Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
123 essays on character analysis
123 essays on character analysis
123 essays on character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 123 essays on character analysis
In John Green’s novel, Looking for Alaska, the author presents a rather unique character in Alaska Young. There are many ways in which one can interpret the character traits of Alaska; however, a trait that particularly stands out about Alaska is the fact that she is strong-willed. An example that shows the fact that she is strong-willed is described in the early stages of the novel. In this example, Chip Martin, who is predominantly referenced as The Colonel, needs help ironing his shirt before a formal date with his girlfriend to the opera. He does not know how to iron, so he asks Alaska to iron his shirt while assuming that she knows how to iron because she is a girl. When this happens, she responds “You’re not going to impose the patriarchal Finally, because Alaska never changes how strong-willed she is, she is classified as a static character. This is shown even after her death because she designs a prank that perfectly describes animated she is towards the patriarchal paradigm. The prank takes place in the gym with a fake lecturer about sexual orientation who happens to be a male stripper. While he is lecturing about how important it is for men not to objectify women, one of the main characters, Lara, is in on the prank, and asks him to take of his shirt. He replies, “What we have here is a very interesting case study - a female objectifying me, a male. It’s so unusual that I can only assume you’re making an attempt at humor....” (Green 208). He then follows this with him agreeing with Lara that he should take off his shirt, saying, “It is certainly important to subvert the patriarchal paradigm” (Green 208). These quotes show that Alaska does not change because even after she dies, her base values and beliefs that she was so strong-willed about did not change. In conclusion, Alaska Young is a very unique character that can be classified as strong-willed and passionate about what she believes
Many people were puzzled on why the young man decided to go on such an expedition without being properly prepared. His death has led to a controversy between whether he should be idolized for having the courage to follow his dream or repulsed for his grand stupidity. Although Krakauer never met McCandless, he provides his readers with personal examples that explain why the young man went on this journey. Expecting his readers to comprehend McCandless, Krakauer’s primary purpose is to help his readers understand the importance of embracing one's personal dreams. In order to achieve his purpose, he uses a variation of literary and rhetorical techniques. Some of these techniques include epigrams and ethos. These devices are essential to Krakauer’s purpose because they illustrate and explain the reasons why McCandless went into the inhospitable landscape of Alaska.
For this literary analysis I am working with Edith Wharton’s short story “Roman Fever”. From the beginning of the story it is easy to see that Wharton uses gender stereotypes, from the time that the story is set in, to expose perennial antagonism of true human nature. The story’s two main charters, Grace Ansley and Alida Slide, early on in the story already have some past tension that continues to develop into a heated exchange until the shocking twist towards the end of the story. Gender stereotypes in Roman fever play an important role in creating tension between Mrs. Slade and Mrs. Ansley that ultimately leads to reason of why there is an underlying conflict between the two.
In his essay, “Come Back to the Raft Ag’in, Ed Gentry,” Betina Entzminger argues that at the heart of James Dickey’s Deliverance lies the search for a lost masculinity in today’s world, told through the lens of the protagonist’s canoe trip. He asserts that Ed understands the societal pressures upon each gender, forces that compel us towards the stereotypes that pervade our culture. Further, Entzminger believes, “Despite the fact that Ed sees these constructions as constructions, he is unable to rise above them” (Entzminger). Ultimately, Entzminger posits, “Ed dutifully destroys that which challenges his own and his community’s conceptions of gender and sexuality, and he finds comfort in his return to his community at the novel’s close” (Entzminger). However, though Entzminger is correct that Ed never does ascend beyond society’s gender constructions, his error is in his assumption that Ed ever wanted to, or that he even should have.
In the 19th Century, women had different roles and treated differently compared to today’s women in American society. In the past, men expected women to carry out the duties of a homemaker, which consisted of cleaning and cooking. In earlier years, men did not allow women to have opinions or carry on a job outside of the household. As today’s societies, women leave the house to carry on jobs that allow them to speak their minds and carry on roles that men carried out in earlier years. In the 19th Century, men stereotyped women to be insignificant, not think with their minds about issues outside of the kitchen or home. In the play Trifles, written by Susan Glaspell, the writer portrays how women in earlier years have no rights and men treat women like dirt. Trifles is based on real life events of a murder that Susan Glaspell covered during her work as a newspaper reporter in Des Moines and the play is based off of Susan Glaspell’s earlier writing, “A Jury of Her Peers”. The play is about a wife of a farmer that appears to be cold and filled with silence. After many years of the husband treating the wife terrible, the farmer’s wife snaps and murders her husband. In addition, the play portrays how men and women may stick together in same sex roles in certain situations. The men in the play are busy looking for evidence of proof to show Mrs. Wright murdered her husband. As for the women in the play, they stick together by hiding evidence to prove Mrs. Wright murdered her husband. Although men felt they were smarter than women in the earlier days, the play describes how women are expected of too much in their roles, which could cause a woman to emotionally snap, but leads to women banding together to prove that women can be...
Parry, Joseph D. "Interpreting Female Agency and Responsibility in The Miller's Tale and The Merchant's Tale." 80.2 (2001): 133-67. Academic Onefile. Web. 16 May 2013.
Nora and Mrs. Wright’s social standing when compared to the men in each play is inferior. Both works expose their respective male characters’ sexist view of women diminishing the women’s social standing. Each work features egotistical men who have a severely inflated view of their self-worth when compared to their female counterparts. The men’s actions and words indicate they believe women are not capable of thinking intelligently. This is demonstrated in “Trifles” when Mr. Hale makes the statement about women only worrying about mere trifles. It is also apparent in “A Dollhouse” when Torvalds thinks his wife is not capable of thinking with any complexity (Mazur 17). Another common attribute is of the women’s social standing is displayed as both women finally get tired of feeling like second class citizens and stand up to the repressive people in the women’s lives (Mulry 294). Although both women share much in common in their social standing there subtle differences. Torvald’s sexist view of Nora is more on a personal level in “A Dollhouse” while the male characters’ sexist views in “Trifles” seem to be more of a social view that women are not very smart and their opinions are of little value. This attitude is apparent in “Trifles” as Mr. Hale and Mr. Henderson’s comments about Mrs. Wright’s housekeeping (Mulry 293). As the women in both works reach their emotional
...y to put on a bathing suit from former Miss America Jacque Mercer or Ladies’ Home Journal of Betsy Martin McKinney, etc.. Furthermore, to make her essay more enjoyable, Peril did not use formal or polished voice, but a common parlance and included some humor, too. To illustrate, she depicted, “a woman who fears mice isn’t necessarily following the dictates of pink think. On the other hand, a woman who isn’t afraid of mice but pretends to be because she thinks such helplessness adds to her appearance of femininity is toeing the pink think party line” (Peril, 282). It would totally make me roar with laughter. It was extremely hard to say no when laughing. Therefore, by using funny anecdotes, the author has earned my attentions and assents. Lynn Peril chose an intelligent choice to make me go with her, and object the way of thinking about feminine ideal and pink think.
In a subtle way, Brush also makes the wife’s actions selfish. Even though her husband was wrong to react in the way that he did, she was also selfish in her actions. Clearly, her husband has a shy personality because “he was hotly embarrassed” (13) in front of “such few people as there were in the restaurant” (11). Using a couple of this age (“late thirties” (1)), Brush asserts that the wife should have known her husband’s preferences and been sensitive to them. The author also uses the seemingly opposite descriptions the couple: “There was nothing conspicuous about them” (5) and the “big hat” (4) of the woman. The big hat reveals the wife’s desire to be noticed.
Alaska did not really have a name until she was seven years old, when she chose the name “Alaska.” She chose it because when she saw it on the globe, she decided she wanted to be like it when she grew up; big and far away from her home. She had a tragic childhood in which she felt overlooked. Taking “Alaska” as her name seemed like a way for her to redeem herself and turn her life around, shaping it around the meaning behind her name.
There are many ways people or individuals may feel a woman/man should present themselves, or behave a certain way. Many people act deign or uncharacterized with no internal drive like in the vignettes “Marin”, and “Alicia Who Sees Mice”.
Not only can roles affect someone’s life, but they also affect society. The roles that the characters have in “Chains” impact how genders are viewed. Isabel, Madam Lockton, and Lady Seymour play the role of the weak and helpless women that are only valued for their looks and ability to perform domestic jobs. Madam Lockton “chose the prettiest of the soldier wives to wait at the tables.” because it was important to please the men and “the ugly ones and Sarah with her big belly were to stay in the kitchen to assist the cook, and wash up” (Anderson 206). The stereotypical gender roles of both men and women are portrayed by using the prettiest soldier wives to serve for they are only valued for their looks. Although the women had certain roles that they were to play, but the men did as well. The men were expected to be the leader of the house and provide for their families and were only valued for their combat skills, wealth, and their societal ranking. The gender roles in “Chains” reinforce the traditional stereotypes of men and women by impacting how society back then considered these roles to be ‘normal.’
If you take Checkers, for example, she was a coward that hid behind a fake name and persona, but she always knew what she wanted. She was a bold woman who knew what she had and didn’t mind flaunting it if it was necessary. Deep down she was scared, scared of being unwanted. She looked for men, who wouldn’t be a good match for her and rode it out until it came to a screeching halt. For her, nothing ever seemed to go right in her love life and the song treaties explains it with “Somebody breaks a hard promise. Somebody breaks your tired heart.” (Alexie 30). She is this lost torn soul who couldn’t help, but to want to be out of her own skin. She is missing out on the enjoyment of herself by embracing what she only has to offer. She has more than just her body to give. She can give so much more but is limited to the way she views herself. Smith goes into detail about the hierarchy of how it is viewed being a woman, man, and then a priest. Smith notes that “They had to convince ‘both men and women that a woman’s proper place was under the authority of her husband and that a man’s proper place was under the authority of the priests.’” (23). By trying to align herself with Father Arnold, she would have a lot more influence than those around her. Janicki even realizes that Alexie uses her own wants against her by playing up that she would rather
In Louis Sachar’s award winning book Holes, we see gender biases in many characters. The first and most obvious bias in this book can be found in the way Sachar’s characters address Mr. Pendanski, one of the staff members at Camp Green Lake. Many of the boys refer to him sarcastically as “mom”, and it is not because of his loving nature. Mr. Pendanski is neurotic about things the boys consider trivial and he has a tendency to nag them. Because Mr. Pendanski is portrayed as the antithesis of Mr. Sir, who simply drips testosterone, others view him as a female for his weakness. The fact that Sachar allows his characters to equate weakness with femininity, or more accurately motherhood, shows a certain bias towards the supposed strength that innately accompanies masculinity. This attitude is only furthered by the fact that the rest of the book as almost totally devoid of female characters other than the witch-like caricature presented to us in the form of the warden. She comes complete with a vicious disposition and poisonous fingernails.
So what exactly is being a “big wheel”? According to the text “ This rule refers to the centrality of success and power in the definition of masculinity. Masculinity is measured more by wealth, power, and status than by any particular body part”(541). Basically, Kimmel is saying that being a man is about being at the top and being better than other men by competing for the wealth, power and status. The way that it is being enforced and has been enforced for decades is being a young boy and learning what is expected of you when you become a man. We can take a look at how this happens every day in society, according to Dr. Phillip McGraw better know as Dr. Phil in order to be successful in your marriage and family you must be a “provider”, “protector”, “leader”, and “teacher”(www.drphil.com). After looking at these four traits we can see how they relate to masculinity. By being a provider we must provide financially which relates back to wealth, which is also a measurement of masculinity, but we must also provide by in other ways such as emotionally and mentally. Being a protector is the ability to protect and keep your family safe from threats, which can relate to having power. A leader is giving 100 percent to your family and marriage by taking initiative as to what needs to be done. A teacher is just being a role model and setting the right example and this goes hand in hand with being a leader, which would be your status in the family. What is wrong
The traditional female gender roles of passivity and submission are first reinforced by Mrs Ramsay's attitude and behaviour towards her husband and the guests at her house. Mrs Ramsay is not a helpless woman but she is not independent in the way that Lily Briscoe is. While she is perfectly capable of being the boss of trivial and "womanly" things such as dinner, the higher level decisions are always made by her husband. For example, in the beginning of the novel, Mrs Ramsay tells her son, James, that, weather permitting, they would go to the lighthouse the next day. Mr Ramsay insists that, "it won't be fine" (9). They do not go to the lighthouse. Mrs Ramsay submits to her husband's decision.