Are certain kinds of people as bad as our family and society raised us to believe? What lengths must one go through in order to learn the truth? In The Boy in Striped Pajamas, the story is about Bruno, an adventurous and naïve eight year old German child living in Berlin in Nazi Germany. Since Bruno’s father, Ralf, received a promotion as the Commandant of a concentration camp, Bruno and his family were relocated to the countryside next to the camp for Ralf to oversee. Having left his friends behind in Berlin, Bruno despises his new home as he has no one his age to play with. Later, Bruno discovers what he believes to be a “farm” (the concentration camp) in the distance. Although Bruno’s parent forbade Bruno from getting close to the camp, …show more content…
For example, as a German soldier, Ralf prioritizes his work for the military over his own family which results in having little time to spend with Bruno. Gretel, Bruno’s sister, acts as the mature, yet ignorant, sibling in the family as she tosses aside her old toys and playful personality to a more serious mentality to support the Third Reich, showing the effects of German propaganda on its population to aim their hatred towards the non-German people and support the …show more content…
The spectacle and melody in the movie are the “pleasurable accessories of Tragedy” in that, despite their minor roles, they are two parts of the whole in a tragedy (72). The thought and diction behind a character’s lines or lack thereof carry messages of significance to carry out the plot and convey the morals behind its actions to the audience. The characters of a tragedy are defined by the actions they take and act as a medium to convey their moral purpose in the plot. Finally, the plot must flow from its beginning to its end with a unified, cohesive series of events while revealing peripeteia and discoveries as the tragedy draws closer to its conclusion. In the end, Bruno, a boy stuck in-between his family and their country’s beliefs and his friendship with Shmuel, the Jew Bruno was supposed to be brought up to hate, would eventually lead to his untimely death whilst not understanding the gravity of the situation surrounding Nazi Germany during the World
Joshua and Guido are abducted put on a train to the concentration camp. Immediately, he begins the attempt to protect his son by telling him the train is part of a surprise for Joshua’s birthday. Guido continues this adlibbing as they arrive at the camp by constructing a game. He tells Joshua that everyone in the concentration camp is partaking in the game, and the first to reach a thousand points is the winner. The winner of the game will receive the grand prize of a real tank, Joshua’s favorite toy. Guido knew this was the only way to preserve his son’s life. Guido’s role is not only to protect himself, but his son as well. An applied comedic section begins when several guards enter the room, and yell something in German. Unable to understand, Guido asks Bartolomeo, a fellow prisoner, what the guard said. Bartolomeo says the guard asked if any one spoke German. Guido’s hand shot up right away, even though he of course did not speak German. This contributes to the humor of the film. Pretending to understand, he “translates” what the guard had said into the rules of the game. Joshua giggles at the rules his father proposes, when in actuality this was destined to be a serious moment by the Germans and prisoners of the camp to explain the rules of the camp. In fact, however, this is another attempt to save his son from the monstrosities of the encampment. Later, Guido finds Joshua in the room after he had ran away from the group that was heading to showers. He tells Joshua to return to the group and go take a shower. Little did they both know, the showers were actually gas chambers. Guido’s fatherly advice is indeed a death sentence. The dramatic effect of the irony closely portrays an essence of comedy. Joshua’s childlike stubbornness essentially saves him. The enormity of the situation strikes the comedic effect. This scene reflects the
The archetypal tragedy of two star-crossed lovers, separated by familial hate, is a recurring theme, which never fails to capture the minds of the audience. It is only at great cost, through the death of the central characters that these feuding families finally find peace. This is an intriguing idea, one antithetical. I have chosen to analyze both Shakespeare 's Romeo and Juliet and Laurent 's West Side Story. The purpose of this essay is showing how the spoken language is utilized in these different plays to meet differing objectives. The chosen scenes to further aid comparison and contrast are the balcony scenes.
The Book Thief and Nazi Germany The heavily proclaimed novel “The Book Thief” by Markus Zusak is a great story that can help you understand what living in Nazi Germany was like. Throughout the story, the main character, Liesel goes through many hardships to cope with a new life in a new town and to come to the recognition of what the Nazi party is. Liesel was given up for adoption after her mother gave her away to a new family, who seemed harsh at first, but ended up being the people who taught her all the things she needed to know. Life with the new family didn’t start off good, but the came to love them and her new friend, Rudy.
Society establishes their own rules of morality, but would they be accepted in these days?
John Boyne’s book “The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas” is set in the area bordering Nazi Germany and Poland in the 1940s. The story concern a young German boy named Bruno, his family and the unlikely friendship he has between another boy named Schmuel, imprisoned in Auschwitz.
This film is divided into two separate parts. First, is a story that shows a situation in Italy during the Nazi occupation of World War II. There are a couple of members of a secret underground movement that try to keep the Nazis away from them. This movement is made up of poor Italians, who are troubled by the war and other Nazi ideologies. One of the members of the revolutionist group is engaged to a mother of the young boy, and the wedding is about to take place in a matter of days. But all sorts of problems follow, and all of this is based on how the Nazis will finally catch up with these traitors. The second, more effective and emotional part of the film is a tragic melodrama.
... a perfect example of a truly innocent person (Shmuel) and an arguably unsympathetic character (Bruno) whom can be portrayed as denying the truth meeting the same fate. As we can see by Lennie’s death and Bruno’s death, ignorance and innocence lead to the same fate in the end.
The environment surrounding the star-crossed lovers in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet can influence audiences who may interpret the scenes in different ways. The audience can be greatly affected in their interpretation of the story by the mise-en-scene, costuming, and the hidden symbolic meaning. This great piece of literature was edited in two unique and intriguing forms, one Zeferelli directed which was filmed in 1968, and the modern version produced in 1996. The different scenes throughout the length of the party were the most influential to me in that I saw how different these movies were directed, and the different meaning I experienced from watching these movies. Focusing on the environment of the scenes and the costuming helped me in my interpretation, because I found hidden symbolism from these two qualities.
In the tremendous play of ‘Romeo & Juliet’, Shakespeare’s ways engages the audience straight away. The astounding methods he uses hooks the audience into the play and allows them to read on, wondering what will happen. The tragic love story of Romeo & Juliet, as mentioned in the prologue, sets a variety of themes throughout Act 1 Scene 5. Many of the recognisable themes are: youth and age, revenge, forbidden love, fate, action and hate. The main idea of the play is a feud that had been going on between two families, The ‘Montagues and Capulets’, the son of the Montagues and the daughter of the Capulets fall in love and the story tells us how tragic, death, happiness and revenge find them throughout the play.
This play brings out the differences between the upper class to that of the middle class and lower class people. Moreover, the characters’ follies and foolishness lies at the core of this drama. Deceit and lies, love and marriage are also some major themes in this drama. There are three acts in this drama, all interlinked with each other. The first act of this drama introduces us to the main characters, their complications and sufferings. There are more complications in the second act. These complications lead the plot to its climax and finally the happy conclusion in the final act. The plot of this play is based on inconsistent actions, unbelievable characters and coincidences. The plot is compact and closely knit but the audiences appreciate the play not because of its unity of scenes but due to the art of characterization employed in the play by Wilde.
Morality has always been defined as having either a good or evil conscious. There is always a choice that a character makes that defines their moral integrity in a literary work and distinguishes them as the hero. In Mark Twain’s story, “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”, not only does Huck encounters a number of moral circumstances where he or other characters displays situations in which moral ethics is called to questioned, but it proves that despite the religious influence and social expectation, it is through Huck that in order to do what is morally right, one must challenge the moral teaching of the world. Through observation of his world, Huck makes morally ambiguous choices that though may be against his moral teachings. Choice proves that to act on one’s own judgement despite societies expectations demonstrates that hypocrisy of the community as Twain clearly depicts and satirizes Southern society, he depicts the violence and racism that was described as “silvilization”(Kelly). As the community in Twain’s novel follows the general religious teachings and distinguishes the binaries associated with good and evil, Huck is forced to forsake these teachings and goes on a journey to discover his own moral understanding.
It is challenging to imagine that a novel about the Holocaust could ever be comparable to a Grimm fairy tale, however, The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas and Poverty and Humility Lead to Heaven maintain fascinating similarities through the stories of their respective main characters under ‘The Quest’ storyline framework that the pieces follow. Further, both Bruno and the Prince demonstrate senses of basic goodness and fall victim to family betrayal and crimes of status.
context of the piece and the society in which the characters are living in. Everything
Spielberg’s Schindler’s List uses a variety of macro and micro techniques that are effective in eliciting strong emotional response form the spectator. Unlike horror films, which rely on micro techniques to create tension or foreshadowing, Spielberg relies on unconventional techniques that are often juxtaposed to have the spectator feel unsettled. Despite not being a horror film, it is compatible through the lack of violence in the film and the context of the Holocaust. Therefore, as a spectator, it is clear that ‘horror’ in a horror movie differs greatly to ‘horror’ in this particular film because of Spielberg’s raw and authentic style in making the spectator feel uneasy as the narrative progresses.
Somethings in history and in life needs to be put in perspective so children can understand. I watched this movie for the first time when I was about twelve and the movie showed more than i understood. It implied what happened during the time like the violence but did not show it. The older i got older, the more I could fully comprehend what was taking place during the movie. Throughout the movie you realize that most people were ignorant to the full extent to what was happening. Bruno’s mother did not know what was actually going on in her husband 's concentration camp, she did not found out until a comment from kolter about a foul smell from the