Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparisons
“The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, and “The Gift of the Magi” by O. Henry have several similarities and differences. Both stories deal with possessions, greed, and giving, each having their own problems and solutions. However, the characters face their situations differently, and lead very different lives. “The Necklace” is mainly about greed. The main character wants to fit in and feel beautiful. She wants to impress others and look like she maintains a particular social status. However, her desire to be like everyone else leads to her own self destruction. She borrowed a diamond necklace from a close friend, and lost it. She then worked for ten years to repay her debt, and ended up paying for a real diamond necklace instead of an …show more content…
Both of the main characters have valuable possessions that they give up in the name of love for their partner. Della sells her long, beautiful hair for twenty dollars in addition to the dollar and eighty-seven cents she already had saved. Her husband, Jim, sells his family’s gold watch to buy her a present. Both of the stories make involve sacrifices and giving to another. In “The Necklace,” the main character sacrifices ten years of her life, along with her youth and beauty, to repay the debt of a lost, borrowed necklace. She gives her friend a real diamond necklace, and also gives up her freedom to spend money and live the “high-life.” In “The Gift of the Magi,” the main characters sacrifice their most valuable possession for the other. They gave up their precious asset to buy a meaningful gift for Christmas. After reading “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, the reader learns that pride can destroy a person. The main character is very prideful, and feels that she is far above her circumstances, and her husband. She is unhappy with the life she lives, and despises that she is forced to live by her common birth. This shows the reader that a person should be happy with what they own. The main character is also greedy and unsatisfied. She constantly yearns for more than she has, and her greed led to her debt and
In Guy de Maupassant’s The Necklace (1884), we are shown what happens when people are not grateful for the circumstances they do have. We meet Mathilde Loisel, a selfish, conceited and ungrateful wife to M. Loisel. M. Loisel is not rich, but he does everything in his power to bless his wife, Mathilde, with material things to try and make her happy. What he is unaware of is the toils and trouble that awaits him for bending over backwards for Mathilde. Mathilde is always unhappy where she feels destiny has placed her unjustly. She, in the end, learns the trouble of her ways and thoughts, and becomes the essence of what she told herself she has been given – poor. Mathilde must become humble in order to live her life without fear of being
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
"The Necklace" by Guy De Maupassant, and "A&P" by John Updike were written in two different centuries by two authors of very different backgrounds. However, each story expresses very similar views about women. The women in these stories are self-centered creatures who control men with their sexuality, and end up damaging the men's life.
They worked hard in trying to find it but didn’t have any luck. Before telling Madame Forestier they ask a couple friends to borrow money to buy a replica they can return the necklace “Loisel had eighteen thousand francs which his father had left. He would have to borrow the rest. And which he did,…"(Maupassant, 177). Giving the necklace back to the owner the couple worked ten years of their life to pay back their debt that they had owed. Now that their dues are done Madame Loisel sees Madame Forestier and goes to tell her the truth about what really happened to he necklace only to find out that the necklace was a fake. The story uses symbolism throughout. The necklace symbolizes appearance vs. Reality. Although, the necklace was beautiful in reality is was cheap and fake but, it made Madame Loisel feel rich. The theme is greed, materialism, and honesty. Throughout the story she wasn’t satisfied with what she had in her life until she received that necklace, not even when her husband did the things she wanted. However, if she had been honest and let Madame Forestier know what actually happened to the necklace her may have not been
Ten years of suffering is the cost of having pleasure for only one night! In “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant presents Mathilde Loisel, an attractive, charming but vacuous and selfish middle class lady transforms to selfness, poor, satisfied and hard-working lady. Even though, Mathidle owns a comfortable home and married to a faithful and kind husband, Monsieur Loisel, who seeks her happiness and satisfaction; she was ungrateful to the things that she had been given, because her greed and desire of wealth had captured her thoughts and blurred the real meaning of happiness in her perspective. Mathidle spends most of her time surfing in her day dreams of being wealthy and suffering from accepting the reality, because her imagination was more than she could not afford. One day Mathidle’s husband brought his wife an invitation for a fancy party, but as a result of their low income, Mathidle’s was ashamed to wear flowers as decoration, so she decided to borrow an expensive looking necklace from a friend of her, Madame Forestier. After attending the fabulous party and spending a memorable great time looking stunningly beautiful, Mathidle discovers that she had lost the expensive necklace that she borrowed, so she decides to buy a similar copy of the necklace to her friend after loaning an enormous amount of money and narrowing the house outcome. The author surprises his readers with a perfectly detailed twist at the end of the story. Losing the necklace was a turning point in Mathidle’s life and the best thing that ever happened to her.
Furthermore, the lifestyle both women want ends up in disaster however, one ends in death while the other in hard labor. In "The Necklace", the wife ends up losing her friend’s expensive necklace which causes her to work hard to earn enough money to pay of a new one. Due to all the work she loses her beauty. In contrast, whereas in "The Jewels" the constant attendance of the opera house during the winter causes her to die of inflammation which resulted a deep sorrow towards the husband. Both wife’s lived life differently. Both tries to find the best way to fulfill their desire for the good
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
The irony of the stories ending is even though their gifts was not wise because they both cannot use them but they sacrificed for each other the greatest treasures of their house, which is their true love for each other, making it the wisest. They are the Magi.
The message to value more important things in order to have a wisely spent life is demonstrated very well through literary devices in “The Necklace”, by Guy de Maupassant. Madame undergoes an ironic moment in life as she learns what is worth valuing. She is a very greedy woman who only cares about herself. The reader would never think of her as the person to do work, but that thought changes as she misplaces what she thinks of as a valuable item. If Madame just learned how to live life in a way that will not make her upset and to value things that are valuable towards life instead of expenses, she will be better off. But this is how Madame views her life, while others take notice of the significance in their lives. Values are different towards people across the world, and Guy de Maupassant defines that in his short story, “The Necklace”.
The necklace portrays selfishness through the way in which Mathilde acts to obtain the necklace. Mathilde’s husband tries to surprise her and brings home an invitation to a fancy ball. He assumes she will be ecstatic, but she is not. She throws the invitation on the table and questions, “What do you want me to do with that?” (de Maupassant 1133). Her husband explains how difficult it was for him to receive the invitation, and still it is not enough. She looks at him and impatiently says, “And what do you want me to put on my back?” (de Maupassant 1133). Even though her husband brings home a sentimental gift, she only thinks of the things she does not have. Later, Mathilde’s husband suggests she goes to her close friend’s house to
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
“The Necklace”, narrated by Guy de Maupassant in 3rd person omniscient, focuses the story around Mathilde Loisel who is middle class, and her dreams of fame and fortune. The story is set in 19th century France. One day, Mathilde’s husband brings home an invitation to a fancy ball for Mathilde; to his surprise Mathilde throws a fit because she doesn’t have a dress or jewelry to wear to the ball. M. Loisel gets her the beautifully expensive dress she desires and Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from Mme. Forestier, a rich acquaintance of Mathilde. Mathilde goes to the ball and has a night she’s dreamed of, until she gets home from the ball at 4 A.M. to find
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
The “Gift of the Magi”, by O. Henry, is a short story that unfolds in an unanticipated and remarkable way that gently tugs the reader in which makes them want to continue reading. The story is about two characters named Della and Jim. For Christmas, Della cuts her hair to sell for money to buy Jim a chain for his watch while Jim sells his watch to buy Della some fancy combs. They both couldn’t use each other's gifts properly by reason of them sacrificing what they loved likewise finding delight in giving - what is foolish in the head, may be wise for the heart.
Wanting more and better is one of the quality that we all have. In the stories “The Necklace” and “The Gift of the Magi”, both writers illustrate the consequences of greed. One would wonder if people do fine much happiness through their search for material? Perhaps greed does make one’s happy at times, but because of greed people bury themselves in the bottomless pit of pain and suffering. A dust material such as a shiny watch fob or a sparkling necklace get the fake adoration that one seeks. In the end the price that is paid to obtain something materialistic is too much. “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant and “The Gift of the Magi” by O Henry develop