Cauyahoga River Research Paper

1091 Words3 Pages

In 1969, the Cuyahoga River (in Cleveland, Ohio) caught on fire because it was “polluted from decades of industrial waste.” Furthermore, after the river set on fire for the final time, the government of Cleveland stepped in to stop the factories’ water runoff into the river. They no longer allowed the factories to have overflow into the river, Although the main problem was fixed for the present, another problem was creeping up: runoff from large industrial farms. Pollution is a serious matter, because if our world gets polluted, it will no longer be safe or healthy to live. The way people eat has a big part in pollution. If they eat locally, or at least try to, they can help cut down on out pollution. The method of Local Sustainable farming …show more content…

Was it grown locally? How was it grown? Were chemicals used? Eating locally promotes the health of the consumer. Michael Pollan and Richie Chevat, author of The Omnivore's Dilemma, stated, “No fossil fuels or added fertilizer or chemicals needed” (148). Since there is nothing being added to the animals’ diet or their pastures, their meat is more nutritious because they are eating the nutrients that they need through, not a corn-fed diet and a condensed living area like a CAFO farm does. Julia Vogel, author of the book, Local Farms and Sustainable Foods, said, "It takes a lot of human-made chemicals, plus fuel energy, to keep the produce looking perfect while it's shipped" (Vogel 6). Since the food isn't grow naturally, but instead chemicals that were created and used by us, which are abundantly poor for the environment, but also the consumer. When people think about the food they eat, us as consumers need to think about what is is made of and where how it was made. If a fruit has no bruises, chances are it was created with chemicals, and if is does have a bruise, chances are that it was grown in a natural environment. One organization that would disagree with this is McDonald’s as well as a CAFO farmer. Pollan says, “These animals have evolved to eat grass. But at a CAFO, they are forced to eat corn-at considerable cst to their health, to the health of the land, and ultimately to the health …show more content…

Whether it is growing their own garden or going to a nearby farmerś market, eating and buying locally is superior for the consumer and the environment. When food is naturally grown, it is better for the environment."Almost everything the farm uses is grown on the farm. Almost all of the energy used to make the food comes from the sun. there are no pesticides, no artificial fertilizer, no pollution, and no extra waste. Everything is recycled" (Pollan 148/150). On Joel Salatin's farm, a local farm in Swoope, Virginia, they doesn't use as many chemicals, fertilizers, or pesticides as a standard industrial food systems. They mostly use natural fertilizers. For example, Joel has a rotation; every day, he moves his cows and chickens to a new pasture (Pollan 147-148). This way, the soil will be more fertile, and it will be in better, not worse, shape. "...My snack could have traveled 8,000 miles to get to my mouth... it takes a lot of energy for food to travel so far" (Vogel 6). For an Industrial food product to travel about 8,000 miles with pesticides and chemicals in it, it makes the pollution in the air worse. The more energy that we use, and the more pollution we create, the worse our future will be because trucks carrying meat and fruit from other cities and countries are worsening our environment by polluting it.Michael Pollan interviewed a few people that shop at Joel Salatin’s farm and one lady said “I drive 150 miles one way in order to

Open Document