Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about charlemagne
Legends of charlemagne
Two lives of charlemagne religious aspects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about charlemagne
During the year 800-814 Charlemagne was known as the Holy Roman emperor and king of the Franks. Throughout his reign approximately all of central and western Europe was included in his Kingdom and Carolingian Renaissance was also started by him. There were two main territories in his empire namely west and east Francia which are chief parts of two important entities of Europe. Initially the East Francia was the Holy Roam Empire but later became the German modern state and while West Francia is modern day France.
Charlemagne is believed as the father of Europe who ruled the immense Frankish kingdom since 768 till his death in 814 and from the year 800 he was also the Holy Roman emperor. After the collapse of Rome he established the initial empire of Western Europe. His Aix-la-Chapelle court was known as the centre of Carolingian Renaissance and was also considered as hub of classical learning. Chalrlemagne’s legend and life is being impressively introduced in this book.
During this time growth as an emperor is described by Matthias Becher, he also outlines Charlemagne’s military and political strategies used against the Lombards, the Saxons, and others which resulted in integrating of these domains into his empire. Under the Charlemagne reign huge changes were seen as pointed by Becher like introduction of jury courts, introduction of new coinage, beginning of Frankish framer, revision and writing of laws of the Franks and reformation of weights and measures. Becher also specifies that antique traditions were being referred by Charlemagne for providing spiritual basis to his kingdom and existence of tension due to difference between traditional and modern thinking in Charlemagne’s court was also explored by him. Becher thus conclu...
... middle of paper ...
...ting against the Lombards (people of Germany who were having control over the central and northern part of Itlay) to protect the Pope. Also during the same period Charlemagne understood the significance of Roman Catholic Church and worldly powers.
Through 768-814 Charlemagne ruled over Western Europe including France, Belgium, Franks, Netherlands, Western Germany and Luxembourg. He was also called as Karl & Charles The Great. He had a motive of uniting all the Germanic people into a single kingdom and to transform them to Christianity. Keeping his goal as his first priority, he spend major time period of his rule indulged in wars. He became King of Rome during 800 and was crowned by Pope Leo III. Charlemagne was able to accomplish his goals before he died in 814. He spread Christianity in west, stimulated the Carolingian Renaissance, reinforced cultural in Europe.
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
Einhard divides his discussion of Charlemagne into three distinct sections, perhaps in imitation of the king’s will, which is also partitioned into the same three underlying themes: church, empire, and intellect.
Charlemagne is a known for his success to try to maintain his empire. This new empire will embrace the unity of Christian faith. Under Charlemagne, new lands are conquered and a Renaissance is embraced. He even tries to revive the Christian faith. Charlemagne is a man that hopes to be an inspiration to the next generation. These deeds of Charlemagne is seen in the Two Lives of Charlemagne. In the Two lives of Charlemagne, both Notker’s and Einhard’s goal is to portray Charlemagne as a man of good character, a man that accomplishes many deeds and a man that hopes to provide an outlet for the next generation.
After contemplating Einhard’s purpose for writing The Life of Charlemagne it is important to examine his qualifications for doing so. Early on in the introduction there is a brief history on Einhard and his education.
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
The Relationship of Political and Religious Societies in the Age of Charlemagne, Based of Einhard's The life of Charlemagne sections 15-33
After reading two versions of “The Life of Charlemagne”, one written by a person who lived with Charlemagne, and one who didn’t, it is evident that Charlemagne is portrayed in a negative way by the author, the Monk of St. Gall, and in a positive way by Einhard. Einhard was very close to Charlemagne. He lived at the same time and with Charlemagne himself. His version of “The Life of Charlemagne” was writing right after his death. The Monk of St. Gall wrote his version more than 70 years after Charlemagne’s death. He did not live with or even at the same time as Charlemagne. This is probably one of the reasons the view on the ruler are completely different.
The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.
...become great and victorious. There is the concept of how everything that Charlemagne did was for his enemies to be converted to Christianity and nothing else. Through the different interpretations, the argument for religious motives was the strongest. Charlemagne used military tactics in a misguided attempt to further the kingdom of God.
Throughout the Ages there have been many leaders who were known for their great rule. One of these great men during the 8th century was Charlemagne. The Life of Charlemagne was written by Einhard, a Frankish elite who had the privilege of working in the courts of Charlemagne. The book did not come out till after Charlemagne’s death but, it goes through his life in a thematic fashion. Einhard sets the book by first addressing deeds, habits, and then administration. This writing was one of the first of its kind. While there were many biographies written on the lives of saints known as hagiography, this was the first of its kind to be written about a secular ruler since the time of Antiquity. I will begin by talking about Charlemagne’s rise to power, then about his character and personality, and finally his relationship with his family.
“The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.
Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
Throughout the middle ages, many empires were working on expanding their territory, but it was not always a success unless they had the appropriate leadership to guide them in the right direction. The main empire that grew to extraordinary lengths is that of the Roman Empire. Through many conquests and battles and with an amicable government, it attained its fortune. However, on the other hand, there was another government that shared similarities with that of Rome; this was the empire of Charlemagne, otherwise known as the Carolingian Empire, but it failed to have a prosperous eternity.
After life as a King, emperor, husband and father Charlemagne’s last final 4 years of life, suffered from fevers and a limp. He divided up his empire among his heirs, but by the late 800s it dissolved. Charles the great will be remembered in history for many things, both good and bad. If there was one thing that he knew he did right, it would have been being a great father to his 18 or more
Constantine was devoutly Christian and was the first Christian Roman emperor. Like Diocletian Constantine also came into power as Rome was facing many problems. Furthermore, Constantine also proposed and implemented many of the same solutions as Diocletian, such as strengthening the central government. Additionally Constantine furthered the division of the Roman empire into western and eastern portions by creating the imperial capital of Constantinople where Europe and Asia meet. Moreover, Constantine also regained Dacia and fought off Germanic