Cesar Chavez Research Paper

A man of the unions, a man of democracy. Cesar Chavez gained a prominent reputation throughout his illustrious lifetime. From campaigning for farmer rights to encouraging individual involvement in the government, passion and resilience remained with Chavez throughout these times. Cesar Chavez utilized one key component throughout his strives: words. He spoke numerous, profound opinions of inspiration and vitality. Out of all, one quote stood out: “We don’t need perfect political systems; we need perfect participation.” This statement elucidated the reality of American society; that a handful of individuals, cannot speak for all.
In the United States currently, I agree that our political structures are defective; however, certain specifications

do not necessarily require adjustments. The outmoded, inefficient system of the Electoral College impedes the United States’ ability of equality; this can change. The complete obliteration of corruption among politicians cannot. Essentially, our political systems will never be impeccable. Politicians will occasionally associate in scandals and controversies; however, these issues are a matter of human nature. Humans are not perfectionists; what one believes is the right thing to do would become reality. Confidence applies to a different aspect as well: humans’ works. What one or many propose would receive opposition diplomatically or physically; this is dignity within humans. However, as a nation, we benightedly believe our political organizations always have to be exemplary. Where any scandal or demagogue would lure citizens away from participation. As a result, Americans discourage from vocalizing their opinions and instead, allow others to participate. Without expression, the fight for change could be obstructed, or even worsened. Whether it is a protest or a simple vote, Americans need to utilize free speech to change our nation. Citizens have the influence to change the way of life available anytime.
As for participation, this aspect requires perfection in society. When Chavez rallied for farmer’s rights, he displayed resilience and determination among his colleagues. He continued to protest through starvation, opposition, and much more. His group presented the suffering of farm workers to the nation. This is participation; by voicing one’s discrepancies, it encourages others to join the conflict for resolution. Change transitions to controversy and pressure if others see the harsh reality of the situation. Without it, everyone would disregard the conflicts. Which is why perfect political systems are irrelevant. If the working population continues to protest their sufferings, then the pressure and publicity would change the government. No matter what party, not all would agree with the ideas; and thereby raising the voice of suffering, resilient people.
I vehemently agree with Cesar Chavez’s words of contribution. The political systems of the United States can never reach perfection; all have their strengths and vulnerabilities. Participation, on the other hand, is an antithesis: desired to be flawless to cause change. This change would require numerous American citizens to expose their hidden desires; to fight the robust generation to transition this nation. Citizens are the panacea, not the nobility.