one's empire, why did the most powerful military force in Europe go to such great lengths to ensure a benevolent relationship with the church? One possibility may be found in the tremendous social and political influence of Rome and her papacy upon the whole of the continent. Rather than a force to be opposed, Charlemagne viewed the church as a potential source of political power to be gained through negotiation and alliance. The relationship was one of great symbiosis, and both componants not only survived but prospered to eventually dominate western Europe. For the King of the Franks, the church provided the means to accomplish the expansion and reformation of his empire. For the Holy Roman Church, Charles provided protection from invaders and new possibilities for missionary work.
...become great and victorious. There is the concept of how everything that Charlemagne did was for his enemies to be converted to Christianity and nothing else. Through the different interpretations, the argument for religious motives was the strongest. Charlemagne used military tactics in a misguided attempt to further the kingdom of God.
Charlemagne once said, “Right action is better than knowledge, but in order to do what is right, we must know what is right” (historymedren.com). Charlemagne proved himself to be a successful leader, and he was an inspiration to others who desired to rule Europe. He was born in 742, and very little information is known about his adolescence. Europe was trapped in its fourth century of the “dark ages” when Charlemagne was born but this quickly changed after Charlemagne became the ruler of Europe and exhibited his strong leadership skills. (livescience.com).He put a large emphasis on education and revealed that he was an inquisitive individual as he studied and spoke in many different languages. Charlemagne’s desire for success, his emphasis of culture, and his quest for knowledge ended Europe’s unproductiveness and led to great prosperity.
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.
Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
The Roman Empire, unlike that of Charlemagne’s, with its wealth and power lasted for centuries. Although the Carolingian Empire did not withstand its rule, it made many advances under the rule of Charlemagne. He and Augustus both had a similar outlook; they both wanted the same thing – everlasting reign of their empires. They had strong and forceful armies as well as men who were ever so loyal to their leaders. Throughout the years, they worked to expand their rule and territory. A vast empire that would last for eternity is what was to be accomplished. Sadly enough, neither of their empires lasted through eternity. Both of the governments had been overthrown and defeated leading to the end of the vast
Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, reigned during a time of much turmoil and upheaval in Europe during middle ages. Charlemagne’s background and family history contributed much to his rise to power. The triumphs of his past lineage prepared him to take on the task of governing the Frankish Empire, and defending it from invaders. Charlemagne accomplished much during his supremacy. He not only brought education back into medieval Europe, but also invented an efficient way to govern his people. His conquests against the many adversaries of the Holy Roman Empire expanded his empire across the majority of Europe. His conquests also formed strong ties between the Catholic Church and the State. Charlemagne’s drive to convert Europe’s primitive and pagan tribes to Christianity nearly effaced the Saxons, whom he battled with for the majority of his reign. The crowning of Charlemagne as Holy Roman Emperor created a turning point in history. Within years after his death, however, his once great empire amounted to nothing. Charlemagne’s reign as King of the Franks and as Holy Roman Emperor greatly influenced the course of Europe during the middle ages.
"The Day of the Barbarians: The Battle That Led to the Fall of the Roman Empire." Publishers Weekly 22 Jan. 2007
Charlemagne was a very religious man and it can be said that he, “Believed that it was his duty to conquer these people for the glory of God, in order to save their souls and in order to protect his Empire, Charlemagne tirelessly campaigned against the Saxons from 772 until 804” (“Charlemagne’s Reign”). Ironically, he made them convert under the tip of a sword, forced baptism or otherwise had them killed. His devotion to Christianity and the church actually ended up playing a vital role because it brought stability and morality to the empire. Nonetheless, through these wars, his ruthlessness and leadership skills were revealed. Throughout his reign, Charlemagne continued to conquer lands surrounding him, including Spain, and continuing the expansion of the Frankish kingdom.
He believes he can defeat them all if only it would stay light. He asks God to allow time to freeze so Charlemagne may complete his revenge. At that moment an angel comes to Charlemagne’s side to say “Ride on, Charles, for the light shall not desert you.” While the biblical allusion of an angelic visit needs no explanation, its significance is not as clear. The angel coming to Charlemagne’s side again shows God’s support of Charlemagne’s cause. Another interesting aspect of this proclaimation is the significance of God’s promise of light. In Genesis, while God is creating the universe he creates light on the first day. To which it is said “And God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.” Not only did God stop time for Charlemagne, he gave him more light, creating a clear divide that Charlemagne’s cause was holy. Since light is good and darkness is the antithesis, this is figurative of the Holy Christian cause compared to the corrupt Saracen
The Franks are a fervorous tribe with a feasible goal to have peace between the Germanic tribes. The Franks used to reside in the North Sea and Upper Rhine before migrating. In the tribes village they lived a peaceful life, “Under the Salian king Clovis I, founder of the Merovingian dynasty, the power and extent of the Frankish kingdom grew considerably(Willis).” This was of course after the Romans expand their empire to the Rhine. When the Romans came they split The Franks into two different tribes. The Salian Franks inhabited the territory along the lower stretches of the Rhine, and the Ripuarian Franks lived along the middle course of the river(Willis). Yet The Franks wanted to join back together.
The battle of Adrianople is a significant turning point in history and can be referred to as the beginning of the end for the Roman empire. Before we can address the battle, itself. It is important to narrate the events that led to the assault on the Romans by the Goths. The work of Ammianus Marcellinus, a fourth-century roman soldier, is used by historians as a primary source in regards to the battle of Adrianople.
The Roman Empire lasted for five hundred and seven years. In 410 AD, the Visigoths, a Germanic barbarian tribe, invaded the city. They gained possession of treasures, killed and enslaved many Romans and destroyed many buildings. In 476 AD, a Germanic barbarian named Odoacer took control of Rome. He forced Romulus Augustulus to give up his crown. After the fall of Rome much of Europe