Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the old testament
Analysis of the old testament
Analysis of the old testament
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the old testament
In recent years there have been several investigations and endeavors to locate many of the central figures of the old testament in historical records and documents. However, these investigations have failed to produce any concrete evidence. Anthony R. Ceresko’s, Introduction to the Old Testament confronts this challenge. With no historical or analytical evidence of the locations of many places mention in the Old Testament, it can be hard to determine how these stories should be most accuracy interpreted. To better interpret the books of the Old Testament many scholars look as far back as the early Israelite people and the values held dear in their society. There are also scholars who interpret the Old Testament through the first five books …show more content…
Ceresko first makes the point that the ancestors of Israel where originally various tribes of individuals seeking protection from socially and economically oppressive regimes. This protection came largely from the environment these peasants, sheep and goat herders, itinerant metal works, renegade priests, and mercenaries migrated into; the highlands of Can ‘nan, offered protection from outside invaders. The protection of the hills gave the inhabitants a sense of invincibility or as they perceived it, “God’s chosen people”, and “the promised land”. Many scholars suspect this could be the origin of these two fundamental ideas of the Bible. These scholars also believe this is not the only historical interpretation the people of Israeli had in the Old Testament. They suggest stories of Abram joining forces with other rulers to defeat oppressive regimes, can symbolize the different tribes of ancestors forming alliances to fight the systems which oppressed them. Other examples of historical interpretations of the Bible occur in the book of Leviticus, which depicts the ways an individual should conduct him or herself. The scholar’s suspect the virtues of main characters in the Bible are the traits various tribes valued. The chapter …show more content…
He does this by examining the Pentateuch, the Greek translation of the Torah. Ceresko also makes an important note that it wasn’t until the Renaissance that a critical approach to analyzing the Bible was considered. Richard Simon, a French Catholic priest, was one of the first to question the sole authorship of the Pentateuch, and to argue it is in fact a compilation of diverse documents. His proof is the inconsistency between books of the Old Testament like in Genesis 2:4b-25 and Genesis 1:1-2:4a which provide contradictions within creation. This evidence leads to the interpretation that books of the Old Testament were written by various people and not solely by Moses. Upon closer examination scholars have been able to find four different sources of the Pentateuch. These sources are split by regions, voice, and finally narrative or legislative literature. The narratives tell the stories of God and the early Israelite people, while legislative literature says how people should conduct themselves. These four sources are investigated more closely in chapter
It is the reader and his or her interpretive community who attempts to impose a unified reading on a given text. Such readers may, and probably will, claim that the unity they find is in the text, but this claim is only a mask for the creative process actually going on. Even the most carefully designed text can not be unified; only the reader's attempted taming of it. Therefore, an attempt to use seams and shifts in the biblical text to discover its textual precursors is based on a fundamentally faulty assumption that one might recover a stage of the text that lacked such fractures (Carr 23-4).
The Bible: The Old Testament. The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed. Sarah Lawall et al. Vol 1. 7th ed. New York: Norton, 1999. 47-97.
The Old Testament and the Bible itself has been studied extensively for centuries. Archeologists and Scholars have labored and pondered over texts trying to decipher its clues. It does not matter how many times the Old Testament has been studied there will always be something new to learn about it or the history surrounding it. In the book Reading the Old Testament: an Introduction, the author Lawrence Boadt presents us with a few different authors of the Old Testament that used different names for God and had a unique insight into the texts. These four sources are titled P for priests, E for Elohim, J for Jehovah, and Y for Yahweh (95). These four unique sources help us realize that there is more than one author of the Pentateuch. These authors took the text and adapted for their culture. This independent source is used by scholars to help gain insight into what was behind the texts of the bible so we are not left with an incomplete picture of what went into the creation of the bible. Julius Wellhausen used these four sources to publish a book to able us to better understand the sources and to give it credibility with the Protestant scholars at the time (Boadt 94). These sources that is independent of the bible as in the DVD Who Wrote the Bible? and the Nova website aide in shedding light on the history that surrounded the writers who wrote the text and what inspired them to write it in the first place. The DVD shows the discovery of The Dead Sea Scrolls and the extensive history of the texts and all its sources in an effort to try to find exactly who wrote the bible (Who Wrote). These scrolls have aided scholars immensely by giving us some of the oldest known manuscripts of the bible in the world today. It shows that the bible w...
Modern scholars believe that the Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, was composed by four or five writers between 1000 to 400 BCE based on much older traditions. The New Testament was composed by a variety of writers between 60 to 110 CE. The contents of the New Testament were formalized by Athanasius of Alexandria in 367 CE, and finally canonized in 382 CE (Geisler and
1996. “Sacrifices and Offerings in Ancient Israel” in Community, Identity, and Ideology: Social Science approach to the Hebrew Bible., ed. Charles E. Carter.
The Hebrew Bible, better known as the Old Testament, is a collection of tomes that form part of the Biblical canon. Many scholars around the world do not think that a single author wrote the books contained in the Hebrew Bible, but rather that it represents centuries of stories frequently compiled after the events they describe . The stories were created with visions for the future, in order to allow audiences insight into communities and beliefs that were common thought during their era. The stories responded to the issues and problems of their time, but also addressed contemporary climates. While the stories themselves may not be true, they convey truth without needing literal readings. For example, the creation stories in Genesis, portray God as creating the universe, and while this is considered as not ‘literally true’; the stories communicate theological truths about mankind’s relationship with God through the eyes of Hebrew writers .
In the video “Who Wrote the Bible? Act III: Holy Words”, arguments are made about the authorship of the Pentateuch. It was believed in the beginning that the five books of Moses were authored by Moses himself. As years past, scholars began to doubt the truthfulness of this ideal. One of the first arguments was how
Collins, John J. A Short Introduction to the Hebrew Scriptures. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.
Stuart has authored commentaries and articles in journals and magazines. The authors acknowledge that many books have been written on this topic. Their goal is to be unique by focusing on different types of literature (genres) so their readers will understand how to properly interpret them in the context they were written. This review will examine the principles the authors use to interpret the Bible. The review will summarize the book, followed by a critique, and a conclusion.
LaSor, W., Hubbard, D., Bush, F., & Allen, L. (1996). Old Testament survey: The message, form, and background of the Old Testament (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans
It is in the Book of Deuteronomy that claims, Moses wrote the Pentateuch, and has the support of both Jesus Christ and the apostles, making the Pentateuch classified as “holy scripture”. This authentication from Jesus and the apostles makes it challenging for those opposing Mosaic authorship, due to the fact that believers of the New Testament view all that resides inside as the full truth, making it stand on the bases of the Old Testament, and if the Old Testament is not written by Moses, then the entire legitimacy of the Bible would stand in
Arragel, Moses, A. Paz Y Meliá, Julián Paz, and Alba, Jacobo Stuart Fitz-James Y Falcó. Bible (Old Testament). Madrid: Priv. Print. for Presentation to the Members of the Roxburghe Club, 1918. Print.
Levine, Amy –Jill and Douglas Knight. The Meaning of the Bible: What Jewish and Christian Old Testament Can Teach Us. New York: HarperOne, 2011
This is what I was taught in Sunday school and even Jesus and Paul referred to Moses as the giver of the Law. However, after this week’s study, I have come to understand the greater evidence in multi-authorship and compilation of the Pentateuch. However, the biggest question that remains, when was the Torah compiled? Alexander does an excellent job explaining what is known and not known. I have to agree that the exile to Babylon makes since when you look at Genesis through Kings being one compilation. However, despite not knowing the exact date, the most helpful resource Alexander offers to the discussion is the purpose the Pentateuch. He traces the Garden of Eden through the Pentateuch to point out the great activity of God from the beginning. God is bringing humanity back to a garden city. Specifically, Alexander