Celia A Slave Professionalism

736 Words2 Pages

In our society professionalism is in the core of most occupations. Professionalism leaves the idea most individuals have to be very mindful that their opinion and beliefs do not reach the surface. Although our country and its ideals have been surrounded and created by select people’s beliefs and affect their performance. Celia, A Slave, is an excellent example of this. In Celia, the author states, “personal and political are never totally separate”. This is very true when using Celia as an explanation. In Celia a major theme in the novel was morality. The lawyers had to question their morals when defending Celia. Not only did politics at the time sway or change the lawyer’s opinions on slavery as an institution, but the personal opinions of …show more content…

During her short life Celia spent all of it in Missouri. Missouri has a very prominent history with slavery, beginning with the Dred Scott case. The case preceded Celia’s by a couple of years, the case ended with the idea that slaves were not citizens so the law cannot benefit them. Historically Missouri was exempt from the Emancipation Proclamation, slavery was not abolished until 1865. Celia growing up a slave in a state that has defined a slave’s place in the supreme court sets the scene of her case before it was even brought to court. Since most of Missouri’s land is susceptible to agriculture, it did benefit from the supply and demand of slaves. The political, historical and economic components all apply in Celia’s case. The history and politics at the time defined the tone of her trial and the economic elements determined how and why she was in that area in the first place. The aspects also determined how the political system would work in her …show more content…

During that time period people, especially public figures, that went against the social norms of slavery put their lives at risk. It was not just the defense of trial that challenged slavery, but also their likelihood of helping her escape from the fear of her likely death before the new trial. It was not an easy undertaking for the lawyers to defend her case with how the court would have viewed Celia. The jury of Celia’s case were all white men. All of her jurors all more than likely saw Celia as an item or property instead of an individual. The gender and power dynamics of Celia’s case helped the layers defend her case. The lawyers used the defense that she was a woman who resisted sexual assault so as a woman, regardless of race, should be able to defend herself with support from the law system. This was the main argument that helped Celia’s case. Although since she women, but a woman who was a slave, she had no power. This lack of power did not help her case. Her lack of power is what subjected her to the rape in the first place. Essentially, her defending herself against Newsom was her claiming her power and autonomy

Open Document