Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book banning in schools
Book banning in schools
Book banning in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book banning in schools
For nine years, from 2000 to 2009 the top challenged book included the entire Harry Potter series. Books have been banned by schools, governments, and libraries since the beginning of time in different places all around the world. Starting in 1982, Book Banning Week was created to try to bring up the importance of this form of censorship. Books are unjustly banned when in reality, students should self-censor their reading, the First Amendment should protect books against this, and these books are important teaching materials.
Students should make their own choices and should be able to self-censor their reading. Older-aged students are exposed to most of the controversial topics discussed in these books that are commonly banned. The students
…show more content…
around high school age are accustomed to the swearing and can handle the controversial topics included. Another key point is that for each of the banned books, individuals disagree with it, but that does not give them the right to take the option to take it away from everyone. An example of the protection against this is in the court case of West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S., at 642, “Local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to ‘prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.’” Also, according to the Library Bill of Rights, it is the responsibility of the library to provide books for the interest, information, and enlightenment of all people, and should present all the points of view on current or historical issues. IMportant to realize, even with the bans on books in schools, students can still get the books from other sources like public libraries and book stores. There are always other options, so the very point of banning is unnecessary. Students making their own choices on their own reading materials is part of what the First Amendment protects. The First Amendment protects book titles against being banned by the matter of personal opinion. 9 out of 10 books are banned by parents. This means that parents are the ones to bring up the initial complaints on books to the school board. The First Amendment guarantees the right not only to speak freely, but also to read and write any style of novels that the author wishes to create. Many court cases have enforced this cause. In the First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 783 (1978), it explains, “The First Amendment rights of students may be directly and sharply implicated by the removal of books from the shelves of a school library. Our precedents have focused ‘not only on the role of the First Amendment in fostering individual self-expression, but also on its role in affording the public access to discussion, debate, and the dissemination of information and ideas.’” Other cases include similar thoughts like, “A school library, no less than any other public library, is ‘a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty.’” according to the Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142 (1966) (opinion of Fortas, J.). The Keyishian v. Board of Regents,385 U.S. 589 (1967) case also states that, “Students must always remain free to inquire, to study and to evaluate, to gain new maturity and understanding.” The personal opinions of these few people cause learning materials to be taken away from classrooms and lesson plans. The books are learning materials for classes that teach important lessons.
Books are written with the purpose of pushing the boundaries and common ways of thinking. In addition, classic books are banned frequently, because the reason they are made into classics is that they challenge the common thought of the time. Examples of these banned books include One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Ulysses, The Catcher in the Rye, and To Kill a Mockingbird --all wonderful teachers of valuable life lessons. More compelling evidence says that teachers have been fired for teaching about books that are banned in particular schools. According to the National Council of Teachers of English, teachers purposefully choose books by many factors including literary quality, appropriateness, usefulness, uniqueness, and breadth of coverage. Teachers are aware of what the books messages are, and help students see the different perspectives presented--it is the student's decision to accept or reject the ideas the book looks at. These important lessons and morals taught in books are still challenged and cause some truly brilliant books to be banned.
Even with these reasons, some reasons to ban books still exist; for example, the books are inappropriate for young children, they can teach children bad habits, and they can go against religious groups. While these points may be true, the reasons for not banning books is stronger as they are educational tools that are beneficial to the learning experiences that students need. Also, these books do not necessarily teach children bad habits, because they can teach students of all ages to learn from mistakes others made and do not repeat
them. Student self-censoring, the First Amendment, and being important teaching materials should prevent books from becoming banned, but this still is a problem waiting to be solved today. The reality is that books are banned and challenged all the time, and the only way to help stop this is to read the books and decide for yourself. Try participating in Banned Books Week next time, and support the freedom to read.
There are multiple reasons why a book can be banned or challenged. Book banning causes the removal of materials in schools and libraries due to “inappropriate” content. The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold, was banned due to sexual content and language.
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
Foerstel, Herbert N. Banned in the U.S.A.: a Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994. Print.
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many other ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries. There are four motivational factors that may lie behind a censor’s actions. Those factors include family values, religion, political views, and minority rights.... ... middle of paper ... ...2003.
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
Censorship/banning of certain books help protect children from the evil ways of the world that they should not see until an older, more mature age. Books with cruel language and mature thoughts and circumstances should only be read by teen children or young adults. At a more mature age students are more likely to be able to comprehend the content within the book. As well as a lower chance of the students being frightened by the crude language and activities found within the text than a younger child might be. Young children are impressionable and these types of books may leave unpleasant thoughts and influence behaviors now as well as the futures of the children. The banning of books such as The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger and others as well, should only be banned up to eighth grade in school.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Only parents and teachers should ban books all over the world, not whole communities. Communities as a whole can change what parents’ children are reading and learning. Random community members should not be allowed to vote because they do not know what is best for the children at schools. Teachers and parents argue about it, but it will come to a decision. Parents and teachers are the only people allowed to ban books in communities all over the
The discussion and knowledge of new, controversial, and necessary subjects is restricted among students due to censorship. Student access to books on topics such as self-harm, sexual orientation, depression, religion, etc. are limited because of censorship. These topics may not be appropriate for all individuals, but these books have the power to save lives, change lives, and awaken stud...
As it is inevitable that children will grow up to be exposed to the world's evils, which are shown in novels like Fahrenheit 451, teaching the context and meaning of those evils in a learning environment allows for more of a educated understanding and a fuller grasp on the issues within. By reading controversial novels in schools, students in middle and high school will benefit tremendously by being exposed to them in a learning environment. Although teachers and parents have control as to what the students are exposed to at a young age, Fahrenheit 451 should not be banned from middle and high schools as it depicts the effects of censorship on a dystopian society through use of controversial material which doubles as
Censorship in Schools There has recently been a renewed interest and passion in the issue of censorship. In the realm of the censorship of books in schools alone, several hundred cases have surfaced each year for nearly the past decade. Controversies over which books to include in the high school English curriculum present a clash of values between teachers, school systems, and parents over what is appropriate for and meaningful to students. It is important to strike a balance between English that is meaningful to students by relating to their lives and representing diversity and satisfying worries about the appropriateness of what is read.
Book banning deprives people of the opportunity to think, question, and explore. Books, especially ones that have been banned, have themes that make people think. Some of the most controversial topics have been presented as a theme in a book. Books try to help us understand the reality that is our everyday life and urge us to question the “normal” things in society.
Only if we had all books in the library that would be cool. Have you ever went to your school's library trying to find Harry Potter to end up not getting it because it’s banned. There are very little reasons books should be banned. Parents also need to calm down when it comes to banning books and what there child reads. Why we need to keep these books in schools.