Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Influence of Culture and Social Interactions on Personality
Define the personality
Biological, psychological and sociocultural influences upon personality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When we talk about individual personality, we are talking about a blend of traits that makes a person unique. It can be defined as the dynamic composition of an individual including systems- psychological and physical- that represents his or her behaviour and thought. According to idiographic theorists, each has a unique mental organization and that some characteristics are only possessed by only one person. Due to this uniqueness in traits, it becomes hard to compare one person with another. There are several theories that have been developed to explain personality. Some of these include Psychoanalytic theories, Behaviourist theories, Social cognitive theories and Humanistic theories. This paper will use two of these approaches (Behaviourist …show more content…
This is due to the difference in their traits, for example, some individual is more sociable in the presence of many people than others. However, it familiar that different individuals portray significant similarity when placed under certain situations. Behaviourist theories suggest that one’s personality is developed depending on the external stimuli surrounding him ("Situation versus Personality Debate," 2017). According to B.F Skinner, the main difference between individual behaviour come as a result of our experiences. He says that different learn these traits either directly through a reward or punishment causing a reinforcement of a good or bad behaviour in a person or indirectly through observation and modelling. Following this suggestion, individual behaviour can be understood by the way he reacts to the surrounding or present situation. For instance, if an individual is placed in a playground or a battlefield it is expected that they will be more aggressive than usual. Even for the submissive individuals, they become aggressive when put in an unusual situation. This shows that one’s personality can help in understanding one’s …show more content…
As opposed to forced behaviour, this approach focuses on personal subjective experiences. Each can actively decide how to act irrespective of the situation he or she is under. According to this theory, every individual is alone in the world, until they find a meaning or purpose of their life. Through identification of ones meaning, an individual can now know his or her personality. Unlike behaviourist where reinforcement is required to develop behaviour traits which will form one’s character, in humanistic, an individual develops his personality through self-actualization.
Rogers, a humanistic theorist tend to oppose behaviouristic theory. In his article, stated that the human and other organism has one goal which is to attain self-actualization. Every individual should be trying to find his meaning in the world. According to him, a typical individual is one who is in the process of attaining self-actualization. About personality, an individual should be free thinkers who trust their feeling, not the environment. He says the only reason people exist is to satisfy the need of
A Comparison of Psychodynamic and Social Learning in Regards to the Development of Personality "No Works Cited" “Psychologists define personality in many ways, but common to all of the ways are two basic concepts, uniqueness and characteristic patterns of behaviour. We will define personality as the complex set of unique psychological qualities that influence an individuals characteristic patterns of behaviour across different situations and over time.” (Psychology In Life, Phillip .G. Zimbardo, page 509)
What is personality and why do we study it? For more than 100 years psychologists have been trying to define exactly what personality is and is not. According to our text, personality is defined as “consistent behavior patterns and intrapersonal processes originating within the individual” (Burger, J., 2005, p. 4) The seven major approaches to personality are Freudian psychoanalytic, Neo-Freudian psychoanalytic, trait, biological, humanistic, behavioral/social learning, and cognitive. No one approach has been able to determine exactly how personality is formed, but each of these approaches has helped add to a higher learning of possibly how personality is formed. In
Every single individual has a personality; it is the very quintessence of human existence. Personality drives our interactions with others, our desires – conscious and unconscious, our perceived needs, and to a certain extent, even our actions. Psychodynamic approaches to personality are focused on the belief that we have virtually no control over our own personality, that it is primarily controlled by unconscious powers. Social cognitive approaches to personality centers around the belief that we still have little to no control over our own personality, and that the cognitive influence, that is to say thoughts, feelings, expectations and values – along with the observation of others behavior is the primary influence on personality. These two approaches to personality are so radically different, and yet both have their own merits – they are two of many, and nobody is quite sure what the truth is.
Humanistic psychology relies on client centred therapy and the idea that each individual has the potential to achieve a position in their psyche named self actualisation. Humanistic psychology differs from psychodynamic theory in that it is optimistic about the human psyche and does not view conflict as inevitable. Humanistic psychology assumes people attach meaning to their unique perspectives on the world and that behaviour is strongly influenced by this. Carl Rogers defined the healthy personality as being one that had congruence between the perceived self and the experienced self and that the individual in question experienced unconditional positive regard from their parent or guardian. He defined an unhealthy personality as being one which lacked these components. Abraham Maslow alternatively suggested a hierarchy for which a person’s healthy personality could be measured by stages of psychological and physical needs (see diagram 2). He suggested that, for a person to achieve self actualisation and become a fully functioning person, they must first satisfy all the needs of each level in the pyramid before moving onto the next
Personality is patterns of thinking, behavior and emotional responses that make up individuality over time. Psychologist attempt to understand how personality develops and its impact on how we behave. Several theories attempt to explain personality, using different approaches. The social-cognitive and humanistic approaches are two of many theories that attempt to explain personality. This essay will identify the main concepts of social-cognitive and humanistic approach, identify perspective differences and discuss approach limitations.
Psychodynamic and behavioural approaches are the two major approaches to personality, however, they view personality from different perspectives. Psychodynamic approach makes the argument that personality is caused by forces in the unconscious that are not learned. The individual has little control over their behaviour as it is predetermined, and early childhood plays a crucial part in shaping a person’s personality. Behavioural approach, on the other hand, recognises personality as learned and focuses only on present behavioural matters. Because of
Personality can be defined as an individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling and acting. Many personality theorists have put forward claims as to where personality is derived from and how it develops throughout an individual’s life. The two main personality theories this essay will be focusing on is the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) (Bandura, 1986) and the Trait Theory – Five Factor Theory (FFT) (McCrae and Costa, 1995). The SCT allocates a central role to cognitive, observational learning and self-regulatory processes (Bandura, 1986). An individual’s personality develops through experiences with their sociocultural environment. Whereas the Trait Theory proposes that all individuals are predisposed with five traits (Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Neuroticism) which determines our personality. This theory also puts forward that personality is stable and cannot change as it’s biologically determined.
A Comparison of the Main Approaches to Personality Psychology Psychology of personality is a difficult concept to define and quantify, therefore most personality theories, however different they may be in other respects, share the basic assumption, that personality is a particular pattern of behaviour and thinking, that prevails across time and situations and differentiates one person from another. Most theories attempting to explain personality represent part of the classic psychological Nature verse Nurture debate. In other words, is personality “inherited”, or developed through our interactions with the environment. In addition, we shall compare and contrast two of the main approaches to personality psychology by concentrating on Psychoanalytical Theory (Freud) and Social Learning Theory (Bandura). By looking at the Psychodynamic approach, developed by Freud, we can argue that it emphasizes the interplay of unconscious psychological processes in determining human thought, feelings, and behaviours.
The study of personality traits is beneficial in identifying the many variables that exist from human to human; the combinations of these variables provide us with a true level of individuality and uniqueness. In the field of psychology, trait theory is considered to be a key approach to the study of human personality (Crowne, 2007; Burton, Westen & Kowalski, 2009). This paper aims to identify a number of significant contributors who have played crucial roles in both the development and application of trait theory. This paper then moves focus to these theorists, outlining their theory and analysing both the strengths and weaknesses of those theories. An illustration of the methods used in trait measurement is given and includes the arguments for and against such procedures.
In an article written by Klaus and Ursula Scherer (1981), it was evident that all human beings tend to categorize others on the basis of behavior including sociable versus withdrawn, stable versus neurotic, cautious versus reckless and so forth. They further identify that this is a naturally occurring phenomena for any layman, even though they may not use the word personality as it is used in psychology. Psychologists on the other hand have identified behavior constructs that underlie perception and showed that people are likely to classify people in terms of their speech behavior. This is justified by the fact that personality mostly manifests itself to behavior which is subject to little external restrictions. In the case of verbal aspects for example, certain aspects are viewed to have limit...
The humanistic perspective on personality deals exclusively with human behavior. Humanistic psychologists believe that human nature includes a natural drive towards personal growth, that humans have the freedom to choose what they do regardless of environmental factors, and humans are mostly conscious beings and are not controlled by unconscious needs and conflicts. They also believe that a person's subjective view of the world is more important than objective reality. Two of the humanistic theorists that have made an impact of humanism are Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
When we are born, over time we grow up and develop a personality. For each person, our personalities differentiate between one another which presents a wide variety of individuals. According to psychology, there are different factors that make up who we are. Today, I will be talking about the four major theories of personality (Psychodynamic, five-factor model, humanistic, and social-cognitive).
Organizations across the world consist of individuals with varying personality types and traits. This variance provides an array of strengths and weaknesses within an organization. In order to fully grasp the melting pot of personalities, one must first come to understand and acknowledge the pros and cons associated with his personality. Once the individual personality is examined, we may then examine the relationship between differing personalities as well their role within organizations. My individual personality type of ESTJ is examined, with specific regard to my role within the organizational setting as an employee, coworker, and manager. Potential drawbacks of the ESTJ personality are discussed in conjunction with potential strengths. Ultimately, our varying personalities are a result of the Lord’s handiwork and ought to be celebrated in all walks of life. In the future, greater research ought to be
A person’s personality is an individual’s pattern of thoughts, feelings and behaviours (Roy, 2014). It is what enables every human being to be his/her own unique person. There are many theories that can impact the clarification of “Personality Development”.
Personality is the expression of a person’s traits according to ones feelings, mentality and behavior. It involves understanding individuals’ traits such as withdrawal and willpower and how various parts of an individual link together to form personality. Personality expresses itself from within an individual and is comparatively regular throughout in an individual’s life. Different people have different personalities dependent on factors such as environment and genetic composition. Our personality is dependent on the success or failure of our development in the eight stages of life. This is proposed by Erik Erikson. Success in the development stages lead to virtues while the failure leads to malignancies.