Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Polygamy and its effects research papers
Polygamy research introduction
Polygamy and its effects research papers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Polygamy and its effects research papers
One of the many groups that found interesting was the cenogamous Oneida community. I was most surprised to learn that there could be more than one man and more than one woman in the marriage. I had heard of polygamy where there is one man and more than one woman. It was also interesting to learn that in cenogamy not all the spouses know about each other.
I believe this was surprising for me because I have never encountered families like these. I have never met anyone who had more than one spouse. I attribute this mostly to my religion. I am Catholic and in the Catholic Church we believe that is one man and one woman form a marriage. Another factor that I believe contributes to my astonishment of these types of communities is my culture. My culture and religion are linked and therefore both suggest that a man should not have more than one wife and that a marriage is made of only two people not multiple people.
…show more content…
Although very different there are some similarities that I see with my family.
First, the more people who make up their family the more help there is emotionally, financially, and domestically. For example, my maternal grandparents had a total of ten children, and although everyone was not married to each other, having so many people allows for more help for the family. Emotionally my mother and her siblings had each other to talk to or get emotional support from. Cenogamist families can lean on each other in time of hardships just like my mother and her siblings did as young children and even know as adults. Financially, my grandfather would take the boys to work to produce more crops to sell so that he could make more money. In a cenogamist family there are more people to work and bring home money to support the family and maintain a stable way of living. Domestically, my mother and her siblings would have daily chores and things around the home they had to do. Cenogamist families would also share the responsibilities of household work among
themselves. Another similarity between cenogamist families and my family is that both believe and practice what we do because of religious beliefs. We may not have the same belief system, but basing actions off of religious beliefs make us similar. As I mentioned before, my religious and cultural beliefs are what, in my opinion, caused me to be surprised with a community such as the Oneida community. I am sure that to the Oneida community, my customs and beliefs are different and strange to them because they have been raised to believe certain things, just like I have. A difference that I saw was the view that the Oneida community has on monogamous marriages. In this community monogamous marriages are considered to be a selfish type of love. They believe that it was natural for all men and women to love each other. In my family, culture, and religion we do not believe monogamy as being a selfish love, but rather as a one true love. I have grown up believing that there is one person out there for me that I will marry and spend my life with. The reasons and process for having children is another difference that I thought to be interesting. The Oneida community must make a formal application and follow a process in order to become parents. In my culture, no such process exists, if a couple wants to become parents then are free to do so when they want without having to be assessed by anyone. My grandparents extended their family because they wanted to have a big family to surround themselves. In the end, I find it hard to judge cenogamist families. After learning about many different groups I have realized that every culture and group is different from the next. Each group sees their customs and norms as the correct way of living. But in reality there is not one way to correctly live. Every group believes something different and I have learned to appreciate these differences. Although the culture is different it does not give the right for one culture to be disrespect to another. Just how I would like for others to respect my family and my culture, I am willing to be open-minded about new families and groups that I might encounter in my future.
This is ironic because the anti-polygamists believed in the Bible, but not polygamy, one of its teachings. Many of God’s righteous followers in the Old Testament practiced polygamy. Abraham married Hagar, Sarai’s handmaiden (Genesis 16:1-3). Jacob was married to Leah, Rachel, Billah, and Zilpha, all at the same time.
One custom of Umuofia that would be very different from Western culture is Polygamy, the practice of having many wives. This custom is practiced in the connected nine villages of Umuofia. In fact, a man's wealth is partially measured by the number of wives he has. A wealthy man described in Things Fall Apart, had nine wives and thirty children. Okonkwo had three wives and eight children.
2. Coontz talks a lot about how people use to define family, not too long ago did family just start to mean a married couple and their kids. Family use to mean many different things back in the day: a large kinship group in which they derived their claims and property, as the European nobility described it, or middle class Europeans and North Americans described
Then the article connects to how fraternal polyandry is similar to nineteenth century marriage in England. Even though they are similar, Tibetan “believe that in this way fraternal polyandry reduces risk of fission, monogamous marriage among brother need to necessarily precipitate the division of family estate” (“When Brothers Share a Wife”). Then the article goes into how the author of this article, Melvyn C. Goldstein, asked the Tibetan people on why they marry this way. Some said it makes the family more stable and other said that is keeps conflict from affecting
What's important to note is that family, or even the concept of family itself, doesn't appear in any of those ideals. Holmes and Holmes (2002) observed that “The family reunions of yesterday are now rare, and when they occur they are often a source of stress.” (p. 19) That quote solidifies one reason why family interaction today is: “It’s just too stressful, so we avoid it. Where does marriage fit into our culture of individuals?
Up until the 1960s, no one questioned the idea that the traditional family was the cornerstone of American society and essential to its very survival. A traditional family was a man and a woman, married to each other, who had children together and reared them in a community full of other such families. A family thirty plus years ago, meant Mom, Dad, the kids, and on holidays, Grandpa, Grandma, aunts, cousins, and in-laws. In those days, a man and a woman didn't just move into an apartment and live together. Occasionally it would occur, but the practice was not common, and in small town America it almost never happened.
Fletcher-Stack, Peggy. “Polygamy: Not as Rare as You May Think.” Beliefnet. Beliefnet, Inc., 2011. Web. 19 Dec. 2011. .
Polygamy is considered illegal in the United States, which would make it a deviant practice. That fact is on the bottom burner for me when considering this situation. Forcing someone to theoretically spend the rest of their life with someone not of their choosing is definitely out of the norm in my opinion. On to...
They think that management time in a large family is easy. People believe that a large family which have a lots children could help save money from day care and children tutoring and keeping children safe because siblings could be friend with each other better than with outsider
"A family is a small social group of people related by ancestry or affection, who share common values and goals, who may live together in the same dwelling, and who may participate in the bearing and raising of children. They have a physical or emotional connection with each other that is ongoing" (Vissing, 2011) and is the foundation of all societies. They can be formed by a grouping of father-mother-children or even more complicated combination of relatives. In the primary stage of family life in the United States, everyone from every generation lived together in one house. Subsequently, the idea of traditional family evolved and a married couple with children is at present, often called the traditional family. There are many types of families; however, this paper will focus on the traditional family. It will describe how the functionalist perspective, conflict perspective, and the interactionism theory apply to the sociological institution known as a family. It will explain some of the similarities and differences between the sociological theories in regards to families and how they affect the family members.
Although what we were told by God, in many primitive civilizations marriage was primarily industrial. During early times husband and wife were not much together; they did not even eat together very often.(The Marriage Institution 1). Their marriages were always planned by their parents and in some cases brides were bought. Polygamy was also frequent in the early history of marriage. Although, as civilization progressed monogamy became the idealistic goal of human sex evolution.(The Marriage Institution 6). In addition, as civilization advanced, marriage became more seriously regarded and the wedding ceremony became recurrent. The marriage ceremony grew out of the fact that marriage was originally a community affair and also primitive man had no records, so the marriage had to be witnessed by many people.
Out of the numerous commodities and resources that are scarce on the planet in which we inhabit a family, or even a family system, can never be parallel to even an iota of them. This is due to the fact that everyone, no matter what age at what time period of their life, has a family. That family may not be the cookie cutter family that society imposes on the media world. People develop without knowing their family, people create new families of their own, or they can even find something or someone to call family because of this family will never be scarce. Family is an objective concept to every single person and the definition varies significantly from being as simple as the smallest of toys to as complex as a group of people interconnected
The extended family predominated pre-industrially because of the need for a large family to help tend the land or look after those who were unable to do so. Infant mortality was high so you had to produce more children to be sure of having enough help. The family were a unit of production producing only the goods needed to survive and trading the remainder. Following the Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century, it was replaced by the nuclear family which was a unit of consumption as family members became wage earners and families needed to become more geographically mobile and move to where they could find work.
The world polygamy means the practice of having more than one wife. It comes from poly meaning ‘many’ and gamos meaning ‘marriage. Polygamy has been around for many years, and by many years, it’s been around since the biblical ages. In the Old Testament of the bible polygamy was allowed, not only was it practiced or allowed in the Old Testament but other cultures and religions practiced polygamy as well. These religions included Hindus, Muslims, and Christians. The Old Testament gives multiple examples of men being married to more than one wife at a time. The patriarchs Abraham and Jacob are known to be examples of righteous men who had several wives in the Old Testament. It is said that in ancient times when a man had more than one wife or wives and concubines(a woman who lives with a man but has lower status than his wife or wives) these wives and concubines were segregated by position and authority within the husband’s family. The first wife held the highest position and it was to her first –born son that the husband’s inheritance was given. (www.bibleresearch.org)
To thoroughly elaborate on the institution of family we most look at the family as it was before and how much it has changed over time. Throughout the years we are recognizing that the family is slowly being replaced by other agents of socialization. Families in the past consisted of a mother and a father and most times children. We are, as many societies a patriarchal society; men are usually the head of the households. This has always been considered the norm.