Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Priestley's ideas in an inspector calls
Priestley's ideas in an inspector calls
Introduction to sexual harassment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Priestley's ideas in an inspector calls
“I didn't ask for anything in return.” How far do you agree that
Gerald is not guilty of exploits Daisy Renton ??
At the beginning of Gerald’s and Daisy relationship, Gerald’s actions towards Daisy Renton throughout the play were not used against her or to exploit the young lady, instead to be a genuine and kind young gentleman helping somebody being sexually harassed by some large older men. However, at times the reader could argue that some of Gerald’s involvements with her were often very suspicious as it seemed the friendship between the two grew into something more intimate. The reasonings for my argument are explained throughout this essay.
Priestly presents Gerald’s character as an over worked young man. At the beginning
…show more content…
of Daisy and Gerald’s relationship he does not exploit Daisy in anyway instead he acts as a true gentleman towards someone in danger. This is because when a hard working business man finishes a long days work he may be entitled to a drink at a bar of his choose and in this case, The Palace Bar which is filled with women of the town. Although, we question this the reader accepts this and it almost seems perfectly reasonable. Gerald takes a seat with his drink, he harshly judges the women except when he spots a beautiful young girl with soft brown hair, big dark eyes and was overall a very pretty girl. This girl was being harassed, physically tormented by a large, strong man and immediately acts on the issue. Gerald doing this then creates him to be the hero of the day, the intimidated girl is gratefully thankful despite being in destress and filled with anxiety after her encounter. He settles her by buying her a drink, giving her the opportunity to talk and calm herself down. Daisy began to gain her confidence back he told her ‘if you don't want any more of that sort of thing, you better let me take you out.’ Gerald offered a warm small room around the area for Daisy to recover. Although, Gerald seemed suspicious and throughout the play the reader seemed to question his decisions and many would argue his behaviour was all out of pure kindness and for no other reason. However, Priestly creates an uncertainty through Gerald as he does also exploits and takes advantage of Daisy with her extremely fragile egoism and is shown occasionally throughout the book.
At the beginning when they first meet you could argue that Gerald was using this gorgeous young women for other reasons not including how he felt about her safety. A pretty girl in the bar filled with women of the town including herself he may have wanted something in return when thinking of helping Miss Renton. The reader however knows that Gerald received what he was wanting from her the whole time as he admits and states that he had slept with her. However, he also admitted the two fell in love, intimately and emotionally. Priestly suggests that Gerald used Daisy for entertainment and action while Sheila was less interesting who soon became almost fed up of the relationship.
To conclude I believe the reader has sympathy for Gerald as his fiancé is uninterested and when explaining to the inspector and the Birling family his reaction towards the situation caused him to almost break down completely. However, I feel ambivalent to a certain degree and I agree with the statement that was proposed by Gerald. Except at moments in time I
believe
The story “Catch a Killer,” was written by George Woods. It is a story about three main characters, Lieutenant Tawney who is a B.C.I. man, Andrew Morgan who leaves his house and goes to Batten’s house, and Craig Corso who is a mysterious man. Their behaviors, personalities, actions, and their thoughts affect the story “Catch a Killer”.
it will create. He makes a toast to the couple and to the fact that
she needed more money. So she said to him give me 25/6 because of that
A Comparison of Characters of Mr. Birling and Inspector Goole in J.B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls
J.B. Priestley's Motives Behind An Inspector Calls J.B. Priestley was born in Bradford, Yorkshire in 1894. His mother
In act 1, while Arthur Birling was giving advice to Eric and Gerald, an Inspector gives them a visit to investigate a young working-class girl’s suicidal death. This is very important because later on, we find out how J. B. Priestley has linked the girl’s death to all the Birling family members.
These questions prove that Gertrude is much more complex than the reader thinks initially. However, her character in the play is an enigma, shallow in depth. Gertrude seems to put on a facade of ignorance. She must protect her own interests.
At the start the playwright creates slight allusions that produce tension; Sheila wondered ‘half seriously what had happened to Gerald previous summer when Gerald never went near Sheila’. Lady Croft and Sir George have not come to the engagement feast and Eric is behaving quite anxiously. Eric’s strange behaviour on the cheerful occasion creates trepidation and foreshadows a rather surprising event which interests the audience.
Throughout the majority of “Othello”, “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” and “The Great Gatsby”, Shakespeare, Lawrence and Fitzgerald seem to have this common focus on the changes in society in terms of relationships. It appears that each text has a major event in which the dynamics of the relationships change due to some aspect in society in which they are set. Lawrence’s “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” is pervaded by the idea that relationships between classes are highly influenced negatively by society. Connie is having this very sexual and passionate relationship with her gamekeeper Oliver Mellors, who is of a lower status to her. To many reader’s surprise, Mellors is a man who, as one critic quotes, “remains impervious to the pettiness and conventional society” suggesting this to be a reason for Connie and Mellors relationship to be so strong compared to that of, for instance, Othello and Desdemona and Daisy, Tom and Gatsby’s relationships.
In the time of William Shakespeare where courtship and romance were often overshadowed by the need to marry for social betterment and to ensure inheritance, emerges a couple from Much Ado About Nothing, Hero and Claudio, who must not only grow as a couple, who faces deception and slander, but as individuals. Out of the couple, Claudio, a brave soldier respected by some of the highest ranked men during his time, Prince Don Pedro and the Governor of Messina, Leonato, has the most growing to do. Throughout the play, Claudio’s transformation from an immature, love-struck boy who believes gossip and allows himself to easily be manipulated is seen when he blossoms into a mature young man who admits to his mistakes and actually has the capacity to love the girl he has longed for.
Fitzgerald comments on the changing role and attitudes of women of the 1920s in America. He shows this through the characters Daisy and Jordan. Daisy and Jordan both drink, smoke and drive, and associate freely with men. Daisy's flirtatiousness is an example of this, along with her drunken state in the first chapter when she says 'I'm p-paralysed with happiness'. Daisy also shows the attitude Fitzgerald felt was common in this society, when talking about her daughter.
In the story The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the role of the female characters Daisy, Jordan and Myrtle find themselves in conflict with society’s expectations of them. However, they each negotiate the conflict and resolve it. By examining Daisy, Jordan and Myrtle’s roles, one can contemplate how they went about resolving the issue.
Daisy and Jordan are members of the elite class and are often presented as motionless, sitting or lying down, and when they do move it is leisurely. On the other hand, Myrtle is a member of the lower class and is depicted as annoyingly full of energy. During their journey to Tom and Daisy’s apartment, Daisy rapidly states “I’m going to make a list of all the things I’ve got to get. A massage and a wave and a collar for the dog and one of those cute little ashtrays where you touch a spring, and a wreath with a black silk bow for mother’s grave that’ll last all summer” (Fitzgerald, page 40). Myrtle’s abundance of energy is induced by her obsession with obtaining wealth. Despite drastic differences in how females are depicted based on their differences in wealth, both Daisy and Myrtle are treated as inferior to their husbands. This patriarchal view influences a feminist
Throughout Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby,” the role of women can be examined to demonstrate anti-feminism. Initially, Daisy is viewed as an innocent, loving character, but once her true motives are revealed, it is clear that she is very corrupt, desiring only money and power. This is used to show the stereotypical female who lives under the man for his possessions, and lacks the self-respect to stand against the opposite gender. She is not the only female to act like this, there are many, but her case is the most important because it directly influences all of the main characters. Gatsby is also portrayed as a stereotype: the boy who wants his true love and will do anything and everything to get her, even be accused of murder. Once each character
I aim to show how the “human” relationships in the play reflect real life relationships within Shakespeare’s own society (as well as his future audience), for which his plays were written and performed. Ferdinand and Miranda’s type of relationship shows Shakespeare’s ideas about true love, recognising not just the emotional side of love, but the physical nature too. Miranda promises Ferdinand “The jewel in my dower” which is her virginity, a prized thing in Jacobean times. This knowledge would have been known by Shakespeare’s audience, and knowing this helps us to understand Prospero’s protection of his daughter from Caliban. Ferdinand is asked not to have lustful thoughts about Miranda as “Sour-eyed disdain and discord shall bestrew the union of your bed with weeds so loathly that you shall hate it both” meaning that sex before marriage will poison the lovers’ marriage bed so that they will both grow to loathe it.