Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis essay
After twenty years of literary analysis
Literary analysis of two kinds
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis essay
Have you ever met anyone that has been ungrateful or any friend that always wants to be right about everything? Well there are 2 short stories called “The Necklace”and “The Bet”. Dialog in “The Necklace” and in ”The Bet” functions to reveal aspects of character by showing their behavior or their thoughts and their character traits.
To start off, in “The Necklace” written by Guy de Maupassant (1884) Mathilde Loisel dialogue to show her character traits. Mathilde behavior was unpleasant because she wanted to buy a dress for the dance in the ballroom. Mathilde wanted to be unique she wanted to buy a dress that wouldn’t be the same as the other woman in the ballroom. Her husband was nice enough to obtain her that invitation, yet she was ungrateful for the invitation that her husband
…show more content…
This can describe as her being spoiled because although her husband got her the letter she wanted more and her husband gave her more. In other words, Madame Forestier is another character in “The Necklace” whose dialogue is shown. Madame Forestier let her friend Mathilde Loisel borrow a necklace that was gorgeous and unique she was going to attract attention towards her. “Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin case, a superb diamond necklace; her heart began to beat covetously. Her hands trembled as she lifted it. She fastened it round her neck, upon her high dress, and remained in ecstasy at sight of her. Then, with hesitation, she asked in anguish: "Could you lend me this, just this alone?" "Yes, of course." (Guy De Maupassant 1884). This showed that Madame Forestier was nice enough to let Mathilde borrow the necklace.
Furthermore, “The Bet” written by Anton Chekhov (1889) used the banker to reveal their behavior and character trait that was showed in the story. The banker showed that he was willing to kill the lawyer to so that the banker wouldn’t receive his money that he had bet. “It’s not true! I’ll bet you two million
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde feels she has been born into a family of unfavorable economic status. She’s so focused on what she doesn’t have. She forgets about her husband who treats her good. She gets too carried away being someone someone
The Necklace is a great example of how our desires can create tragedy rather than happiness. Madame Forestier would have rather been idolized for her wealth instead of buying items that grant her survival. She says,”It’s just that I have no evening dress and so I can’t go to the party.” which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to a life.
The dialogue in “ The Bet” written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1889 ) used The Banker s dialogue to reveal her behavior because it shows how The Banker is unfair . “The Bet” written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1889) used the Lawyer’s and The Banker’s dialogue to reveal their behaviors and character traits because it shows the way they act. He wants to kill the lawyer because he doesn't have 2 million dollars.(Lawyer stayed for 15 years in prison) (Chekhov 1889). He also agreed to a bet he couldn't compromise to . Another character in this story is The Lawyer . “The Bet” used The Lawyer's dialogue to reveal his behavior because it shows how patient . “The Bet” written by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1889) used the Lawyer’s and The Banker’s dialogue to reveal their behaviors and character traits because He waits 15 years in jail and he learns how read (Chekhov 1889). He also doesn't accept the money becaused he learned something out of those 15 years he was in jail just for a bet(Chekhov 1889) . They used dialogue to explain the character's behaviors and to show their character traits
Other details in the story also have a similar bearing on Mathilde’s character. For example, the story presents little detail about the party scene beyond the statement that Mathilde is a great “success” (7)—a judgment that shows her ability to shine if given the chance. After she and Loisel accept the fact that the necklace cannot be found, Maupassant includes details about the Parisian streets, about the visits to loan sharks, and about the jewelry shop in order to bring out Mathilde’s sense of honesty and pride as she “heroically” prepares to live her new life of poverty. Thus, in “The Necklace,” Maupassant uses setting to highlight Mathilde’s maladjustment, her needless misfortune, her loss of youth and beauty, and finally her growth as a responsible human being.
It’s a letter from Mme. Forester "Dear Mathilde, I’m really glad that you tell me the truth after that several years but didn’t hope that it could be that dramatic. I know it been hard for you, your life has been difficult so I gave you 3000 francs to you with all of my love. I really not going to give back the necklace though, because it also your fault that you losted my necklace before. Your dear friend, Mme.
Though Anton Chekhov's "The Bet" was written in a different country at a different time, it portrays a timeless theme; greed is a crippling trait of mankind. This message can be seen through the author's use of characterization of both the lawyer and the banker. The banker was a static character; he was greedy from start to finish. The lawyer was a dynamic character and he saw the wrong in his ways and changed them in the end.
The perceived value of money is misconstrued by numerous people. As illustrated in the story, people can look too highly upon money. The banker praises his money and enjoys his wealth deeply, but by the end of the story, the investor luck has changed. Having lost his fortunes, he believes his only chance of surviving in the world is if he holds onto as much money as he can. This desperation causes the banker to fret over the day he has to pay the lawyer two million dollars. The banker absolutely opposes giving up his money; therefore, the banker is willing to kill the lawyer so that the contract is void. This plan shows the banker valued his money above everything else, even another human.
Immediately, Mathilde realises necklace is not on her neck anymore it is lost. They checked the cab, but could not find it. Monsieur follows there step back, but unfortunately he could not find it. They decide to go to the jewelry store and look for similar diamond necklace Mathilde Loisel was wearing. De Maupassant let 's reader know the price of Necklace, “ The price was forty thousand francs. The store will let them have it for thirty-six thousand” ( Maupassant 177 ). Monsieur made some arrangement for the money. He had Eighteen thousand franc which his father gave to him and the rest he had to borrow from other people and promised to pay them as early as possible and with a healthy interest rate. They successfully replace the new necklace and went to Mathilde friend 's house to return it. give to her friend. And start paying up people they loaned money
A common literary device, symbolism is used in this story. Symbolism is when something has a greater meaning within itself. The example of this in the story is the necklace. When looking at necklaces at Madame Forestier she finds one that just jumps out at her. She believes it is everything she wants in life. This is symbolic because it was only a necklace it could not fulfill all of her dreams of a rich high-class life. “She wasn’t at all convinced “No… There’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich woman”. This quote is said before borrowing the necklace, but it is the reason she borrows it from Madame. The necklace is not really going to change who she is in reality. The necklace ...
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
Loisel repaid the necklace together with their sweat and tears. Mathilde didn’t have a choice; she had to change from a vain, ungrateful, material, bored wife, into a hardworking proud and loving wife. She even says, right before she runs into Mme. Forestier, “What would have happened if she had not lost that necklace? Who knows? Who knows? How life is strange and changeful! How little a thing is needed for us to be lost or to be saved!”(39) In that quote I saw 2 things, when she asked herself what would have happened if she didn’t lose the necklace, she doesn’t go into some fairytale about what life she could be living, she just accepts what she is now, even if it’s not the easiest life in the world. At the very end of that quote “How little a thing is needed for us to be lost or to be saved!”(39) The fact that she added “or to be saved!” to her thought, tells me that she realizes that she was vain and unappreciated and that she lacked character, but now she is grateful, even though it was such a terrible thing, she was grateful that she was able to say that she was a better person now, even after everything that happened to her than she ever “dreamed” of being before. Guy de Maupassant certainly described a very difficult hardship for Mathilde in “The Necklace” but in the end, everything that happened to her, made her a much better and stronger woman inside and out. This story teaches a very important lesson, you have no idea what you can do and who you can become, until your chips are down and you’re put between a rock and a hard
In "The Bet," the story discusses a situation that occurred between a banker and a man who make a bet based on capital punishment, but ends with a twist that turns the story completely around. This story, written by Anton Chekhov, begins with a group of men standing and talking at a party and they converse over the topic of capital punishment. The younger man explains that between the death penalty and imprisonment for life, he would choose the second one. The banker makes a bet on the man's option that he would be imprisoned for 15 years in exchange for two million dollars. The only rule that applies is that he cannot leave a minute early from his imprisonment or he will not win the money. The young man accepts and goes to imprisonment for
“The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, and “The Gift of the Magi” by O. Henry have several similarities and differences. Both stories deal with possessions, greed, and giving, each having their own problems and solutions. However, the characters face their situations differently, and lead very different lives.
In The Necklace from Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde had an internal struggle with herself. She mentally had a fierce battle with the financial and physical drawbacks that were placed on her. Since she married into a hard working family of clerks, she "had no dowry, no hopes, no means of becoming known, appreciated, loved, and married by a man rich and distinguished; and she allowed herself to marry a minor official in the Ministry of Public Instruction" (Pg 1). She was beautiful naturally, but Mathilde and her husband suffered through poverty. She was also unhappy with her life.
In “The Necklace,” Mathilde’s internal struggle is with herself. She mentally battled with the physical and financial limitations placed on her, but more with her own soul. She was unhappy with her place in life and could not accept the simplicity of her station, believing it to be truly beneath her. “All those things… tortured her and made her angry. “ Her husband’s blatant acceptance of their place only fueled her frustrations further.